Go Back  Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. > Performance & Tuning > Wheels and Tires
Reload this Page >

For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...

Wheels and Tires All things related to Miata Wheels and Tires.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...

 
Old 02-04-2014, 12:10 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 4,449
Total Cats: 525
Default For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...

…apparently I was wrong.





Looking at the BFG site, I see that 8.5" is the maximum width they recommend. Doh. 225 Hoosiers fit fine on the 15x9s, I guess Hoosier is lying about the size.

So… what to do now? My plan was to put the Rivals on the new 15x9s for the Miata, move the 15x7 Team Dynamics that are currently on it to the Seven, and put new RA1s or RRs on the 15x7 Koseis that are stacked out-of-frame.

Put the Rivals on the TDs? 7" is the minimum width they recommend, ugh. Will RA1s/RRs fit on the 15x9s any better than the Rivals do? The specs on the Toyo site don't suggest that they're any wider than the Rivals are in 225/45R15.

Or should I just get a ClubRoadster sticker, embrace the "stance" and run them?

--Ian
Attached Thumbnails For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-rival1.jpg   For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-rival2.jpg   For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-rival3.jpg  
codrus is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:28 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,172
Total Cats: 150
Default

A slight stretch is good, whats the problem?
jacob300zx is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:31 AM
  #3  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,002
Total Cats: 282
Default

My 205/50's on my 8" wheels appear to have more "stretch" than those. They look fine to me.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:45 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 765
Total Cats: 34
Default

Those are fine, what exactly is your concern.
greddygalant is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:58 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 239
Total Cats: 26
Default

I've been running 225/45/15 Rivals on 15x9 6ULs for about 6 months. They're great. See the last Grassroots Motorsports. Andy's latest tire test indicated that the be the fastest setup for Rivals on a Miata.
I'm running 205/50/15 RRs on 15x9 6ULs also. The RRs are pretty wide for 205s.
EricJ is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:21 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 4,449
Total Cats: 525
Default

Hm, really? They look very stretched to me -- enough so that I was concerned about safety/de-beading, etc. The sidewall angle looks like 30 degrees, is that really acceptable?

I have the latest GRM sitting on my desk, haven't gotten around to reading it yet.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:31 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 4,449
Total Cats: 525
Default

I was expecting something more like this:



--Ian
Attached Thumbnails For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-rival4.jpg  
codrus is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 03:39 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 838
Total Cats: 113
Default

Looks fine to me.
jpreston is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 07:43 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,287
Total Cats: 124
Default

Looks fine, the big rim protector just exaggerates the look.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 08:45 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,188
Total Cats: 1,582
Default

Looks perfect. Go run those bitches hard.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 09:48 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 1,350
Total Cats: 68
Default

Looks great to me. The rim protector is exaggerating the stretch.
k24madness is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:08 PM
  #12  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 12,716
Total Cats: 658
Default

Originally Posted by codrus View Post
Hm, really? They look very stretched to me -- enough so that I was concerned about safety/de-beading, etc. The sidewall angle looks like 30 degrees, is that really acceptable?
Ha! Apparently you don't read enough around here to see the idiots we make fun of. That is not stretch, it's just an absence of bulge.

This is stretched:





They'll recommend an INCREDIBLY conservative wheel size to cover their ***. Any accident or tire fault with a tire bigger than 8" is automatically not their fault. But rest assured, perfectly safe.
Attached Thumbnails For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-86352d1207119704-aggressive-wheels-stretched-tires-post-em-up-sponsored-shyne-some-nsfw-copy-dsc.jpg   For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-impp-1202-08-o%252b1975-toyota-celica%252bstretched-tires.jpg  
curly is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 12:22 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,163
Total Cats: 651
Default

I disagree completely. Your Rival setup is obviously unsafe. I'll help you out by PM'ing my shipping address.

BTW, the GRM article is in the December 2013 issue. Pretty sure you have the exact setup that was tested.
hornetball is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:32 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,280
Total Cats: 178
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by curly View Post
Ha! Apparently you don't read enough around here to see the idiots we make fun of. That is not stretch, it's just an absence of bulge.
That's probably the problem, actually. He is so shell shocked by all of the immediate and knee-jerk venom spewed by anyone who even mentions words like "stretch" (in relation to tires) or "drift," that he just assumed they were a product of the Devil. And not in a good way.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:54 PM
  #15  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 1,745
Default

Codrus. You have perfection and don't even know it.

Attached Thumbnails For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-95r_brp_0413a.jpg  
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.27 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:55 PM
  #16  
Destroyer of Inconel
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: *** BANNED ***
Posts: 9,604
Total Cats: 973
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac View Post
Looks fine, the big rim protector just exaggerates the look.
Originally Posted by k24madness View Post
Looks great to me. The rim protector is exaggerating the stretch.
Agreed. It's not stretch/stance, its the rim protector. Remember these were "designed" to fit on a much narrower range of rims. We are definitely outside the manufacturers specs with our 1:1 fitments. Drive it and see if you like it. If you don't like it aesthetically, well, that's CR talk Proof is in the pudding, so to speak. Haters gonna hate, etc, etc.

My 225 RS3 on 15x9 look like that and my 205 S.drive on 15x8 look like that. I'll snap you a pic at lunchtime.
EO2K is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 01:58 PM
  #17  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,287
Total Cats: 124
Default

On my old E30, the 215/40 RT-615 on 17x8 SSRs looked the same as well. No biggie.

Attached Thumbnails For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...-dsc01581.jpg  
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 02:41 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 4,449
Total Cats: 525
Default

OK, I'm convinced, I'll bolt 'em on tonight. Thanks folks!

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 03:12 PM
  #19  
Destroyer of Inconel
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: *** BANNED ***
Posts: 9,604
Total Cats: 973
Default

I mean, I guess 225 is a tiny little stretched on a 9? All things being equal 225mm comes out to 8.86" treadwidth, but that's literally 0.07" per side. Not sure how precisely tires are measured though so probably does not matter.
EO2K is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 03:25 PM
  #20  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 12,716
Total Cats: 658
Default

225 is related to the actual measurement about as much as 949 is related to the slammed crowd.

Which means, not at all.

All 225 tires probably measure within +/- 10mm, which is quite a bit different than all the 225 measurements on a ruler, which are +/- 0mm.
curly is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: For some reason I thought 225 Rivals would fit properly on 15x9 6ULs...


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.