Supercharger Discussion For all you misguided souls.

2.0" vs. 1.75" tubing pre-intercooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2019, 10:18 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
poormxdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 98
Default 2.0" vs. 1.75" tubing pre-intercooler

Gentlemen,

As a follow up to a couple of other threads, I replaced my tiny, beat up Kraftwerks-supplied intercooler with a Vibrant unit, and I took the opportunity to replace the 1.75" pre-intercooler tubing with some 2.0" tubing. The output port on the C30-74 is 2.0". As supplied, the Kraftwerks kit came with a reducer right off the Rotrex. I've done some autotuning, and some tuning via log review. Here's a comparison. Just for truth in advertising, I also replaced the recirc valve. Left side is the current tune with the 2.0" tubing.

The car pulls noticeably better, despite extra weight in the front, and boost is coming on sooner. I got a max of 9.3 pounds, which is about a 0.6 pound increase over what I remember getting last November.

poormxdad is offline  
Old 02-18-2019, 10:30 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
HarryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 140
Default

That reducer KW provides is just stupid; guess they do it for routing/packaging. Did you upgraded to another recirc valve or a BOV?
HarryB is offline  
Old 02-18-2019, 10:36 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
lbatalha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Portugal
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 22
Default

I don't think the 1.75 tubing hurts it that much, it's more to do with an intercooler that isn't garbage. The KW 2"->1.75" adapter is quite short which is not ideal. In my setup I have a very long 2" to 1.75" 45 degree silicone tube that connects the rotrex to cut kraftwerks tubing (I only didn't cut the L shaped tube). I am routing the whole thing via the hole behind the headlight. I used the shorty KW 1.75->2 adapter on the intercooler intake as there the abruptness doesn't matter as much. This routing is also much smoother. Im using 2.5" on the hot side as that is what was readily available locally.




Last edited by lbatalha; 02-18-2019 at 10:51 AM.
lbatalha is offline  
Old 02-18-2019, 11:14 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
poormxdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 98
Default

I honestly believe it's the tubing size. When I got the Kraftwerks kit in 2015, I already had a MegaSquirt. The kit came with a decent bracket that held the MAF and pre-Rotrex intake tubing in place. I gutted a junkyard MAF and bolted everything up, while working towards a real hot side, cold air intake. Removing the MAF provided a similar increase in boost to enlargificating the tubing, and a similar need for more fuel across the entire VE Table.

I get my cold air from that hole under the driver's headlight.

I purchased the Type 10 Universal BOV from Silicone Intakes. She idles now at about 30kPa, which is a couple of units lower than I was able to get in the past.
poormxdad is offline  
Old 02-18-2019, 12:04 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
lbatalha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Portugal
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 22
Default

Good to know. I do plan to upgrade to 2" at some point, but almost certainly not at 9psi, and only after seeing how much power I make with the 75mm pulley. (trying to keep 5speed and stock-ish motor)

I would like to actually check the difference in pressure across the radiator. According to others locally who have installed this kit, I am making about the same pressure at the manifold they did with the KW radiator and tubing so thats a good sign.

EDIT: its weird that you are only making 9psi with the 80mm pulley, can you post some logs?

I am making 0.62bar/9psi/162kpa at 7200rpm with the 85mm pulley, EUDM VVT engine with RB manifold and midpipe (no cat, large but straight through 2.5" muffler), squaretop, stock TB.
lbatalha is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 07:56 PM
  #6  
Newb
 
bigb5031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 8
Default

Found this thread late last year and I'm back to post results. In early 2019 I installed a built motor with a rotrex c30-94 and reused my original intercooler pipes that came with the kraftwerks c30-74 kit. I was expecting 300hp but only was able to make 263hp. The car preformed great but I knew it could do better. I never knew about the kraftwerks reducer till I saw this thread. Then I also remembered; when I got a larger intercooler, years ago, I was in my early car modding stages so I only pushed the old kraftwerks pipes into each other. The overlap of a 1.75 pipe pushed into a 2.5 inch pipe could have also hurt flow and potential power.

Over winter, I removed power steering so I could clock the rotrex straight down and redo the original kraftwerks hotside intercooler pipes. Was able to run 2in pipe that is about 2/3 the length with 3 less bends. Pipes are from a cheap ebay universal intercooler kit. (sorry if pictures aren't sized well, I almost never post anything)






Was finally able to get on the dyno yesterday, just had to wear a mask while we were there. The first pull on the old tune was promising, made 278hp on it's first run. My tuner commented that it's good I haven't been beating on it because he had to add fuel almost everywhere. We hit some ecu limiters that we had to play with, and still playing with some (fm221) Ecu was/is stopping the show just above 6.7k but even only at 67xx rpms we made about 40 hp more! With a few hundred RPM's still to go, I like to think it'll be more in the 310hp range. What a major improvement for such a small change.


