The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
#2383
The FED's crystal ball
Fed officials warn of looming problems for economy
The FED looked into their crystal ball and told us how Obama's second term would begin. It seemed "the tanned one" John Boehnner came to Obama in the Spring, wanting to make a game plan that would dissipate the perfect storm of taxes and cuts. Obama said NO. As I recall he said NO to Simpson Bowles too. All of it.
Perhaps this is the fastest way to "transformative change"?
The FED looked into their crystal ball and told us how Obama's second term would begin. It seemed "the tanned one" John Boehnner came to Obama in the Spring, wanting to make a game plan that would dissipate the perfect storm of taxes and cuts. Obama said NO. As I recall he said NO to Simpson Bowles too. All of it.
Perhaps this is the fastest way to "transformative change"?
#2385
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Fed officials warn of looming problems for economy
The FED looked into their crystal ball and told us how Obama's second term would begin.
The FED looked into their crystal ball and told us how Obama's second term would begin.
Remember that, from a direct mathematical perspective as it relates to the fiscal budget deficit, $1 in spending cuts and $1 in tax increases are equivalent. Likewise, increasing spending and decreasing taxes are equivalent in their direct effect on the fiscal budget deficit.
#2387
Wouldn't that be a good thing, in your opinion? The large tax increases and significant spending cuts would help reduce the deficit considerably.
Remember that, from a direct mathematical perspective as it relates to the fiscal budget deficit, $1 in spending cuts and $1 in tax increases are equivalent. Likewise, increasing spending and decreasing taxes are equivalent in their direct effect on the fiscal budget deficit.
Remember that, from a direct mathematical perspective as it relates to the fiscal budget deficit, $1 in spending cuts and $1 in tax increases are equivalent. Likewise, increasing spending and decreasing taxes are equivalent in their direct effect on the fiscal budget deficit.
Personally I don't subscribe to the "broken window" theory, although the government actually does "print" money, it doesn't make money.
One would think the government taking more than half our money would be good enough:
Americans Will Work for More than 6 Months to Pay for Costs of Gov't in 2012 | CNSNews.com
#2388
And now for some lighter fare...
1. Harry Reid
A sexual position where you climb on top and then do absolutely nothing. Named for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). Under his lack of leadership, the Senate failed to pass a budget in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. He also blocked votes on numerous jobs bills passed by the House of Representatives.
1. Harry Reid
A sexual position where you climb on top and then do absolutely nothing. Named for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). Under his lack of leadership, the Senate failed to pass a budget in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. He also blocked votes on numerous jobs bills passed by the House of Representatives.
#2389
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
Wouldn't [the "Fiscal Cliff" that the Federal Reserve members are warning will lead to significant economic contraction] be a good thing, in your opinion? The large tax increases and significant spending cuts would help reduce the deficit considerably.
Remember that, from a direct mathematical perspective as it relates to the fiscal budget deficit, $1 in spending cuts and $1 in tax increases are equivalent. Likewise, increasing spending and decreasing taxes are equivalent in their direct effect on the fiscal budget deficit.
Remember that, from a direct mathematical perspective as it relates to the fiscal budget deficit, $1 in spending cuts and $1 in tax increases are equivalent. Likewise, increasing spending and decreasing taxes are equivalent in their direct effect on the fiscal budget deficit.
#2391
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
good read on CA situation:
Why do some cities in California go bankrupt while others are prospering? While Stockton, San Bernardino, Mammoth Lakes, and Valleho have all gone bankrupt in recent weeks, West Sacramento, according to its mayor, Christopher Cabaldon is surviving.
Cabaldon tweeted:
Rancho Cordova, 14 miles from West Sacramento, is not only surviving, but doing very well indeed; it has enjoyed eight straight years of surplus. Rancho Cordova City Manager Ted Gaebel said:
The city filed for bankruptcy because they claimed salaries and benefits for its public-safety workers were killing them. It had to close two of its fire stations and its police and firefighters are half the number of what they were. Only 10 percent of its roads have been fixed. Stuck with $10 million in legal fees, Mayor Osby Davis thinks that Vallejo would have done better to negotiate with the workers and says bankruptcy is a mistake:
Bankruptcy experts have said that cities are being bankrupted by weak property- and sales-tax revenues as their pension obligations keep growing. Stockton couldn’t agree with its employee unions and creditors on a plan to close a $26 million gap in its general fund. San Bernardino’s obligation to its employee retirement system doubled from 2007 to 2012. Pension spending grew an average of 11.4 percent a year in California’s biggest cities between 1999 and 2010, almost twice as fast as spending on public safety, social services, recreation, health and sanitation.
Is there a long-term solution in sight? Proposition 32 is trying to break through the brick wall of Democratic legislators and their union supporters by banning direct corporate and union contributions to state and local candidates, banning contributions by government contractors to the politicians who control contracts awarded to them, and banning automatic deductions by corporations, unions, and government of employees’ wages to be used for politics.
Will the people of California finally wake up?
Why do some cities in California go bankrupt while others are prospering? While Stockton, San Bernardino, Mammoth Lakes, and Valleho have all gone bankrupt in recent weeks, West Sacramento, according to its mayor, Christopher Cabaldon is surviving.
Cabaldon tweeted:
“4th CA city just voted to declare bankruptcy tonight, if you’re in West Sacramento worry not…our city is in solid fiscal shape.”
Cabaldon says the West Sacramento government has been cut 25 percent over the past 4 years, boasting, “We have, in West Sacramento, been making reductions, putting our fiscal house in order so we can make sure that our citizens will be protected.”Rancho Cordova, 14 miles from West Sacramento, is not only surviving, but doing very well indeed; it has enjoyed eight straight years of surplus. Rancho Cordova City Manager Ted Gaebel said:
“We don’t just pass a budget and hope things turn out ok in the hand, we manage a budget on a day to day basis. If that means cutting several million dollars during the year is what I need to do.”
Bankruptcy isn’t always the best way out, as the city of Vallejo discovered. The city filed for bankruptcy because they claimed salaries and benefits for its public-safety workers were killing them. It had to close two of its fire stations and its police and firefighters are half the number of what they were. Only 10 percent of its roads have been fixed. Stuck with $10 million in legal fees, Mayor Osby Davis thinks that Vallejo would have done better to negotiate with the workers and says bankruptcy is a mistake:
"It takes an enormous toll on everyone. And you have the stigma of being a bankrupt city. How do you come out of being labeled a bankrupt city to one that is a desirable place to live?"
But, of course, that is not so easy; unions have grown increasingly confident that with their Democratic buddies in the California Legislature, they’ll be protected. Bankruptcy experts have said that cities are being bankrupted by weak property- and sales-tax revenues as their pension obligations keep growing. Stockton couldn’t agree with its employee unions and creditors on a plan to close a $26 million gap in its general fund. San Bernardino’s obligation to its employee retirement system doubled from 2007 to 2012. Pension spending grew an average of 11.4 percent a year in California’s biggest cities between 1999 and 2010, almost twice as fast as spending on public safety, social services, recreation, health and sanitation.
Is there a long-term solution in sight? Proposition 32 is trying to break through the brick wall of Democratic legislators and their union supporters by banning direct corporate and union contributions to state and local candidates, banning contributions by government contractors to the politicians who control contracts awarded to them, and banning automatic deductions by corporations, unions, and government of employees’ wages to be used for politics.
Will the people of California finally wake up?
#2394
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
The 2012 Obama Version of the Little Red Hen
“Who will help me plant my wheat?” asked the little red hen.
“Not I,” said the cow.
“Not I,” said the duck.
“Not I,” said the pig.
“Not I,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself.” She planted her crop and the wheat grew and ripened.
“Who will help me reap my wheat?” asked the little red hen.
“I’m on disability,” said the duck.
“Out of my classification,” said the pig.
“I’d lose my seniority,” said the cow.
“I’d lose my unemployment compensation,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.
“Who will help me bake the bread?” asked the little red hen.
“That would be overtime for me,” said the cow.
“I’d lose my welfare benefits,” said the duck.
“I’m a dropout and never learned how,” said the pig.
