Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Fuel System Upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
pdexta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,954
Total Cats: 184
From: Knoxville, TN
Default Fuel System Upgrades

I haven't found much on the site regarding fuel system upgrades beyond injectors and a fuel pump. I've seen people question how effective a stock FPR is with an upgraded fuel pump, but haven't seen any real consensus. Is there a point at which fuel lines need to be upgraded? Is there a point that a 255 walbro isn't enough? Any other issues to address?

I've still got hopes and dreams of 400whp (probably 350 realistically) and considering a switch to E85, which will add additional strain to the system. Right now my plan is for 1300cc injectors, mtuned fuel rail, fuelab FPR, and walbro 255 with the stock supply/return lines. Are there other mandatory upgrades or significant weak points in that setup?
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

I know vlad ran >300whp on e85 and dw1000's or something, no problems. Soviet runs >400whp on stock fuel lines, albeit a crazy fuel pump and big injectors. But stock tank/lines IIRC.

I don't think lines will be your problem, and i really think that fuel pump will flow plenty for 350whp with 1300cc injectors even on e85. There is only one way to find out though, Do it and get back to us.. for science.

As for the wally 255 + stock regulator, I too have seen this debated. I just slapped a wally 255 in my car, and the fuel map needed NO retuning, so I'm guessing it's not (yet) overpowering the stock FPR. Although FPR's are cheap, and for a big power setup it would probably be a good idea to get one for peace of mind.

PS, i always loved reading your build thread and was wondering what happened with your car. Did you ever get it to make decent power?
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Not dw....ID1000 ftw
Also I find the wally to be nearly tapped out at just a bit over 400 on e85. Soviet basically ran into the same issue. I'd go dw300 or something more serious. Also I'd stick with the smaller injector and bump up the pressure if you're only shooting for 400, because better spray/atomization.

That's basically it.

I'm sure others (the 400+ crew) will chime in with much more helpful info.
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 02:33 PM
  #4  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Not dw....ID1000 ftw
Silly me, i definitely knew that. Master race ID injector owners...
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #5  
pdexta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,954
Total Cats: 184
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Seems like I wasn't overlooking anything too major, so that's good. I also realized 1300's cost almost double 1000's, so 1000's it is!

I felt like problem after problem with my car was making me look like a 'tard so I kinda shyyed away from updating the build. It finally looks like it's coming together again though, once I've got something I'm not embarassed to post I'll get the build caught up. I hope to have it on the road again by Thanksgiving.
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 02:55 PM
  #6  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

That's great man, good for you.
In for 400whp glory
Old Oct 28, 2013 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by pdexta
Seems like I wasn't overlooking anything too major, so that's good. I also realized 1300's cost almost double 1000's, so 1000's it is!

I felt like problem after problem with my car was making me look like a 'tard so I kinda shyyed away from updating the build. It finally looks like it's coming together again though, once I've got something I'm not embarassed to post I'll get the build caught up. I hope to have it on the road again by Thanksgiving.
Ha! Don't worry about that man. I sure don't think you are a tard, I've loved all the different miatas you have had (especially the teal NA, lol) and always enjoyed your videos. You've built some respectable machines thus far, i have no doubts this current one will fall into place.
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 02:02 PM
  #8  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Wally400E85 (wally 465L) or bust. They're so fracking cheap, and like silent.
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #9  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

the stock FPR has been known to handle the 255, the stock FPR has also been known to fail with the 255, but just like stock bottom ends at 300rwhp, your FPR is on borrowed time. (as recently as the last 60 days, someone with the 255 + stock FPR came to us with fueling problems - in his case, the 255 killed his stock FPR in about a week) I know of no documented cases in which a 190lph HP has overwhelmed the stock FPR. I would recommend 190lph as a limit for the stock FPR. Your lines shouldn't have problems with gasoline, as it's pressure, not flow, which would cause them to rupture, and while any larger pump you add will certainly add flow, you're generally going to replace the injectors with higher flowing units before you start fiddling with the fuel pressure.
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 02:48 PM
  #10  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by fooger03
the stock FPR has been known to handle the 255, the stock FPR has also been known to fail with the 255, but just like stock bottom ends at 300rwhp, your FPR is on borrowed time. (as recently as the last 60 days, someone with the 255 + stock FPR came to us with fueling problems - in his case, the 255 killed his stock FPR in about a week) I know of no documented cases in which a 190lph HP has overwhelmed the stock FPR. I would recommend 190lph as a limit for the stock FPR. Your lines shouldn't have problems with gasoline, as it's pressure, not flow, which would cause them to rupture, and while any larger pump you add will certainly add flow, you're generally going to replace the injectors with higher flowing units before you start fiddling with the fuel pressure.
Well then, that just added a part to my winter shopping list. LOL, what aftermarket FPR do you guys recommend, and how do you bypass the stock one when going to an aftermarket setup?

