Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2012, 01:59 PM
  #1301  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Is California real life?

This week, Los Angeles County okayed a new regulation banning the throwing of Frisbees or footballs on the beaches – which, of course, destroys the purpose of living in Southern California in the first place. The first offense will earn you a hefty $100 fine; the second, $200; the third and beyond, $500. You can, of course, apply for a permit. For parents with industrious children, holes deeper than 18 inches are also banned – so get your kids the cheap plastic shovels or pay a fine.

What’s the point of this law? Unless it’s to prevent horrific incidents like this, the only point is to raise cash for the state. This has become the MO for California law enforcement: higher ticket costs, more tickets written. California is now a police state – except when it comes to policing actual crime in hard-hit areas. The state, counties, and cities task police officers with going after soccer moms going 45 in a 35 zone rather than monitoring drug-ridden precincts.

The trend is obvious, and California motorists know it: as McClatchy reported back in August 2011, “As the state and cities wrestled with shrinking revenue and growing budget gaps, the California Highway Patrol issued about 200,000 more traffic citations in 2009 than it did two years before. Sacramento Superior Court, meanwhile, processed about 37,000 more traffic filings last year than in 2006 – a 16 percent increase.” The size of the fines has escalated dramatically, too: “With the average fine costing as much as $250 and rising, the increase in CHP tickets produced as much as $50 million over two years. That money went to state and local courts, crime labs and other purposes.”


While officials maintain that no edict has gone out to give more tickets, the politics of the situation is clear: California’s hard up for cash, and they’re willing to do virtually anything to raise it. That’s why in October, California created an “amnesty” plan for drivers with tickets older than January 2009 – if they paid up by the end of the year, they could pay half price. That wouldn’t disincentivize bad driving, of course – it would just raise money faster for the state. Meanwhile, liberals in California have rammed through a bill that blocks police from impounding cars of unlicensed drivers, mainly illegal immigrants – a measure that obviously increases vehicle danger, since illegal immigrants do not have insurance and are disproportionately likely to be involved in accidents. In fact, unlicensed drivers are five times more likely to be involved in traffic fatality accidents than licensed drivers.

So this isn’t about safety. It’s about cash, as always. This is how police states are created – by out-of-control spending requiring somebody to fork over more dough.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 06:16 PM
  #1302  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jared8783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

i never liked cali
jared8783 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:32 AM
  #1303  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default



Noteable quotes:

"we need a global minimum tax...[to ensure that]...nobody is escaping doing their fair share."

"shared scarifice to our greater good."

"democratic budget."

"And in terms of the revenues, the president is looking for shared sacrifice"


What the ----. Pure Evil.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:37 AM
  #1304  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

OMG. Seriously, the news today is killing me.

According to President Obama’s budget proposal today, his budget would continue “investment in program integrity by providing $1 billion to ensure benefits are paid to the right person and in the right amount.” Yes, you read that correctly: we are supposed to spend one thousand million dollars in order to achieve what American Express does correctly every single day (or, come to mention it, what the Dewey Decimal System did for books 100 years ago).
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:47 AM
  #1305  
Antisaint
iTrader: (17)
 
Vashthestampede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 4,564
Total Cats: 58
Default

My city was in the news yesterday, in a good way though.

Our mayor refused a $2.1 million grant for the local firefighters here in Danbury.

http://www.newstimes.com/news/articl...nt-3242091.php
Vashthestampede is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:33 AM
  #1306  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

don't worry, the unions will vote him out and ruin the state's budget and ultimately raise taxes in repsonse and ruin everything for eveyone.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:00 AM
  #1307  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opin...871e3ce6c.html

Walker's in deeeep ----. Uh oh!
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:22 AM
  #1308  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Obama violates that law errrr day.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:24 AM
  #1309  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by braineack
politicians violates the law errrr day.
ftfy
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:30 AM
  #1310  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

So like, that article, do they have any real evidence?
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:51 AM
  #1311  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
So like, that article, do they have any real evidence?
So, like, that bit about Obama, do you have any real evidence?

But, on a more serious note, they have enough evidence that Walker is meeting with the DA for "preliminary discussion" and caused Walker to hire two high-profile criminal defense attorney's.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:51 AM
  #1312  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I'm not writing articles about it, but I'm sure I could pull the criminal history of all his bros and then say he sucks as a president or something.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 12:05 PM
  #1313  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I'm not writing articles about it, but I'm sure I could pull the criminal history of all his bros and then say he sucks as a president or something.
Yes, but Obama hasn't exactly hired two high-profile criminal defense attorney's and is not meeting with a DA for a "preliminary investigation".
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 12:08 PM
  #1314  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Cool story.


Big Brother is watching you play COD:

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2012/02/13/c...ille-911-call/
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:22 PM
  #1315  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jared8783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

i just plain dont understand how someone could like obama and Ron Paul at the same time
yes im talkin bout u blaen
correct me if i am wrong please

as far as obama breaking the law goes
he did extend the patriot act. am i wrong?
dont forget bout NDAA fiscal year 2012
ya know that one he promised to veto then signed on new years eve

and no i am not saying this applies to obama breaking the law everyday
just to him breaking the law
jared8783 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:27 PM
  #1316  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by jared8783
i just plain dont understand how someone could like obama and Ron Paul at the same time
yes im talkin bout u blaen
correct me if i am wrong please

as far as obama breaking the law goes
he did extend the patriot act. am i wrong?
dont forget bout NDAA fiscal year 2012
ya know that one he promised to veto then signed on new years eve

and no i am not saying this applies to obama breaking the law everyday
just to him breaking the law
Where did I say I like Obama? Anywhere?

Obama is just superior to any of the non-Paul Republican choices. The same logic can be used in your argument for any non-Paul Republican choice as well as for Obama. I.e., how can you like Romney and Paul at the same time?
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:43 PM
  #1317  
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
FRT_Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
Default

Obama is my lord and savior.
FRT_Fun is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:39 PM
  #1318  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jared8783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
Where did I say I like Obama? Anywhere?

Obama is just superior to any of the non-Paul Republican choices. The same logic can be used in your argument for any non-Paul Republican choice as well as for Obama. I.e., how can you like Romney and Paul at the same time?
lets be nice and be friends please
no need to get defensive
then make a counter arguement

that is why i asked you to correct me if i am wrong
i wasn't 100% positive if you had said you liked obama or not

my arguement? republicans?
yeah i can honestly say i never even came close to even implying what it is you said i argued
i think you got me mixed up for brain

imo if RP isn't president then it don't matter who we get
everything is gonna end up the same way
i dont care if they are red or blue
they are all idiots in the white house

im writing in Ron Paul if i have too
jared8783 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:11 PM
  #1319  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jared8783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default


Last edited by Braineack; 10-08-2019 at 09:48 AM.
jared8783 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:28 PM
  #1320  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Sorry if I came off a bit strong Jared, didn't mean to come across as that way.

My "support" for Obama is of the "least worst" kind. It's the same as my "support" for Romney.

As an example, Romney is light years better than Gingrich or Santorum. But it doesn't mean I like or support Romney.
blaen99 is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.