Originally Posted by njn63
(Post 1015188)
You can also use the f-body ARP studs in place of the 90-93s. Somehow it's significantly cheaper for 5 f-body studs than it is for 4 Miata ones.
Part number is 100-7708. |
Originally Posted by bbundy
(Post 1015841)
Interesting from Summit 5 of the F-body studs are $13.82 and 4 Miata studs are $26.67. .509 knurl versus .507 probably close enough. 2.5" long instead of 2.75". why are they so much cheaper I wonder.
Different number of "splines" on the knurl so you have to persuade the F-body ones a bit more than the Miata specific ones during install. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1014656)
Mazda's front hubs are reboxed NTNs, available for ~$100 in a few places. You can occasionally find Timkens for ~$65, and those are reboxed NTNs as well, but the Timkens may or may not have the ABS ring in the correct place and availability is spotty. I have yet to experiment with anything cheaper than the $65 Timkens.
Originally Posted by Spookyfish
(Post 1015747)
I am having the hubs sanded down very slighly (2/100th) so you can actually slip them in and out of the bearings by hand, without destroying the bearings. I had that done a while ago so I'm not replacing bearings this time. |
Originally Posted by cucamelsmd15
(Post 1015874)
I dont think thats going to work out the way you think it will, but Id be interested in hearing your experience after the fact.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1014496)
I have a Mazda hub floating around we were using for R&D. I'll try to post some photos of the Dorman part and the Mazda part together later this week.
|
Originally Posted by cucamelsmd15
(Post 1015874)
I dont think thats going to work out the way you think it will, but Id be interested in hearing your experience after the fact.
nicely with a wooden stick and a tap from a hammer. Bearings need no replacing this time. |
I just received my Rockauto order and got one of the Taiwan and one of the China rear hubs. After reading the posts here I decided to check the measurements around the entire hub. They are virtually the same except for the noted stud design difference between the 90-93 hub and the 94+ hub and the inside spline depth. The 94+ hub splines are cut deeper into the center of the hub vs the 90-93. Given the spline difference on the 94+ hub, that's the one I'm going to use. I contacted Rockauto and emailed them with pics and requested an RMA # and a shipping tag. Hopefully they will have the 94+ one in stock.
|
Let us know if they are able to get you a specific one. I am returning my Made in China Dorman to Amazon and need to figure out how to get a Made in Taiwan unit to match my other one.
|
4 Attachment(s)
For those of you with more expertise and/or any idea what to look for, is there a reason NOT to just run one of the China and one of the Taiwan hubs if you are swapping out the wheel studs?
Taiwan: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1370002394 China: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1370002394 Taiwan: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1370002394 China: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1370002394 |
Please disregard my last post. I was apparently having a mental block with regards to the differences in the two hubs.
Since I have 94+ ARP rear studs sitting in a box, I want to keep the Made in China hub and send back the Made in Taiwan hub. When I look on eBay, all of the pictured hubs appear to be the Made in China version (no additional holes, black studs). Amazon's picture was the Made in Taiwan version (additional holes, silver studs). That leads me to believe that the China version may be a more recent one? |
Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
(Post 1015864)
Volume... (or deeper pockets in the Miata camp :))
Different number of "splines" on the knurl so you have to persuade the F-body ones a bit more than the Miata specific ones during install. .002" is seriously nothing. Manufacturing tolerances on a knurled surface are more than. |
So the F body studs are shorter or longer?
|
I think a 1/4" shorter.
|
Originally Posted by njn63
(Post 1017081)
I pulled them through using a lug nut.
Never, ever pull studs into the hubs with lug-nuts. Press them in using a hydraulic press. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1017485)
Huge no-no, dude. You likely twisted the splines as you pulled/twisted the stud into the hole. The splines are what retains the stud in the hub, so you run the risk of the stud spinning and losing the lugnut.
Never, ever pull studs into the hubs with lug-nuts. Press them in using a hydraulic press. |
Originally Posted by cucamelsmd15
(Post 1017486)
The HF C clamp press also works for the cheapasses. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1017485)
Huge no-no, dude. You likely twisted the splines as you pulled/twisted the stud into the hole. The splines are what retains the stud in the hub, so you run the risk of the stud spinning and losing the lugnut.
Never, ever pull studs into the hubs with lug-nuts. Press them in using a hydraulic press. --Ian |
Originally Posted by codrus
(Post 1017545)
I guess it's possible, but I've pulled them in with a lugnut and then taken them out again -- splines were all fine. If you lube up the threads with penetrating oil then it goes in with a lot less force required than is used to torque the lug nuts (like 40 ft-lbs).
--Ian |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1017485)
You likely twisted the splines as you pulled/twisted the stud into the hole. The splines are what retains the stud in the hub, so you run the risk of the stud spinning and losing the lugnut.
The risks I see in installing a stud using a lug nut are: -Taking out the splines and ending up with a stud that spins during tightening/loosening. -Ending up with a stud that isn't completely bottomed out. (This could become a huge problem when the stud gets pulled through further and clamp load is reduced severely) |
Originally Posted by njn63
(Post 1017923)
Is this something you've seen happen or is it just a theory? Because a wheel stud that is properly torqued has a shit ton of clamp load (something like 5 tons) acting on a small flange... it's not spinning easily based on the math.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1017930)
Explain to me how you're going to properly torque it when it's spinning in the hub.
To make myself clear, I'm not arguing that it's the proper way but sometimes other methods work in a pinch. If the hubs were off the car I would of used the 20 ton press (probably the most under-utilized tool in my garage). |
Good luck stripping those splines with a lug nut and a wrench.
|
Originally Posted by njn63
(Post 1017950)
Obviously you can't. I read it as you saying it would loosen on the track after being properly torqued. If you didn't mean it that way, we're pretty much on the same page. :party:
To make myself clear, I'm not arguing that it's the proper way but sometimes other methods work in a pinch. If the hubs were off the car I would of used the 20 ton press (probably the most under-utilized tool in my garage). |
Just FYI - I was able to get a human being on the phone and get them to put hands on the product to confirm. eBay item #181114194737 from Diversified Auto Parts in FL had some made in China (black '94+ wheel studs) Dorman 930-550s in stock.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Finally got time to do my hubs tonight and noticed something that could be a source of problems for people who have replaced rear wheel bearings and reused the original hub. I was talking to the old dude at the shop and fucked up on the first one and left the snap ring out, so I had to pull it back apart. I wanted to separate the hub and the inner race that came out so that I could fully reassemble the bearing before the final press. The only way I've ever seen that done is a little heat plus a chisel to get enough of a gap to get a puller in there. The chisel process left some nice little burrs:
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1373263530 That surface mates up to the bearing and is supposed to be flat. If someone weren't paying attention or didn't bother to file those burrs away (or were careless with the file and gouged the radiused section), you'd end up with some weird stresses in there when you tightened the axle nut. I could see it causing a failure with enough time. Maybe common knowledge for the mechanic types, but if you're like me and do bearings once every 2-3 years, it's something to watch for. |
Another data point... it seems that I got a bad taiwanese dorman replacement. It was not the one that I filed on in the picture above, but the one on the other side of the car. The first time I installed it was with a new Timken bearing and the assembly had play once I got it on the car with axle nut torqued. Felt like normal bad bearing play, so I assumed I got a bad bearing, pulled it back apart and put in another fresh bearing. Still had play. I stuck a magnetic base dial indicator on the control arm and tried to find exactly where the play was, just to be sure it wasn't a bushing/bolted joint. All signs pointed to the bearing/hub. Pulled everything back apart and put in another fresh bearing with my old OEM hub, and the play is gone. I've measured and compared the bad hub to the stocker that I removed and can't find anything wrong with it, but I have trouble believing that I got 2 bad timken bearings in a row. I think I'm just going to spend the extra on new OEM hubs from now on...
|
So general consensus is Timken 513152 up front and Dorman 930-550 in the rear?
Timken 513152 AutoZone: $72 Amazon: $103 RockAuto: $97 I find it interesting that my local AutoZone has RockAuto beat by $25 EACH for front hubs. Plus free shipping and a $20 gift card. Dorman 930-550 AutoZone: $44 Amazon: $30 RockAuto: $22 Plus RA wants $8.75 to ship them, not to shabby. Are you guys still getting mismatched pairs of Dormans from RockAuto? |
Autozone had some ridiculous deal on both the Timken front and the Timken rear bearing, beat Amazon and Rockauto. I lucked out on the Taiwan hubs from Rock, but I messed up the bearing on one of them, then couldn't get the hub out.
You can go to O'Reilly and you can check the box before you buy it. Rear Taiwan hub from O'Reilly was about $45; worked in a pinch. |
RockAuto has the Timken 510003 rear bearing listed at $22 and AutoZone wants $40 for the same, so again its about 1/2 the price. Same shipper as the Dorman hub, so that's convenient. Now all I need the seal and the nut and I should be good to go.
Oh, and I need a press... |
Yeah, but if you fuck up the install, you do have a local supplier.
I bought the rear bearings and hubs from Amazon (free 2 day, holla), the front hub assemblies from Autozone w/ a 20% coupon, and the rest of the small bits from Mazdaspeed or Rosenthal (caps, axle nuts, etc). NOTE NOTE NOTE: the axle nuts provided are too big, so just buy them from Mazda. |
Good note. I'll just order them from Rosenthal when I get my LE/R tie rod ends. :cool:
|
Has anyone had the 1994+ ARP rear studs (100-7720) not fit in a Dorman China hub?
I didn't put much effort into measuring them so they may be off a thousandth or 3 Dorman knurl diameter: .565 ARP Knurl diameter: .581 |
I've heard that as well. Apparently the Taiwanese hubs have the OEM knurl diameter.
|
Looks like Evo studs should work in those, at least on paper. ARP # 100-7717
|
Originally Posted by FatKao
(Post 1105083)
Has anyone had the 1994+ ARP rear studs (100-7720) not fit in a Dorman China hub?
I didn't put much effort into measuring them so they may be off a thousandth or 3 Dorman knurl diameter: .565 ARP Knurl diameter: .581 |
Originally Posted by FatKao
(Post 1105083)
Has anyone had the 1994+ ARP rear studs (100-7720) not fit in a Dorman China hub?
I didn't put much effort into measuring them so they may be off a thousandth or 3 Dorman knurl diameter: .565 ARP Knurl diameter: .581 |
The knurl diameter on the front studs is 0.507. I thought I may have gotten the China/Taiwan->ARP stud mapping wrong, but these are a completely different 3rd size. I don't see anything notable about the hubs that could be used figure out which hub you'll need before pressing out a stud.
|
Evo studs work. So yeah, measure your stud knurl if you get China hubs.
|
Are you guys measuring the knurl diameter on the dorman studs or the size of the hole?
If I understand correctly, if the hole in the hub is .565", than it is only .016" smaller than the ARP knurl. That sounds right for press fitting something that's knurled. |
Im measuring the diameter of the stud knurl. So the ARP stud is too big by .015
|
Is the stud you are measuring brand new or has it already been pressed in? The knurling on my dorman studs measured .563-.570 depending on where you measured but it was obviously crushed from being pressed in.
|
It was one that was pressed in. The ARP stud was not going in. A 12 ton press got it about 30% in with significant amounts of metal collecting in front of the stud.
|
Originally Posted by FatKao
(Post 1106915)
It was one that was pressed in. The ARP stud was not going in. A 12 ton press got it about 30% in with significant amounts of metal collecting in front of the stud.
--Ian |
Originally Posted by Erat
(Post 1009075)
You should have.
It's the hubs that are failing, not the bearings. Read the thread an posted before i refreshed to see the one above me. Edit2* This is somewhat common, and has happened before on stock hubs, on spec miatas. Here is one for example. Pictures inside: XceedSpeed Hub Failure - YouTube guys, that was my car... and a couple of things worth mentioning... That was my 1st Spec miata. It had been a spec miata (100% original engine, trans and rear hubs when I bought it in 2007 after being a spec miata since early 2000 and over 38k miles including 2 10 hour enduro races before I ever saw it) I had 3 left side crashes (1 per year) since owning it and although visually checked the hubs after the crashes, never saw any cracking and didn't think to change the rear hub and bearing (no play so why change what didn't appear broke?) ..so in summary, 3 left rear crashes, over 45k track miles with 89k on the odo probably overdue to change the left rear hub especially after the hits! I did (just for piece of mind) change the right side hub after the fact so the 'new owner' shortly after this incident got all new hubs and bearings at all 4 corners! |
2 Attachment(s)
...and Rockauto fail, again. I also got one Taiwanese and one Chinese hub. WTF.
Can anyone out there offer any input on the apparent durability of the Dorman hubs under extended track use (so far)? |
@1:40 mark |
When was the last time you changed your rear hubs?
Wow! Just wow!
|
Whose rear hubs? OEM, old V8R, or new 0.500" V8R?
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1266081)
Whose rear hubs? OEM, old V8R, or new 0.500" V8R?
Past month I changed out both rears. Halfway through a track day drivers side had developed a hellacious howl. Shop said the hub had cracked 3/4 around the flange and it fell apart during disassembly. Unknown mileage OEM hubs, I put on 60-70 additional hours on them. 200whp/2350lb/all on 200TW rubber except 6X20 min. W2W on SM6's. |
Whi makes the best hubs out there?
Which ones are more prone to fail - front or rear? D |
Wow.
I just ran LRP last week and started getting a high speed vibration that felt worse than just picking up some marbles on the tires. I'll be checking driveshaft, rear end, axles AND HUBS before driving it again. Best case its warped rotors/pad transfer from me throwing new DTC-60's on rotors that are almost to minimum |
My rear hubs are at about 185,000 miles.
Front hubs probably at 25,000 miles. |
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 1267014)
My rear hubs are at about 185,000 miles.
Front hubs probably at 25,000 miles. |
BUUUMMMPPP!!!
Adding my name to the list. Thank goodness, no video, but I do have pictures: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1456103838 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1456103838 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1456103838 Both sides had circumfurential cracks all the way around. On the passenger side, the cracking was only evident on the outside. But on the driver's side, cracks had gone all the way through. I honestly have no idea why this didn't launch a wheel -- but I'd rather be lucky . . . . |
Yuk.
|
Originally Posted by hornetball
(Post 1309798)
Both sides had circumfurential cracks all the way around. On the passenger side, the cracking was only evident on the outside. But on the driver's side, cracks had gone all the way through. I honestly have no idea why this didn't launch a wheel -- but I'd rather be lucky . . . .
|
Just thought I would add some info on my hubs for the database:
Original to the car Mazda OEM hubs. 92,000 miles on the chassis. 30,000 miles Auto-X/Track. This has been a dedicated Auto-X/HPDE/TT car for a number of years. No W2W. No crashes. Just track duty. 135 RWHP. 2400 pounds with fuel and driver. 949 BGK and R-Comps. Normal cornering G's around 1.2 to 1.3. Also, in my case the cracks appeared first on the outside surface where it is easy to see once the brake disk is removed. The last time I did this was 1.5 years ago when I reverted back to OEM disks from a first gen Goodwin rear BBK. At that time, the hubs were wire brushed and no cracks were observed. From here on out, I'll be inspecting every time I change rear pads. |
Wow. Good catch. Regular inspections are now on the must-do list.
My 2.0 build is a 180k mile chassis, so new rear hubs are now on the happens-before-first-track-day list. |
I am gonna lump rear inspection in with fronts. Every 3 track days seems wise given the consequences.
|
Originally Posted by Mobius
(Post 1310446)
My 2.0 build is a 188k mile chassis, so new rear hubs are now on the happens-before-first-track-day list.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands