Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Running out of fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2019 | 01:24 PM
  #21  
Ted75zcar's Avatar
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,870
Total Cats: 383
From: Boulder, CO
Default

This was with a continental FFS, which IIRC had a circular electrode running down the middle. Designing a system to be fail safe is good engineering practice, you will not convince me otherwise.
Old May 16, 2019 | 01:44 PM
  #22  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

You're allowing consistently sub-par operation during common crossover events, in exchange for prevention of a hyper-rare edge case. If we're talking about a singular foreign object, it would need to breach two separate filters and get through the pump to even make it to the sensor. If we're talking about a buildup of smaller particles, those particles are going to destroy the injectors anyway, even moreso if you locate the sensor after the fuel rail. So even if that edge case occurred, it would likely cause total fuel system failure regardless of the position of the sensor. Nothing about any part of that decision tree says good engineering practice to me.

If you wanted the best, you would run the sensor in the feed line in parallel with a secondary fuel line, but I don't know that I would want to add the extra failure points in exchange for the microscopic chance of the sensor becoming plugged.
Old May 17, 2019 | 01:12 PM
  #23  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

I think my DW200 is wearing out in about a year. Purchased from TSE in March 2018 so should not be a knock-off. I am not loosing fuel up top, but it is taking longer and longer to give me a Pre-Start prime.

In theory, OEM will supply my power needs, but they are really expensive. Not an option for OP, however.

Are Walbro, DW, and OEM our only options?

If I go with Walbro 190 LPH, who is the recommended source?
Old May 17, 2019 | 02:27 PM
  #24  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,164
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
I think my DW200 is wearing out in about a year. Purchased from TSE in March 2018 so should not be a knock-off. I am not loosing fuel up top, but it is taking longer and longer to give me a Pre-Start prime.

In theory, OEM will supply my power needs, but they are really expensive. Not an option for OP, however.

Are Walbro, DW, and OEM our only options?

If I go with Walbro 190 LPH, who is the recommended source?
My DW200 also died just recently and I too bought it from TSE around the same time frame last year.....

I went with a Walbro 255, I bought it from 5x Racing it was 100 bucks. Its SO MUCH LOUDER than the DW200 but if it lasts longer than 10 months thatll be just super.
Old May 17, 2019 | 02:32 PM
  #25  
thebigtuna's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 160
Total Cats: 12
From: Columbia, MO
Default

Originally Posted by andyfloyd
Its SO MUCH LOUDER than the DW200 but if it lasts longer than 10 months thatll be just super.
I hope my DW200 hangs on for a while. If its that noticeable, that would drive me crazy in a street car. Over a year now in mine with no issues thankfully.
Old May 17, 2019 | 04:37 PM
  #26  
lbatalha's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 22
From: Portugal
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
I would seriously consider moving the sensor to the return if it is not already there. I have personaally seen one of these get plugged by a foriegn object. On that install, the sensor was on the return, so the result was an extreme rich (safe) condition. If the sensor had been on the source line, it most likely would have been catastrophic.
But we have programmable ECUs that will solve this problem right?
We can just enable AFR failsafe which should cut your ignition completely very quickly (I personally have it set to +0.5 AFR error above 100kpa, and to fully cut after 1 second, I would set it to cut faster but I have returnless so heatsoak is a pita sometimes).
Old May 19, 2019 | 05:40 PM
  #27  
Mudflap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 468
Total Cats: 87
From: Louisville, Co
Default

UPDATE: Got the fuel pressure sensor up and running and took a bunch of logs. I have not been able to replicate the fuel pressure loss that I did on the dyno. I maintain a fuel pressure - boost psi < 50psi all the time. I get a small drop as a boost through 25psi. But I don't see a big drop like on the dyno.

But, I didn't up the fuel pressure from the 45psi to a 60 psi on the pressure regulator. Now, interesting thing is that the fuel pressure sensor isn't reading 60psi, it reads about 45psi. So I wonder if when we changed the fuel pressure regulator down to "45" psi, it was actually a lot lower... Could be the real problem to begin with.

BTW, 25psi is bananas.

Also, I HATE MEGASQUIRT. There I said it. Feels good. ******* documentation for the MS3PRO (MSM 0405) states that the backside port has an Analog Input1. WRONG. The ******* "rear option connector" pin D isn't connected the ****. There is no trace going to/from that pin. Christ. So that analog pin1 is actually connected to the main connector pins.
Old May 19, 2019 | 09:23 PM
  #28  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,164
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Originally Posted by Mudflap
UPDATE: Got the fuel pressure sensor up and running and took a bunch of logs. I have not been able to replicate the fuel pressure loss that I did on the dyno. I maintain a fuel pressure - boost psi < 50psi all the time. I get a small drop as a boost through 25psi. But I don't see a big drop like on the dyno.

But, I didn't up the fuel pressure from the 45psi to a 60 psi on the pressure regulator. Now, interesting thing is that the fuel pressure sensor isn't reading 60psi, it reads about 45psi. So I wonder if when we changed the fuel pressure regulator down to "45" psi, it was actually a lot lower... Could be the real problem to begin with.

BTW, 25psi is bananas.

Also, I HATE MEGASQUIRT. There I said it. Feels good. ******* documentation for the MS3PRO (MSM 0405) states that the backside port has an Analog Input1. WRONG. The ******* "rear option connector" pin D isn't connected the ****. There is no trace going to/from that pin. Christ. So that analog pin1 is actually connected to the main connector pins.

When my pump was going out it wasn't until the pump got warm after running for a while that it started dropping pressure. For the first 20-30 minutes it would usually be fine, then it would start having issues the longer the car was running continuously.
Old May 19, 2019 | 10:21 PM
  #29  
Mudflap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 468
Total Cats: 87
From: Louisville, Co
Default

That's good info - it has been cold (48deg) this weekend. I'll keep an eye out as we warm up.
Old May 16, 2021 | 09:44 AM
  #30  
nashvill's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21
Total Cats: -2
From: Estonia
Default

Did you get fuel sorted?
Old May 17, 2021 | 04:52 AM
  #31  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,576
Total Cats: 244
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

In Estonia, the clocks are two years behind.
Old May 23, 2021 | 09:19 AM
  #32  
nashvill's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21
Total Cats: -2
From: Estonia
Default

Originally Posted by Gee Emm
In Estonia, the clocks are two years behind.
maybe 😁.
Lot of posts with good info never get finished whether its fixed or not. And what was the solution.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsmx5
General Miata Chat
131
Jan 10, 2016 01:25 AM
TheDriver
Race Prep
10
Dec 27, 2012 02:43 AM
69Falcon
ECUs and Tuning
2
Mar 4, 2011 12:42 PM
mtl_miata
Engine Performance
11
May 10, 2010 12:19 PM
Stein
Engine Performance
7
Nov 27, 2009 01:04 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.