sonofthehill sets his sights on MK ULTRA
#61
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,075
Total Cats: 552
I was so happy with the catch can(working well a couple cc every couple hundred miles.) I decided to do another one on the exhaust side venting to the air filter.
I mainly wanted to try and get rid of an unburnt fuel smell I get sometimes at full boost. I have everything else sealed well, no exhaust leaks. The only thing I can think of is the filter on the exhaust side crankcase vent.
So far so good, it's a bit cold and I need my windows open to tell. I did have a good open window pull today and I didn't notice anything.
Seriously need to spend a little time making a bracket or 2 for these.
Gold one from harbor freight, black one from home depot. Very slight differences.
I am starting to hate this bracket(old horn bracket)
I mainly wanted to try and get rid of an unburnt fuel smell I get sometimes at full boost. I have everything else sealed well, no exhaust leaks. The only thing I can think of is the filter on the exhaust side crankcase vent.
So far so good, it's a bit cold and I need my windows open to tell. I did have a good open window pull today and I didn't notice anything.
Seriously need to spend a little time making a bracket or 2 for these.
Gold one from harbor freight, black one from home depot. Very slight differences.
I am starting to hate this bracket(old horn bracket)
#63
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,075
Total Cats: 552
Just a 1/4npt fitting force threaded into a 7/16 hole in the thick rubbery plastic top of my crappy air filter. After one of your catch cans of course. The home depot one was twice as much but slightly different we'll see how it holds up.
#64
Interesting. Could the same end goal be achieved by running a one seperator set up, but plumbing both lines from the valve cover into one seperator, using the IM source for Vac? Obviously in a configuration that would keep you from "boosting" your crankcase.
Seperators work pretty well, but the one hooked to your air filter will still put oily residue all over the inside of the whole IC piping system, eventually. At least the IM source will burn any remaining oil vapors
Seperators work pretty well, but the one hooked to your air filter will still put oily residue all over the inside of the whole IC piping system, eventually. At least the IM source will burn any remaining oil vapors
#65
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,075
Total Cats: 552
Unfortunately it won't work because I am trying to get rid of crankcase fumes while in full boost. The IM is full of pressure at that time so it won't suck the blow by in. The only other idea I had was to run the exhaust side breather through a long *** hose to a mini filter near the tailpipe. But I like that idea less. Maybe if you got clever with a port in the end of the tailpipe and a spark plug it could be cool. Could be dangerous too, try at your own risk.
I think pcv fumes in my lungs will cause problems eventually too, so I would rather clean my IC and charge piping at that time.
Very little oil collects in that side compared to the intake side. I think most of the time it is a source of clean air. Just not when my bomb *** modified pcv valve sees boost and seals up, then pcv vents out the exhaust side and I smell it.
I think pcv fumes in my lungs will cause problems eventually too, so I would rather clean my IC and charge piping at that time.
Very little oil collects in that side compared to the intake side. I think most of the time it is a source of clean air. Just not when my bomb *** modified pcv valve sees boost and seals up, then pcv vents out the exhaust side and I smell it.
#66
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Interesting. Could the same end goal be achieved by running a one seperator set up, but plumbing both lines from the valve cover into one seperator, using the IM source for Vac? Obviously in a configuration that would keep you from "boosting" your crankcase.
Seperators work pretty well, but the one hooked to your air filter will still put oily residue all over the inside of the whole IC piping system, eventually. At least the IM source will burn any remaining oil vapors
Seperators work pretty well, but the one hooked to your air filter will still put oily residue all over the inside of the whole IC piping system, eventually. At least the IM source will burn any remaining oil vapors
#67
If there are oil vapors it will lower the octane rating and can lead to detonation. Thats the whole point of the air/oil seperator. The point of having one plumbed to the intake and one free/intake piping is to get clean air flow through it and to get rid of nasty stuff. Hooking them both to the IM would not do this.
By another source, I was thinking a hose in the post-turbine exhaust stream. It always seems tough to get it to work properly (based on the threads I have read about it), but I wonder if possible once its revised a bit.
#68
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Thats what the catch can is for....
I have one of the exhaust venturi things. Forgot to weld it in last time I had the downpipe out. I've heard good and shitty things about them.
I have one of the exhaust venturi things. Forgot to weld it in last time I had the downpipe out. I've heard good and shitty things about them.
#73
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,075
Total Cats: 552
The only real source of vacuum in boost is the air filter/box.
Some fumes still seem to escape but it seems better than with just a mini filter. Maybe if I run a v8 OEM air box with a cold air duct I could keep the fumes contained. Maybe there is something I overlooked but there doesn't seem to be.