I guess i have some research to do.
Old Oct 29, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #11  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

The easy way to bypass the stock FPR is to run the MTuned fuel rail. When I looked I never found an adapter plate that had our FPR flange on one side and any sort of thead on the other.

FPR wise, fuel lab or aeromotive. The AEM is serviceable but I'm still awaiting the day that the seal blows and it starts leaking fuel all over my engine bay.
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 01:48 PM
  #12  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,405
Total Cats: 149
From: Oakdale, CA
Default

TL;DR

I run a Walbro 255hp, stock lines, stock fuel rail, stock regulator, ID1000's and E85 and make 360whp. I think I am at like 40% duty cycle, Vlad will have to clarify that number for sure.
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 01:50 PM
  #13  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Yep lol. I have no idea how or why its so low. Its a sign we should just re-tune for 40psi
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 05:59 PM
  #14  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

I thought that the general consensus was that a 255HP would overpower stock FPR's, and the 190HP would be sufficient.

or?
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 06:16 PM
  #15  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Whenever we talk about fuel systems, I wish we could all mention what year car or other modifications they have done. A returnless NB with a non vacuum sourced regulator @ 60psi in the tank is a bit different than a NA8 @ 43.5psi with a legit return system and vacuum sourced regulator under the hood.

I'm running a 190HP on factory parts in my NB, no issues I am aware of with pressure or regulator. It is noisy, but I'm also a wuss about such things.


Like this:
Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
TL;DR

I run a Walbro 255hp, stock lines, stock fuel rail, stock regulator, ID1000's and E85 and make 360whp. I think I am at like 40% duty cycle, Vlad will have to clarify that number for sure.
Profile says you are driving a 90 with a 1.6, truth?
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 06:30 PM
  #16  
aaronc7's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 43
From: Florida
Default

^ Agreed on your first point... when I was new and learning I was all the DIY FAQ stuff, but didnt realize till later down the road that it all pretty much applied to NA return style fuel systems. Stock NB stuff sucks. I'm at 20psi and hitting 70+ duty cycle already with Wally 255 and ID1000s.

Pdextra, keep your build thread going! No need to be shy about the fail.... I need someone to relate to.
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #17  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Uhh, if that last VD is correct you are near 400whp?
In which case 70IDC on a wally and ID's is actually right on the money

I've used 255's on all my NB's. Haven't had FPR issues yet, and they all had/have stock FPR's.

Whatever that's worth.
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #18  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,405
Total Cats: 149
From: Oakdale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Like this:
Profile says you are driving a 90 with a 1.6, truth?
That is the truth 1990 fully built 1.6l. MS2 tuned by Vlad, using an O'Reillys fuel filter. Stock return style system. The only thing added was the Walbro 255hp, ID1000's, and the MS2
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #19  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by aaronc7
Pdextra, keep your build thread going! No need to be shy about the fail.... I need someone to relate to.
^ Agreed. have you seen my rotrex fail thread? Of course, I DID bury it in the thupercharger section for a reason.
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 07:11 PM
  #20  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
That is the truth 1990 fully built 1.6l. MS2 tuned by Vlad, using an O'Reillys fuel filter. Stock return style system. The only thing added was the Walbro 255hp, ID1000's, and the MS2
Magic 1.6 FPR ftw! I'm rocking my original 90 FPR with 170k miles on it and a wally 255 with dw800's. I was originally planning on using this exact fuel system for my new build and ~300whp goals, but I'm starting to worry about the FPR.

What will happen if this thing fails? Will my system go pig rich or lean out? or will it fluctuate? Any reason not to rock this setup until if/when it fails?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 AM.