All done on pump 93, the same dyno, same tuner and tuned on the safe side for track days
Red 2013: c30-74 85mm pulley, stock vvt motor, kraftwerks full kit, axle back exhaust, AEM piggy back ecu (later went to smaller pulley but only street tuned it)
Blue 2019: c30-94 90mm pulley, built motor 9.5cr, light head work, full exhaust, square top, fm221 ecu (told him to stop at 7k, blower over spins after 7.2k)
Green 2020: Same mods but no power steering and larger/shorter intercooler pipes (some ECU limiter stopped us at 6.7k)

I'm surprised how early it started making more power than in 2019. This shows me even the c30-74 users should benefit from larger pipes since I started seeing restrictions well below the power level the 74 can make. Defiantly worth doing and thanks OP for pointing out that reducer that got my mind thinking!

Edit: Before was making 14.5 psi and we now saw 15psi at a slightly lower rpm




Last edited by bigb5031; 05-10-2020 at 08:02 PM. Reason: More info
bigb5031 is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 09:15 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
andym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 559
Total Cats: 77
Default

You mention removing power steering but you didn't mention AC. Were you able to clock the rotrex straight down and keep ac?
andym is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 09:34 PM
  #8  
jtt
Junior Member
 
jtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 190
Total Cats: 37
Default

Awesome update! When you clocked the rotrex down, how much clearance did you have between inlet and header?
jtt is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 11:26 PM
  #9  
Newb
 
bigb5031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by andym
You mention removing power steering but you didn't mention AC. Were you able to clock the rotrex straight down and keep ac?
Sorry, I didn't mention ac because mine has been long gone. It's easy enough to clock the rotrex (I watched a guy on YouTube do it first) You could easily test it out next time your bored or already taking it off to work on something else.


Originally Posted by jtt
Awesome update! When you clocked the rotrex down, how much clearance did you have between inlet and header?
The inlet has plenty and the same amount of room. I'm guessing you might have meant the outlet. It's definitely pretty close. Maybe a inch or inch and a half away. I do have the TRD header blanket between them. The blanket leaves no air gap tho, not sure if actually helping. But either way, I'd bet it's still cooler than any turbo application.


bigb5031 is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 11:29 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
andym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 559
Total Cats: 77
Default

I haven't mounted my rotrex unit yet but i've wondered if i clocked it similar to yours but one rotation toward the driver side instead if I can fit it with my ac compressor for better intercooler piping.
andym is offline  
Old 05-11-2020, 12:28 AM
  #11  
Newb
 
bigb5031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by andym
I haven't mounted my rotrex unit yet but i've wondered if i clocked it similar to yours but one rotation toward the driver side instead if I can fit it with my ac compressor for better intercooler piping.
I barely recall it but I think one rotation towards the driver's side put the outlet too close to the body. Not enough room to get a coupler on it, may be able to do some cutting to make things work.
Best of luck to ya, it's all part of the fun.
bigb5031 is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 02:22 PM
  #12  
jtt
Junior Member
 
jtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 190
Total Cats: 37
Default

Originally Posted by bigb5031

The inlet has plenty and the same amount of room. I'm guessing you might have meant the outlet. It's definitely pretty close. Maybe a inch or inch and a half away. I do have the TRD header blanket between them. The blanket leaves no air gap tho, not sure if actually helping. But either way, I'd bet it's still cooler than any turbo application.
Thank you for the pic! After my last tune with 2inch tubing, I'm tempted to replace the hotside with 2.5 inch piping. Buddy and I are making bets if this will increase flow even further . With the rotrex clocked down, I'm in the same boat as you with header -> tdr blanket -> rotrex outlet. There might be enough room to run a 2-> 2.5 inch coupler, but will come back with more info. :-)
jtt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
achandrashekar
DIY Turbo Discussion
8
04-30-2019 01:49 PM
X25
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
16
02-13-2014 03:14 AM
prxprx
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
9
10-31-2011 04:21 PM
topsdrop
Engine Performance
1
08-01-2010 11:18 AM
piratetim
DIY Turbo Discussion
8
08-30-2007 12:47 PM



Quick Reply: 2.0" vs. 1.75" tubing pre-intercooler



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM.