Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Used M-tuned reroute or wait for Q-max stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 01:20 AM
  #1  
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
From: Central Texas
Default Used M-tuned reroute or wait for Q-max stock?

Haven't quite been able to find a satisfactory answer from searching so I hope I don't offend.

Crux of the question is basically, given all the chatter and demand for the Q-max reroute, is there really a big enough performance difference compared with something like the M-tuned reroute to justify a new kit over a reasonably priced used one?
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

The Q-Max has one giant benefit to me over the standard spacers. The ease of installation and removal of it with the engine in the car. No clue how it compares in that re-guard to the M-tuned re-route.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 09:49 AM
  #3  
skylinecalvin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 486
Total Cats: 89
Default

I'd like to add, the bleeder valve on the Q-Max is pretty helpful as well.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 01:53 PM
  #4  
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
From: Central Texas
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
The Q-Max has one giant benefit to me over the standard spacers. The ease of installation and removal of it with the engine in the car. No clue how it compares in that re-guard to the M-tuned re-route.
Yeah definitely not looking to do anything more than the front PPF bolt to install or change thermostats down the line. I suppose the ssemi-remote tstat location is supposed to help in that matter. Thanks for chiming in.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
From: Central Texas
Default

Originally Posted by skylinecalvin
I'd like to add, the bleeder valve on the Q-Max is pretty helpful as well.
Hadn't even seen that beforehand, thanks. Seems like a huge convenience factor, that might be the selling point for me.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 04:18 PM
  #6  
Schroedinger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 790
Total Cats: 188
From: Atlanta
Default

I don't doubt that the Q Max is a better product, but at the end of the day it will work exactly the same as the M-Tuned when installed. I installed my M-Tuned kit with the motor in the car without any major issues. It took me about three hours to install, it's one of those jobs that's more tedious than hard. It seems to be a high quality setup and I've never had an issue with it. Conceptually the air bleed in the Q Max seems like a good idea, but I didn't really have an issue with burping the M-Tuned system either.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
brainzata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 17
From: Bay Area CA
Default

What about the max G? As far as the rear housing, looks pretty nice. I am curious about the dual outlet. The I.L motorsports is a similar design as far as the rear housing.
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 06:27 PM
  #8  
ridethecliche's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 146
From: New Fucking Jersey
Default

There's also the hawley kit.
Old Aug 7, 2018 | 01:38 PM
  #9  
jtt's Avatar
jtt
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 191
Total Cats: 37
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

This could just be in my instance, but I couldn't get the Qmax reroute to clear the egr tube on my nb2 motor. I ended up just going with an mtuned reroute solution. I may just be a wuss with a hammer though.
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 11:59 PM
  #10  
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
From: Central Texas
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
There's also the hawley kit.
Perhaps it's just been what I've read previously, but I've seen a lot of opinions falling against the spacer--type reroutes like the Hawley.
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 12:01 AM
  #11  
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
From: Central Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jtt
This could just be in my instance, but I couldn't get the Qmax reroute to clear the egr tube on my nb2 motor. I ended up just going with an mtuned reroute solution. I may just be a wuss with a hammer though.
Have you had any issues flushing/burping the cooling system with yours? Slash would you recommend? I'm looking at one for $150 open box.
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 10:09 AM
  #12  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Perhaps it's just been what I've read previously, but I've seen a lot of opinions falling against the spacer--type reroutes like the Hawley.
I've run a BEGI and now the Hawley and had no issues with leaking. The BEGI had a horrible heater core hose barb location which made swapping transmissions in the car impossible without damaging the heater hose. The Hawley has worked great for over a year. The only small issue I have is how close the CLT sensor is to the heater hose. Mine just happened to tighten down at just the wrong spot. I've talked to other owners who haven't had this issue.

Old Aug 9, 2018 | 10:28 AM
  #13  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Perhaps it's just been what I've read previously, but I've seen a lot of opinions falling against the spacer--type reroutes like the Hawley.
The big issue with the old ones is that they were just plain old too thick. The original spacers were designed around a 1.6, and for whatever reason, every reroute of that type that followed was the same. Hawley fixed that with his, as did Skou with his later batches.

The only REAL remaining concerns/issues is 1) increase in failure points/gaskets and 2) on NBs specifically, this arrangement makes CLT sensor grounding issues (gauge only) very common and really annoying.

FUNCTIONALLY, they're fine.

One anecdote from me, since i've now done this on both cars: Clutch job with the QMax reroute is WAY more annoying than with the Skou setup i have on my other car. It sure is way prettier though.
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 10:56 AM
  #14  
jtt's Avatar
jtt
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 191
Total Cats: 37
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Have you had any issues flushing/burping the cooling system with yours? Slash would you recommend? I'm looking at one for $150 open box.
I use the Lisette funnel with the front elevated. No issues.
Revlimiter did a comparison with a bunch of reroutes:
http://revlimiter.net/blog/2017/09/coolant-reroute-shootout/
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kjoudrey
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
Oct 8, 2022 04:22 AM
Crazy Grandpa
DIY Turbo Discussion
35
Sep 30, 2020 04:29 AM
taxicabyellow
Engine Performance
13
Jan 13, 2011 05:24 PM
AutoFreak57
Miata parts for sale/trade
5
May 8, 2010 09:10 AM
m2cupcar
Engine Performance
0
Nov 12, 2008 04:00 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.