Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Race Prep (https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep-75/)
-   -   New race pads? (https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep-75/new-race-pads-93950/)

Steve Dallas 07-18-2017 03:52 PM

Another happy Carbotech user here on sport brakes. XP10 front and XP8 rear. Enough bite and very linear response throughout. Long lasting and gentle on rotors. I can't think of a reason to try anything else.

HHammerly 07-18-2017 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by hornetball (Post 1428441)
I'm liking PFC. Based upon everyone's description of Cobalts, they seem similar.

I got 9 track hours out of PFC 01 fronts on 11.75 front, PFC 11 sport brake rears still have 75% left on them, very easy on rotors and good cold performance so you can drive home with them
Going to try porterfield R4-s pasd this weekend

Midtenn 07-18-2017 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by hornetball (Post 1428441)
I'm liking PFC. Based upon everyone's description of Cobalts, they seem similar.

We use PFC 97's and PFC11's (depending on availability) on our Chump Car and love them. Great feedback, easy to modulate, and not an aggressive initial bite (cuts down on flat spots). We easily get a 14-16 hour race weekend out of a set. Usually get another 7-8 race out of them after that. On my HPDE car, I usually get 2-3 full weekends out of them. Heating up and cooling them down kills their life expectancy.

dc2696 07-18-2017 08:28 PM


Originally Posted by Bronson M (Post 1428012)
Just swapped carbotech XP10 for G-loc G10 and they are better in quite a few ways. The G-loc don't have a groove in the center so they don't squeel quite as bad the carbotechs. The Carbo's dusted really badly but so far the G-loc isn't as bad. Pedal feels firmer but we'll see how they do at the next track session. At temp the Carbo's have a spring feel to them, not mushy but there is some travel to the pedal which once you're over the odd sensation makes them easy to modulate.

Went from Carbo's (10/8's) to GLOC's (10/8's) on my SM this season, wow that was a learning curve.

The GLOC's have a good amount more initial bite, you really need to sharpen your pedal feel quick or you'll be doing 200ft lockups. Dust wise they are about the same, I see no significant difference.

I thought about swapping back to my carbotechs but after a few events I've gotten the feel of the GLOC's down so I'll probably just stick with them now.

DeerHunter 07-19-2017 01:25 AM

I thought the G-Locs were basically clones of the Carbotechs (same compound).

sixshooter 07-19-2017 08:51 AM

I've run the Cobalt and PFC and like them both quite a lot. My complaint with the Cobalt is the large rivets take up usable pad thickness, like 1/3 of it. Bonded pads like the PFC give you more life for the $$$. But these newer generation compounds are great.

k24madness 07-19-2017 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by sixshooter (Post 1428602)
I've run the Cobalt and PFC and like them both quite a lot. My complaint with the Cobalt is the large rivets take up usable pad thickness, like 1/3 of it. Bonded pads like the PFC give you more life for the $$$. But these newer generation compounds are great.

Those rivet are soft brass. They won't score your rotors if you get into them.

I like to change my pads right about that point anyway. The heat transfer to caliper gets greater when there is less pad left. That last portion also contains some of the bonding chemical and tends to behave differently than the first half of the pad.

MX5RACER 07-19-2017 12:36 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have run Carbotech pads, way back before the current company owned them, the Hawk DTC pads (combination of 60 and 30 front and rear) and the Cobalt pads in my track car. My car sees similar abuse to an endurance car in that my Dad and myself share the car and one of us will run the car in one session and the other will run it in the very next session so the car sees very little break during the day.

I have zero experience with the current offerings from Carbotech and the pads I have run from the older company I would not recommend.

Hawk DTC pads are what we currently run on car and are very happy as the car does see street use and the DTC compound works at lower temps.

Cobalt Spec Miata pads are very good, but you need to be cautious when you get down to the end of the pad life, as they can start to crack and delaminate from the backing plates. Another note about the Cobalt pads is that they are designed to be run without the metal shims that a normal pad rides on to help aide in quick pad changes. A word of caution, if you switch from the Cobalt pads to another pad, remember to install these shims. I had a scary incident where my Dad changed the brake pads over to the Hawk DTC pads and did NOT install the shims. I was going into turn 1 at Sebring when the brakes almost stopped working, long pedal and hardly any brake force. I was able to get the car slowed down enough to make the corner and brought the car back to the pits. What we found when we torn the car down was down right scary! The pad moved enough without the shim to drop out of the slot that hold the tab on the pad (Thanks Sebring Turn 17!). So when I stepped on the brakes, the tab on the end of the pad was outside of the caliper bracket and only the rear section of the pad was making contact with the rotor. My pressing of the pedal harder and harder, actually bent the backing material (See attached picture).
Attachment 180513

sixshooter 07-19-2017 09:35 PM

The rivets on the Cobalt pads left grooves in short order, brass or not. It looked like there was plenty of pad left to finish the second half of Sunday but there wasn't.

curly 07-20-2017 01:47 PM

If you're down to the rivets you need new pads, plain and simple. We usually do 1 set of rear pads/rotors a year, and one set of pads last ~8 hours. Depending on the track sometimes we can reuse the front
rotors, other times we'll need new rotors. The cobalts will work amazing right down to the backing plate, we've done it a number of times.

If you're not choosing cobalts for rotor wear reasons, you need a hpde pad, not a race pad. VERY different requirements.

Mobius 07-21-2017 12:33 AM

^ Troof

sixshooter 07-21-2017 07:20 AM

I don't think you understand what I said. I said 1/3 of what appears to be pad thickness is unusable because it's stuffed with rivets. Not what I'd call a bargain.

sixshooter 07-21-2017 07:34 AM

2 Attachment(s)
These pads only looked about half worn or maybe a little more from the top but there was an awful grinding metallic sound and it was eating the shit out of my rotors. So I pulled them out to inspect and lo and behold I was grinding the tops off of gigantic fucking rivets. So this means that if I decide to run a Cobalt pad I need to stay at least an eighth of an inch off of this thickness which means that I'm using about half the pad that I would if I had to stay an eighth of an inch off of one that was just bonded. Does that make any sense to anybody?

*eighth of an inch by eye is my emergency minimum.

Bronson M 07-21-2017 10:29 AM

Not to mention the chunking you were getting.

For comparison, this is how thin you can run carbotechs.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...3988890981.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...90ec766a05.jpg

Brakes felt fine on the last lap on track, I knew I was pushing my luck. What's interesting is the pad taper you see here, it's not typical pad taper in that the leading edges is cooler than the trailing edge. This was caused by the caliper rotating on the pins, wearing the trailing edge on the back of the caliper and the leading edge on the front pad. It's not a lot but enough to want non floating calipers.

fmcokc 07-21-2017 10:43 AM

Seriously, you all need to try the ST43's

They are the best kept secret in pads.

k24madness 07-21-2017 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by sixshooter (Post 1428992)
Does that make any sense to anybody?

Something else is going on there. I've never seen chunking like that and I've run my pads a whole lot thinner. Curious about rotor size, temps etc. Also what compound.

If the PFC's don't chunk like that then you got a solution that clearly works. We had great results with em on the E36.

hornetball 07-21-2017 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by sixshooter (Post 1428992)
Does that make any sense to anybody?

Makes sense to me. Based upon the amount of pad material as seen from the top of the pad, I would not have changed those pads either. They look like they have several track hours of useful life left.

sixshooter 07-21-2017 11:56 AM

It's been a couple of years, but the chunking may have been damage that occurred when I was using a Flathead screwdriver to lever the pads back to leave room for the insertion of new pads. I seem to vaguely recall removing them to inspect them and then returning them to the caliper to assist in gently leveraging the Pistons back.

curly 07-21-2017 12:40 PM

We run our cobalts down to the level of the above carbotechs. Greddygalant corrected me, we actually get 16 hours on our fronts. Chunking happens, just like the pictured carbotechs.

MX5RACER 07-21-2017 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by k24madness (Post 1429030)
Something else is going on there. I've never seen chunking like that and I've run my pads a whole lot thinner. Curious about rotor size, temps etc. Also what compound.

If the PFC's don't chunk like that then you got a solution that clearly works. We had great results with em on the E36.

I would see the same chunking on the Cobalt pads on my car as well. One of the reasons we switched from Cobalt to the Hawk DTC pads. It sucked too as Cobalt is only a few miles away from my house.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands