2.0...ish, But for REAL this time.
#102
So we can all agree facts are fact.
Fact is, people that want to agree with me, have what they need to agree with me.
Fact is, people that won't agree with me, will never have what they need to agree with me.
I could have the car dyno'd at 10:00 am Monday morning with my 2.5" log every bit of binary data that car puts out, pull it off install the 3" dyno it again at Noon logging all the same stats, and there will still be that guy that says,"Well it was warmer at noon than at 10:00 am so your test is invalid."
Fact is, people that want to agree with me, have what they need to agree with me.
Fact is, people that won't agree with me, will never have what they need to agree with me.
I could have the car dyno'd at 10:00 am Monday morning with my 2.5" log every bit of binary data that car puts out, pull it off install the 3" dyno it again at Noon logging all the same stats, and there will still be that guy that says,"Well it was warmer at noon than at 10:00 am so your test is invalid."
that said, I'm trying really hard to get proper data to compare here.
aidan posted clear and readable/comparable plots.
you posted mashed potatoes.
your argument would make sense if we didn't have LOTS of plots proving it to be utter nonsense
that's exactly what I thought
#103
and in a real world application the DA outside will have more of an effect then 10-20 whp
**** two dynos wont even read that close between each other.
While the power is power..im just saying I highly doubt anyone would notice such a little amount thats like 1psi if that on a good happy turbo
**** two dynos wont even read that close between each other.
While the power is power..im just saying I highly doubt anyone would notice such a little amount thats like 1psi if that on a good happy turbo
300 rpm of spool on the same turbo is huge.
--Ian
#115
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
Total Cats: -30
Nope. that's not how this site works. we pride ourselves on not being a bunch of sheeple retards who hang onto the bare words of every dumb n00b who thinks they know what they're doing. we work off data here.
that said, I'm trying really hard to get proper data to compare here.
aidan posted clear and readable/comparable plots.
you posted mashed potatoes.
your argument would make sense if we didn't have LOTS of plots proving it to be utter nonsense
that's exactly what I thought
that said, I'm trying really hard to get proper data to compare here.
aidan posted clear and readable/comparable plots.
you posted mashed potatoes.
your argument would make sense if we didn't have LOTS of plots proving it to be utter nonsense
that's exactly what I thought
I don't have any boost controller just the 8 psi wastegate.
(just realized I can just go do some 40 rolls to compare to the other, but people will still think its witchcraft that my car made better power with my 2.5")
Last edited by Pretending2koolz; 06-29-2016 at 09:45 PM. Reason: after the fact
#117
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Stop filling this forum with your useless pile of garbage "data". Show some respect for your so called "physics bruh". What the **** can we do with a 40 roll log and a dyno. The car is loaded completely differently. What the **** will a 40 roll log do when we dont know the conditions.
**** off and close this thread already. All you are doing is spreading bullshit and dribbling out the side of your mouth.
**** off and close this thread already. All you are doing is spreading bullshit and dribbling out the side of your mouth.