“If I’m to be the only helper, that’s discrimination,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.
The smell of fresh-baked bread attracted all her neighbors. They saw the bread and wanted some. In fact, they demanded a share.
But the little red hen said, “No, I shall eat all the loaves.”
“Excess profits!” cried the cow.
“Capitalist leech!” screamed the duck.
“I demand equal rights!” yelled the goose.
“Share with the 99 percent,” grunted the pig.
And they all painted ‘Unfair!’ picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.
Then the farmer came He said to the little red hen, “You must not be so greedy.”
“But I earned the bread,” said the little red hen.
“Exactly,” said the farmer. “That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are idle.”
And they all lived happily ever after.
Alternative Dose-of-Reality Ending:
The little red hen never again baked bread and the farmyard suffered Greek-style chaos when the animals riding in the wagon suddenly discovered there was nobody left to pull the wagon.
“Who will help me plant my wheat?” asked the little red hen.
“Not I,” said the cow.
“Not I,” said the duck.
“Not I,” said the pig.
“Not I,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself.” She planted her crop and the wheat grew and ripened.
“Who will help me reap my wheat?” asked the little red hen.
“I’m on disability,” said the duck.
“Out of my classification,” said the pig.
“I’d lose my seniority,” said the cow.
“I’d lose my unemployment compensation,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.
“Who will help me bake the bread?” asked the little red hen.
“That would be overtime for me,” said the cow.
“I’d lose my welfare benefits,” said the duck.
“I’m a dropout and never learned how,” said the pig.
“If I’m to be the only helper, that’s discrimination,” said the goose.
“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.
The smell of fresh-baked bread attracted all her neighbors. They saw the bread and wanted some. In fact, they demanded a share.
But the little red hen said, “No, I shall eat all the loaves.”
“Excess profits!” cried the cow.
“Capitalist leech!” screamed the duck.
“I demand equal rights!” yelled the goose.
“Share with the 99 percent,” grunted the pig.
And they all painted ‘Unfair!’ picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.
Then the farmer came He said to the little red hen, “You must not be so greedy.”
“But I earned the bread,” said the little red hen.
“Exactly,” said the farmer. “That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are idle.”
And they all lived happily ever after.
Alternative Dose-of-Reality Ending:
The little red hen never again baked bread and the farmyard suffered Greek-style chaos when the animals riding in the wagon suddenly discovered there was nobody left to pull the wagon.
#2396
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Short version: from a direct caloric intake calculation, 100 calories from a jigger of bourbon is equal to 100 calories from a cup of vegetable soup.
I don't care about Nancy Pelosi's or Grover Norquist's math.
$100 million in spending increases and $100 million in tax cuts are equivalent in the deficit math [edit: but not necessarily in their GDP or employment impact]. I prefer tax cuts, especially in a household-oriented balance sheet recession.
It's like employment. Some people will applaud a 2 million worker reduction in the public sector but if there are only 1 million workers added in the private sector, you still have a net increase in the number of laid off workers.
#2397
Blech. My previous post got hung up and lost in the ether.
Short version: from a direct caloric intake calculation, 100 calories from a jigger of bourbon is equal to 100 calories from a cup of vegetable soup.
It's like employment. Some people will applaud a 2 million worker reduction in the public sector but if there are only 1 million workers added in the private sector, you still have a net increase in the number of laid off workers.
Short version: from a direct caloric intake calculation, 100 calories from a jigger of bourbon is equal to 100 calories from a cup of vegetable soup.
It's like employment. Some people will applaud a 2 million worker reduction in the public sector but if there are only 1 million workers added in the private sector, you still have a net increase in the number of laid off workers.
#2398
How crazy does this sound to you? Perhaps not very, especially coming from California where most homes seem to be upside down.
Gonzalo Lira: The Coming Middle-Class Anarchy
Gonzalo Lira: The Coming Middle-Class Anarchy
#2400
here's another good read
Here's another good read. This is what happens when the kids get the credit card, and why government needs less power.
Gonzalo Lira: A Beginner’s Guide to the European Debt Crisis
Gonzalo Lira: A Beginner’s Guide to the European Debt Crisis