Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Piston to wall clearance supertech pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
mrmonk7663's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 20
From: Texas
Default Piston to wall clearance supertech pistons

Hey folks. I did quite a bit of searching on this and found some varying info.

Per an earlier post by Savington supertech reccomends a .0028” ptw.
I have gathered that this seems a bit “tight” for a performance build.
Savington goes on to say that he uses a .040” for some of his track cars, and even higher on others. Other forum members have used smaller than reccomended .0028” and that was universally frowned upon. Finally a few guys have run between .0030 and .0040”

i am building an engine for street and occasional track events. It will be NA initially and then will receive a rotrex c94. Goal is a modest 300hp.

Is it safe to say .0035” is a nice happy medium for my intended purposes with the supertech alloy? I would like to keep oil consumption minimal and get some good miles out of this build. Oil squirters will be plugged. Any recommendations would be appreciated.

Thank you.

Last edited by mrmonk7663; Nov 1, 2017 at 12:57 AM. Reason: Spelling
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 08:04 AM
  #2  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

I am at almost .0038 and the engine sounded great when cold/hot. Unfortunately I have other issues atm.

Super Tech / wiesco xxx
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
mrmonk7663's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 20
From: Texas
Default

Good to know. Sorry for your troubles. What’s going on?
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 01:25 PM
  #4  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

Originally Posted by mrmonk7663
Good to know. Sorry for your troubles. What’s going on?
Its in my build thread. Just a pile of random misfortune.
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 03:32 AM
  #5  
mrmonk7663's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 20
From: Texas
Default

Anyone else? I could use the guidance.
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 07:49 AM
  #6  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

I'm pretty sure I just ran whatever the included documentation suggested
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 08:04 AM
  #7  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

Yep, any machine shop with lots of experience building turbo engines, will want the spec sheet. Then they might make a minor change that they like.
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 03:07 PM
  #8  
rwyatt365's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,459
Total Cats: 132
From: ATL
Default

FWIW - I'm running with a .0030" clearance on a .5mm overbore and have been happy. Engine was built in 2014 and I have no complaints.
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 03:28 PM
  #9  
mrmonk7663's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 20
From: Texas
Default

Alright guys. Thanks. The spec is .0028. But that does not take into account a forced induction build. Sure you can boost on the spec but generally I’ve seen over the years that more power and boost tends to use a little bit loser. I was just trying to determine if there was an accepted middle ground for these pistons and moderate. boost. Thanks for the replies.

Last edited by mrmonk7663; Nov 3, 2017 at 04:11 PM.
Old Nov 3, 2017 | 11:00 PM
  #10  
tetraruby's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62
Total Cats: -1
Default

I went 0.003" with Supertechs.




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.