Xidas have extra travel in the rear too...
|
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1327445)
rly vlad?
Originally Posted by TalkingPie
(Post 1327441)
18psi, knowing that you spent some time on FM/Illumina, IIRC, how would you compare Teins and Xidas in comfort to them? I've been pretty happy with mine - in fact I was surprised by their composure over these moon-man roads today after spending 5 months in a land-yacht Concorde on Monroes - but I haven't experienced a Miata on anything but Illumina and stock.
Is there comfort Nirvana to be found on Xidas (maybe on 500ish spring rates) or Teins? Of course when it comes to performance, it's: 1) xida .. .. 5) fm/tokico .. 8) tein basis But for the 1000th time, I'm not a track racer so my experience can only be applied to street cars and never track cars. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1327437)
as long as you're happy with your really dumb decisions, good luck
Originally Posted by Hificruzer226
(Post 1327434)
The moral of my post, spend 2k and you wont be dissapointed no matter which direction you go.
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1327477)
Xidas have extra travel in the rear too...
|
Most people seem to revel at Xidas and based on peoples success in competitive events I can see why. From its birth from what 949 talks about it is a track set up with different spring rates available for different set ups ie tire and mainly what type of racing you do.
To me the FM Fox was set up and designed from birth to be the balance between street and track. Since I am going to drive it mainly on the street I want a set up that is geared more towards that. I feel as though the xida is a little more track dedicated yet tamable on the street. *****My opinion based on my research not fact nor do I present it as such.****** |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1327437)
as long as you're happy with your really dumb decisions, good luck
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1326753)
I daily drive a Formula 1 car, anything else is just too soft.
Quit being vaginas guythz If you don't feel like you're getting molested by a buffalo, sweaty, armpit stains, half a 40 in the passenger seat, lit cigarette in the overfilled ashtray, hard rock blaring through the 1 working speaker that's zip tied to a full roll cage, aluminum seats with no padding, 90 point harnesses, and gutted doors with half-gutted dashboard on your morning commute .......you are a VAGINA |
I was just saying that it seems like quite a leap to conclude that buying Fox shocks instead of Xidas is a "really dumb decision."
It's important (for some applications) to note that the Fox setup uses 2.5" springs whereas the Xidas use 2.25" springs. I understand that the smaller spring allows for more clearance, such as if one would like to run 10" wheels, correct? The Fox does seem like a really nice setup, and I'm sure you'll love them. |
Now that he's clarified that its mostly a street car, maybe it's not as dumb of a decision.
But man, since the price is the same, I really can't imagine seeing them on the same level as xida. If they were much cheaper, then we'd have a case. I guess that's why I concluded "dumb decision". If the fm/tokico combo was say, 1600-1800 dollhairs, I'd never recommend it to anyone. Even on a street car lol |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1327513)
Cause everyone wi th xidas complain about lack of rear travel so they can put the tire in the fender.
|
You can get the Xidas with a much lower rate spring if you like, and the dampening can work with it. On full soft (with 700/400 rates) the car rides pretty good but is slightly underdamped.
The Fox shocks claim 5" of stroke (doesn't specify if that's front or rear), to the Xida's rear travel of 4.13" (and 4.8" front travel). That's probably a slight benefit on the Fox, maybe? Dunno. Anyway, truth is, we'll never actually know which one of these setups is BEST. Xidas, MCS, Fox, Ohlins... There likely won't ever be an objective, independent, apples-to-apples test. So pick the one you like best, and the company you most prefer to deal with. |
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1327536)
You can get the Xidas with a much lower rate spring if you like, and the dampening can work with it. On full soft (with 700/400 rates) the car rides pretty good but is slightly underdamped.
The Fox shocks claim 5" of stroke (doesn't specify if that's front or rear), to the Xida's rear travel of 4.13" (and 4.8" front travel). That's probably a slight benefit on the Fox, maybe? Dunno. Anyway, truth is, we'll never actually know which one of these setups is BEST. Xidas, MCS, Fox, Ohlins... There likely won't ever be an objective, independent, apples-to-apples test. So pick the one you like best, and the company you most prefer to deal with. My friend is an instructor at summit I asked him if he was willing to drive them he said yes. So if I can get goodwin , and 949 to be on board they can use my car . I am willing for them to put a hold on my car for the suspension and who's avg the best times with the same spring rates I'll buy. I will also have video and full write ups. I also want to test the ride quality with my accelerometer. |
Good luck with getting everyone to agree that the test is impartial.
|
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1327540)
Good luck with getting everyone to agree that the test is impartial.
|
Highly doubt you'd get 949 on board.
Just sayin'. Would love to see a comparison done properly though. |
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1327545)
Highly doubt you'd get 949 on board.
Just sayin'. Would love to see a comparison done properly though. |
Are there any advantages to the Fox suspension for a street car over Xidas at all? Say, with relatively soft (550/375) springs and a taller than stock ride height? I'm in a similar boat as OP and was pretty much set to on the the Fox because it sounded it would be more suitable given that the Xida was designed for track use with low ride heights and stiffer springs in mind.
|
Originally Posted by z31maniac
(Post 1327523)
My point was the valving allows them to be comfy on the street with super high rates.
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1327526)
I was just saying that it seems like quite a leap to conclude that buying Fox shocks instead of Xidas is a "really dumb decision."
It's important (for some applications) to note that the Fox setup uses 2.5" springs whereas the Xidas use 2.25" springs. I understand that the smaller spring allows for more clearance, such as if one would like to run 10" wheels, correct? The Fox does seem like a really nice setup, and I'm sure you'll love them.
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1327540)
Good luck with getting everyone to agree that the test is impartial.
|
Yeah, basically what Z31Maniac said. High-quality dampers will work well in all situations, and as long as damping range will handle the spring rates, you're good to go. From the Xida product page:
|
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1327555)
Yeah, basically what Z31Maniac said. High-quality dampers will work well in all situations, and as long as damping range will handle the spring rates, you're good to go. From the Xida product page:
[/list]So, yes, if you put softer springs, the Xidas will make phenomenal street suspension. However, i ask the same question as apexaddict. I truly can't comprehend spending that kind of money on street suspension. I'd go for something that's decent quality but not race quality like Tein Flex Z or the like. |
Originally Posted by Hificruzer226
(Post 1327559)
If I can get the same corner speed as the Xida's with a softer spring for the same dollar why wouldn't I use it for a street car that hits the track 5 times a year?
I can't think of a single person here that would choose stiffer suspension over softer if both performed identically. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands