Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

80/20 Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2013, 06:08 PM
  #21  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

Well my alignment bolts FINALLY came in so I hope to get started on this project tomorrow.
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 08:18 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mobius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Default

Brainie's point is a good one. Emilio always recommends more negative camber in front than in the rear. Leafy's procedure is sound but you want to end up with less neg camber in back than in front.

Snippet from 949's alignment page:

SuperMiata DD Alignment
>=12" front ride height (measured hub center to fender)

>=4.5" front ride height measured at forward most straight section of pinch weld with 205/50/15 or 225/45/15 tires

Front camber: -2° (or as close as you can get to it)
Caster: >4°
Front total toe: 0

Rear camber : -1.8°
Rear total toe: 0

SuperMiata Race Alignment

<=12.0"

3.75~ 4.25" front ride height measured at forward most straight section of pinch weld with 205/50/15 or 225/45/15 tires

Front camber: -3° (or as close as you can get to it)
Caster: >+4.5° or max available once you reach camber targets
Front total toe: 0

Rear camber : -2.6°
Rear total toe: 0
Mobius is offline  
Old 01-17-2013, 11:56 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

What's the reason for less rear camber?
wannafbody is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 02:29 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: finger lakes NY
Posts: 433
Total Cats: 17
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
What's the reason for less rear camber?
I don't think of it as less rear camber, I think of it as more front camber. Ideally, we would have zero static camber and the suspension geometry would keep the tread exactly flat on the road during cornering. But that doesn't happen, so we need to dial in some negative camber to compensate for the fact that the tire leans a little.

The simple fact is, the front needs more compensation than the back in Miatas. But, more static negative camber up front makes the car a little less stable on bumpy roads, so the typical nancy-boy alignment compromises maximum cornering for stability. But it's your choice; it's not an iCar.
DaveC is offline  
Old 01-18-2013, 03:27 PM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Well you wouldnt want the tire perfectly flat to the road even if the suspension could do that due to the tire likely wanting a different amount of camber for maximum grip and based on carcase flex. And example of the first have, from the Milken tire test data I have I know a Hooiser R25A, under the loading it would typically see on the front outside wheel of our formula car, makes the most grip when it is cambered 1.5* towards the inside of the turn. I also know that the comparable goodyear slick in the same situation requires a different amount of camber for maximum grip and that in other loading situations and other locations (such as the inside front, outside rear, inside rear) the optimal camber is different.

But that is quite off topic and tire testing data that goes that in depth is WAY beyond the scope of anything any of us are interested in.
Leafy is offline  
Old 02-20-2013, 10:32 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

I had to get an quick alignment for a track day this weekend and after looking at the printout I was dumbfounded that they considered a good alignment as positive camber and 6-7 degrees of caster. The guy offered to do it the way I wanted so now I will tell him 4.5 caster, as much front camber as possible and matched side-to-side, rear camber .5 degree less than the fronts and matched as well. Zero toe in front and rear.
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Old 02-20-2013, 10:48 PM
  #27  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Jake's beard is legit as ****. I recommend all of you show some respect to the man.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 01:20 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
comradefks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Bay, CA
Posts: 351
Total Cats: -2
Default

If you aren't running the Xida suspension setup is the 949 race alignment still recommended for a track car?
comradefks is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 10:22 PM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mobius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Default

Yes.
Mobius is offline  
Old 10-15-2013, 06:13 AM
  #30  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

Slight thread change, but still related.

On my 01 (that I picked up as a track car based on this forums advice) I have 15x8 PF01's with 205/50 RE11's. The cars suspension is otherwise stock and the alignment I am going to request is:

-1.5 front camber
as much front caster without affecting camber
0 front toe
-1.2 rear camber
0 rear toe

The problem now is that I need to replace the eccentric bolts because, once again, my steering wheel is all crooked. I have the bolts ready to go, but now I need some pointers on the process. I've pieced together advice from searches and please correct me if I am wrong.

1. Remove eccentric bolts one at a time, marking their position, while supporting the control arm with a jack in a ?? position.
2. Torque the eccentric bolt to 150+ ft lbs or as tight as possible
3. Go get an alignment ASAP.

So, if I do this install correctly and go get the alignment, should I again put the car in the air and torque them down myself?
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Old 10-15-2013, 03:32 PM
  #31  
Newb
 
Jaxmadine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: titusville, fl
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -2
Default

Alaignment shop should tq them fine.
Jaxmadine is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 05:36 AM
  #32  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

So I am still left with one question then. Does the car need to be in the air or not to do this?
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 07:09 AM
  #33  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

Needs to be in natural compression not drooping.
nitrodann is offline  
Old 10-16-2013, 09:50 AM
  #34  
Newb
 
Jaxmadine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: titusville, fl
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -2
Default

Alingment shop will end up tightening them under full droop when they alaign the car. Just throw the bolts in and take it to the shop.
Jaxmadine is offline  
Old 10-17-2013, 06:42 AM
  #35  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Chilicharger665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,637
Total Cats: 57
Default

I will try and convince them to just install the new bolts for me. You wouldn't believe how long it took me to convince them to even do a custom alignment for me in the first place! I'm going to take some advice from earlier in the thread and bring a box of donuts, along with those new eccentrics.
Chilicharger665 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
06-02-2017 02:36 PM
spec1sef
MEGAsquirt
28
05-09-2017 07:03 AM
nigelt
Wheels and Tires
7
09-22-2015 12:32 PM
bigben
Race Prep
16
09-11-2015 03:41 PM



Quick Reply: 80/20 Alignment



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 PM.