MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Thoughts on base map for 1.6 EV14 Flow Force Injectors 640cc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2017, 04:15 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 157
Total Cats: -12
Default Thoughts on base map for 1.6 EV14 Flow Force Injectors 640cc

Hi. I know... lots of bad cats.

I read a bunch before this and saw that basically I need to set my idle cells around 65 and plug in the correct numbers for req fuel and dead time.



Question is: what about the rest of the table? I know there is a formula to scale but that seems unlikely to work accurately since the VE #'s on the tails of the distribution vary so wildly from the older injectors. Here is what I have doing some eyeballing and interpolation based on a few maps I've seen with these injectors.




For those looking for the injector info:MS2

If you have a Mazda Miata running a Megasquirt 2 at 3 bar, you would input 1.12ms @ 13.2v with a 0.144ms/v battery voltage correction.
mr steve is offline  
Old 09-19-2017, 05:27 PM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

You take whatever table you had before, up the idle and low load/rpm cells to 65, and start there. Assuming everything else is correctly entered in too. There is no "standard" per se.


Why would you zero out that bottom row? Now every time you're at really low load the car is gonna go berserk interpolating between those two rows, fighting enrichment and ego correction. It's dumb
18psi is offline  
Old 09-19-2017, 05:35 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 157
Total Cats: -12
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
You take whatever table you had before, up the idle and low load/rpm cells to 65, and start there. Assuming everything else is correctly entered in too. There is no "standard" per se.


Why would you zero out that bottom row? Now every time you're at really low load the car is gonna go berserk interpolating between those two rows, fighting enrichment and ego correction. It's dumb
I only see those cells in Decel, feels much better like that when downshifting. I guess I can do it with the afr table more cleanly.
mr steve is offline  
Old 09-19-2017, 05:40 PM
  #4  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

If it works for you then cool I guess, I've tried that before on different Miata's and it made the car really jerky at really light load/light throttle situations. There's really no need to zero out the fuel table unless you don't use fuel overrun cut for whatever reason.
18psi is offline  
Old 09-19-2017, 05:41 PM
  #5  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

Or fuel cut. That's what it's there for. But until it happens, no need for the discontinuity.
DNMakinson is offline  




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.