Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Steampipe manifold failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2017, 10:57 PM
  #41  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default



When the nut backed off:


Wastegate


__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 05-16-2017, 11:13 PM
  #42  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

Thankyou,

Nothing particularly standout about it, just built properly and consistent welds.

Im going to better prepare my materials as best I can, do wider welds, and use gussets.

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 03:27 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

The other thing I have noticed is that no one braces their turbo so the full weight of the turbo is on the manifold. I was told by Southeast Power Systems' turbo guy that this is just unacceptable on a road race car. A cast manifold can handle that abuse but a welded manifold needs to have the weight of the turbo supported by a brace to the block just like every OEM does from the factory. I need to do this on my own setup. He said you should be able to remove any one piece of the manifold, turbo, downpipe combo with no movement from the other two pieces.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 03:40 PM
  #44  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

/\ all completely true and valid.
18psi is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 04:49 PM
  #45  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
The other thing I have noticed is that no one braces their turbo so the full weight of the turbo is on the manifold. I was told by Southeast Power Systems' turbo guy that this is just unacceptable on a road race car. A cast manifold can handle that abuse but a welded manifold needs to have the weight of the turbo supported by a brace to the block just like every OEM does from the factory. I need to do this on my own setup. He said you should be able to remove any one piece of the manifold, turbo, downpipe combo with no movement from the other two pieces.
What you talking about Willis?



I was rocking a brace 5+ years ago.
shuiend is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 05:01 PM
  #46  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
The other thing I have noticed is that no one braces their turbo so the full weight of the turbo is on the manifold. I was told by Southeast Power Systems' turbo guy that this is just unacceptable on a road race car. A cast manifold can handle that abuse but a welded manifold needs to have the weight of the turbo supported by a brace to the block just like every OEM does from the factory. I need to do this on my own setup. He said you should be able to remove any one piece of the manifold, turbo, downpipe combo with no movement from the other two pieces.
Except none of us know how much or what direction our turbo moves when it gets to operating temperature. So the lack of movement when cold means nothing.
aidandj is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 05:13 PM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Except none of us know how much or what direction our turbo moves when it gets to operating temperature. So the lack of movement when cold means nothing.
I think you're over thinking it. The turbo moves with the motor. He was most concerned with just supporting the weight which just requires brace to the block. He mentioned that it could even be as simple a steel tube with bolts through crushed ends if you wanted to do it on the cheap. Sure there will be some expansion from heat but weight from the turbo will crack the manifold far faster. I'm not a metallurgist or engineer but I'm pretty sure this guy is an engineer and he has been doing this for 30+ years. I'll take his word for it.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 05:50 PM
  #48  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

My concern has always been that I dont know if the brace will just concentrate force somewhere as the manifold expands.

I guess the force of the turbo weight X g-force is higher..?

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:03 PM
  #49  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

I've cracked a lot of manifolds. also fought with keeping the turbo bolted up. Had the best luck for fabricated manifolds by making them out of mild steel schedule 40. I think this is because it has lower thermal expansion than stainless closer to cast Iron. having said that at best I think I could get a full year of track days out of one before it would need some sort of repair. how its welded and gussetted to the turbo flange is critical. I make gussets out of 1/2" round bar on the back side of the flange. I countersink the stud holes through the flange into the round bar. use 10mm Inconel studs about a half inch longer set in helecoils and stage 8 nuts. the longer bolts make them more spring like and able to maintain clamp load without stretching better. My turbo also has an extra bracket so it is mounted on a diving board to the block similar to a stock Mazdaspeed. The other thing that is critical is proper support for the downpipe at to the transmission bellhousing, loose that support and your manifold or turbo to manifold joint is gone in one session.
bbundy is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:09 PM
  #50  
Art
Junior Member
 
Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 369
Total Cats: -251
Default

.

Last edited by Art; 06-11-2018 at 07:42 PM.
Art is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 05-18-2017, 06:17 PM
  #51  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
My concern has always been that I dont know if the brace will just concentrate force somewhere as the manifold expands.

I guess the force of the turbo weight X g-force is higher..?

Dann
I mostly agree, you can add a brace but it could just as well move the stress to another location. My approach if I build a custom manifold would be to design the manifold to deal with the vibration and thermal stresses without any turbo bracing. It might be heavier, or more expensive, or whatever but I don't want my manifold to live only because there is a brace that is supposed to help keep it alive. More like how OEM turbo setups work, their stock manifold is just beefy enough that it works as-is. I think the welded ones failing are just material selection problems, weld problems, or design problems. I think if you use the right materials and technique it can be reliable, outside of miata-land there's plenty of folks racing reliably with welded turbo manifolds. Perhaps look at what they do in motorsports for some examples of what works.

Also if you look at the pics spencer9474 posted here, you can see there's a sharp angle change where the weld failed. It was not radiused, which puts a huge stress riser (bad weld design). His repaired manifold shows that weld is better, but still not a smooth radius into the pipe. Putting a big stress riser there is asking for a failure, and that is something anyone can change.

This is my manifold. I didn't make it (it's a cx racing manifold) but I did weld a pipe to for an external gate. I radiused the weld going from the pipe into the base material, you can see the smooth radius in the 2nd pic where the pipe joins the manifold.

Name:  20170130_153313_zps0mqk4tdr.jpg
Views: 525
Size:  267.1 KB

Name:  20170131_200002_zpsjj4z0xvr.jpg
Views: 597
Size:  252.2 KB
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:19 PM
  #52  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Wait... you're using a CXRacing mani?
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:21 PM
  #53  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Wait... you're using a CXRacing mani?
I am now. Was running ebay cast iron, but wanted something that flows better and does not point all the cylinders into each other. This manifold required several modifications to make it work, all documented in my build thread. I should have just made my own, this one looked nice but didn't fit right.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:21 PM
  #54  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

13-520A I have a similar part designed for mine. boss on the turbo downpipe flange bolted to a bracket attached to the block. Also my first brackets were mild steel needed 4130 steel to keep it from cracking.
Attached Thumbnails Steampipe manifold failure-1n39061_1000.gif  
bbundy is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:32 PM
  #55  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

I didn't know MSM had a brace. Interesting. So there brace is more for vibration dampening it seems, as it's not designed to be super rigid by any means. Looks like an L-bracket that was designed to move around but still offer some support.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 06:34 PM
  #56  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

it's very rigid. super thick. we've discussed this eleventy billion times now, not sure why people still don't know about the msm brace lol

btw most (all?) oem turbocharged cars like the msm use something very similar. I'd love to see a version of it modified to work with the custom tubular bottom mount setups
18psi is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 07:14 PM
  #57  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
it's very rigid. super thick. we've discussed this eleventy billion times now, not sure why people still don't know about the msm brace lol

btw most (all?) oem turbocharged cars like the msm use something very similar. I'd love to see a version of it modified to work with the custom tubular bottom mount setups
You know how it works, we have tech discussions in folks build threads 1/2 the time. I've never owned or really looked into a stock MSM turbo setup, just didn't know they had a brace. I guess the way it's used it's not easily visible either, so despite seeing underhood pics of stock MSM turbos, I've never noticed it was braced.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 07:43 PM
  #58  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Yeah you're right, it's actually something that's not easily visible even if you do own an MSM. Directly underneath a bottom mount turbo, covered by all the other stuff.

The metal is pretty thick though. Like, engine mount type metal
18psi is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 08:06 PM
  #59  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
I didn't know MSM had a brace. Interesting. So there brace is more for vibration dampening it seems, as it's not designed to be super rigid by any means. Looks like an L-bracket that was designed to move around but still offer some support.
Its like 1/8" steel somewhat springy in the vertical direction you can kind of flex it a bit by hand but not much. on the B6 and BP GTX it was two piece thick cast Iron part to the block and a flat steel part bolted to the turbo. I built mine more the later style to bolts of the engine mount to the block with a thick bracket and two bolts I can access from the top to a steel plate that bolts to a single boss added to the turbo outlet flange. as long as that connection and the downpipe connection stay in tact with the gusseting I do around the turbo flange plus Inconell studs I can get about a years worth of track abuse out of it without too much fuss. I see allot of setups on here that wouldn't last one track event.
bbundy is offline  
Old 05-18-2017, 09:57 PM
  #60  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

These were both on very very quick dedicated road race cars, with no support. Ill start adding support to road race packages.

Got some pics BBundy?

Dann
nitrodann is offline  


Quick Reply: Steampipe manifold failure



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.