And I get that now, and thanks for your response. I just found out the hardway that the NA U-joint would not work. It wasn't listed in any of the threads I saved for this swap. Nor did the NA tie rods worked either, though luckily Rock Out has the MOOG ones priced CHEAP!. Now at least, people will have a thread to go to, listing those A-most parts for a swap!

NA tie rod ends work just fine. The FUCA balljoint is longer to accommodate the deeper NB taper pocket, and the NB steering arm point on the spindle is lifted, but you can bolt the NA tie rod end to it. In fact, that's the preferred setup for lowered cars. I can't recall where I read this, but IIRC Bob Bundy did the math and said that an NB subframe/rack/spindle setup with 93LE/94R tie rod ends produced nearly zero bumpsteer all the way to full bump travel.

To swap an NB subframe into an NA, you need these parts and only these parts (and why you need them):

• NB subframe (this alters the FLCA pickup points and improves camber gain)
• NB steering rack, inner tie-rods, and mounting hardware (this is more reliable than the NA rack)
• NB lower steering column universal joint (required to attach NA shaft to NB rack)
• NB front upper control arms (or NA arms with NB balljoints) and NB-specific upper balljoint nuts (required to use NB spindles)
• NB front spindles (this reduces bumpsteer)
• NA 93LE tie rod ends (this further reduces bumpsteer, to effectively zero)

I do have the 93 LE tie rod ends. But I have no clue what is an "inner tie rod end", but I'll assume is just the tie rod. And if so, you just confirmed what I stated earlier regarding the MOOG NB tie rods I bought. They have their own part number, different from the NA tie rods.

I just got screwed last night on the U-joint to the steering shaft. For that part number: NC10-32-850 hooks it all up. I mean you posted it on your list, but I found out last night, as it wasn't listed anywhere else. Not here, not on M.Net or even the Grassroots Forum. It is in 2 out 3 now!

Oop, yes. I misread. Yes, the NB inner tie rods are different and correspond to the rack. I thought you said you needed NB outer tie rod ends, which is not the case. :)

All good ace!
The MOOG tie rods came with them. I got a new found respect to Rock Auto!

Now that I think of it my NB rack came with the U joint and I used that one on the NA shaft because I couldnt get the NA u-joint off the rack.

You will want NB knuckles as well. Bump steer is crazy with NA knuckles on an NB sub frame. Yes the knuckles are different. I think the best setup is all NB front end with LE tie rod ends for an aggressively lowered car.

I distinctly remember reading a post by you saying that you had measured the bumpsteer with that combo (NB subframe/spindles + NA LE tie rods) and it was ~1/16" from static ride height to full bump.

yea NB subframe knuckles with LE tie rod ends was the best. NB with NA knuckles was not so good and LE tie rods made that mismatch combo worse. If you run at stock OE ride height probably just stay all stock NB almost nobody in these forms runs stock ride height however.

Hehe, I paid $10. Right price, right place at the right time. I spent more on the U-Joint ($40) and the steering rack bracket ($2 used, NLA by Mazda, I bought 2 of them!), than I did on the rack and subframe itself!

And the NA steering column intermediate shaft won't work on the NB U-joint... If one tries to buy part NC10-32-090D new, is NLA. You then have to buy NC10-32-100D and new that one is oer $350, but used is less than $40 for both, thank GOD!

I believe that's false. I read that on M.net before I did Rover's swap, so I ordered the NB intermediate shaft too. It's identical to the NA one. I then skipped it when I ordered the swap parts for my current customer S1/ST4 build, and it worked just fine. NA column, NA intermediate shaft, NB lower universal, NB rack.

Really? The intermediate shaft is too long to bolt with the NB steering U-joint! I mean, could you describe how you made it work? I'm supposed to order the NB intermediate shaft tomorrow!

https://www.miataturbo.net/suspensio...me-swap-62426/

Darn it, right here is spelled out that the NB steering IMS is needed. Gosh darn it. :slap:

Post #19 from Doward says the u-joint is required, but not the shaft. The shaft is the long metal thing with the male splines, the u-joint is the bendy thing with female splines.

I get that boss! But it looks like one of us is misreading post#19. I read it as "The little shaft with the boot, is that what y'all are calling the "intermediate" shaft? If so, it is an NB piece and splined perfectly with my NA column", right?

I may just be tired, which I am, and in no way I'm trying to argue, just confused, that's all!

Yes, but it has nothing to do with an incorrect length as you alluded to. The length is correct, the spline diameter is just larger on the NB rack. You need the NB u-joint for the diameter, not the length.

The problem I'm having is that the NB U-joint is bigger than the NA, which makes the shaft too long to fit. Looks like I'm doing something wrong, but exactly what?
Should I unbolt the rack, plug the u-joint to the shaft, and bolt the rack back?
Sorry for all the stupid q's, but I'm at a loss here!