Built Turbo F20C Time Attack Miata
#141
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hubertus, WI
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 45
Have some more updates. My fabricator is moving shops in the next few weeks and the car should be rolling by this weekend! Cage is officially done and looks nutty, I will be going with a different seat to get in and out easier. Fabricated the wing mounts into the frame as well as the cage to make it super rigid! Quarters and fenders are now cut for the new flares.
Put the top on and hood to get an idea what it will look like! We will be able to run the car super low due to the drop spindles and clearance we made. Getting excited to get in on the ground.
Sorry for the cell phone pictures.
Put the top on and hood to get an idea what it will look like! We will be able to run the car super low due to the drop spindles and clearance we made. Getting excited to get in on the ground.
Sorry for the cell phone pictures.
#144
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hubertus, WI
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 45
Making slow progress as usual, my fab shop moved shops closer to a sheet metal shop that he will be working with on a future project. He will be learning how to use many new sheet metal tools and really looking forward to nice quality pieces for the firewall, rear firewall, rear floor, flat bottom, and diffuser.
After talking it over and over I am having him redo my a-arms. I wasn’t happy with the ones I have and rather than altering the current ones we will be making new ones.
Fuel system is taking shape; we offset the tank slightly to the passenger side. With the ATL fuel cell and Nuke Performance surge tank we should have no problems with fuel starvation. Some pictures for you guys.
The car will be at fab for a few more months. Material for my exhaust will be coming in sometime in February. This will be very exciting project that I have been dreaming of.
After talking it over and over I am having him redo my a-arms. I wasn’t happy with the ones I have and rather than altering the current ones we will be making new ones.
Fuel system is taking shape; we offset the tank slightly to the passenger side. With the ATL fuel cell and Nuke Performance surge tank we should have no problems with fuel starvation. Some pictures for you guys.
The car will be at fab for a few more months. Material for my exhaust will be coming in sometime in February. This will be very exciting project that I have been dreaming of.
#147
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
You still want to keep the weight between the axles if you can, in my experience.
this way the weight balance would be adjusted for feel with the chassis setup (ride height, alignment and aero compensation)... getting the 50/50 isn't as beneficial as keeping the car planted about the center of the car for the neutral feeling.
I would personally move it as far forward as possible like was mentioned. It just means you will need a bulkhead fitting and hose to connect for re-fuelling vs taking the trunk lid off.
this way the weight balance would be adjusted for feel with the chassis setup (ride height, alignment and aero compensation)... getting the 50/50 isn't as beneficial as keeping the car planted about the center of the car for the neutral feeling.
I would personally move it as far forward as possible like was mentioned. It just means you will need a bulkhead fitting and hose to connect for re-fuelling vs taking the trunk lid off.
#148
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hubertus, WI
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 45
You still want to keep the weight between the axles if you can, in my experience.
this way the weight balance would be adjusted for feel with the chassis setup (ride height, alignment and aero compensation)... getting the 50/50 isn't as beneficial as keeping the car planted about the center of the car for the neutral feeling.
I would personally move it as far forward as possible like was mentioned. It just means you will need a bulkhead fitting and hose to connect for re-fuelling vs taking the trunk lid off.
this way the weight balance would be adjusted for feel with the chassis setup (ride height, alignment and aero compensation)... getting the 50/50 isn't as beneficial as keeping the car planted about the center of the car for the neutral feeling.
I would personally move it as far forward as possible like was mentioned. It just means you will need a bulkhead fitting and hose to connect for re-fuelling vs taking the trunk lid off.
I will be finalizing a lot of stuff this weekend with the fabricator.
Appreciate the input!
#149
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
The idea of having the mass as close to the center of rotation as possible is the same as the one for flywheels. The same weight further from the center resists changes in rotation about the center more than when further inward. It will turn more nimbly if you keep it in.
#150
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hubertus, WI
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 45
The idea of having the mass as close to the center of rotation as possible is the same as the one for flywheels. The same weight further from the center resists changes in rotation about the center more than when further inward. It will turn more nimbly if you keep it in.
#156
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hubertus, WI
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 45
This is the second shop, 3rd time down to bare chassis.
Going on 3 years.
Luckily I finally found a true and passionate fabricator that cares about his work. Too many hack shops out there.
#158
if you could mail me that tubular rear subframe. that would be great. thanks.
__________________
OG Racing
Your Source For Motorsports Safety Equipment
WWW.OGRACING.COM
800.934.9112
703.430.3303
info@ogracing.com
OG Racing
Your Source For Motorsports Safety Equipment
WWW.OGRACING.COM
800.934.9112
703.430.3303
info@ogracing.com