DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

would it work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2007, 02:51 AM
  #1  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default would it work?

would a setup work having a small turbo off the manifold and a larger turbo downstream mounted similar to the STS idea? combined boost would be about 14psi. what do you guys think?
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-12-2007, 04:06 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
rmcelwee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pikeville, TN
Posts: 3,038
Total Cats: 27
Default

If I was a smart *** I would say to put 3 turbos on and get up to around 15 PSI...

Dual turbos isn't the best way to do it.
rmcelwee is offline  
Old 09-12-2007, 04:44 AM
  #3  
I'm Miserable!
 
drftem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: sandiego, CA
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 0
Default

yes it would work. theres an answer to your question. is it more efficient then running a single turbo at 14psi not really gunna notice a huge difference. if you went higher boost then you might. but yes it would work jut like a twin turbo setup.
drftem is offline  
Old 09-12-2007, 11:49 PM
  #4  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

anyone else?
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-12-2007, 11:51 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
UrbanSoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
Default

why do you need it? ive seen someone running twin turbo setup on m.net but if i recall correctly they didnt see any improvement at all.
UrbanSoot is offline  
Old 09-12-2007, 11:58 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Turbotim as the twin turbo setup here and it looks cool but wants to go bigger.
I think a better example of what you're talking about would be the RX-7 twin turbo. Pretty sure it's all one unit but one is for low end and the other is for top end. Most of those guys end up Upgrading to a single turbo because it's more efficient and easy to work on.
I don't see the point it making something harder than it needs to be. A T3s60 spools quickly and produces lots of power and they're not very expensive.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:21 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
firedog25's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 917
Total Cats: -8
Default

Wouldn't this be considered a two stage turbo set up? Small turbo spools for the low end and the big turbo for the high end? I believe Alfa Romeo has a two stage turbodiesel engine.
firedog25 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:40 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

The only way to do it correctly though is to have the exhaust gasses going to the smaller turbo cut off and divert to the larger one are some set point. IE complexity.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:48 AM
  #9  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

Well, I have almost all of the parts I would need on hand, so a small td04 9b off the manifold with a t3 downstream would work nicely. 7-8psi at just over 2000 rpm, 14psi from 3200 rpm to almost redline. When I pop the hood people will just see the tiny turbo, lol.

Should I run a collector before the intercooler with a single inlet, or run a dual inlet intercooler?
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:50 AM
  #10  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
The only way to do it correctly though is to have the exhaust gasses going to the smaller turbo cut off and divert to the larger one are some set point. IE complexity.
Why can't the downstream turbo run off the expelled gas from the first turbo?
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 01:05 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

It would slow down the gas velocity tremendously, and also lose alot of heat energy in the first turbo. You might as well be running a single rear mount turbo if thats what you want.....its been done :P
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 01:33 AM
  #12  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
It would slow down the gas velocity tremendously, and also lose alot of heat energy in the first turbo. You might as well be running a single rear mount turbo if thats what you want.....its been done :P
A 2.5in exhaust should allow enough hot exhaust gas to be forced through by the first turbo to spool the downstream turbo. It would be a lot hotter gas and more flow to the second turbo than just having the rear mount turbo by itself.
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 01:40 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
firedog25's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 917
Total Cats: -8
Default

Or have it divert via an external wastegate.
firedog25 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:17 AM
  #14  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'll take some measurements and see what might work.
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 08:25 AM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

your small turbo will run out fo steam fast, and when it does so, it simple becomes a restriction in the exhaust flow. Then it will start to produce hot air out of the compressor housing with no addition boost, and raise the EGTs.

it needs to be bypassed once the second turbo is spooled so the exhaust bypasses the small turbine and flow directly into the larger one.

fwiw, i think using a T3 as the large turbo is a retarded idea. the thing can make 15psi by 4000RPM. The boost onset is 1500-1800RPM.

why make something more complex for no reason?
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 08:50 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
marty_uiuc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: illinoisssss
Posts: 123
Total Cats: 0
Default

a friend of mine created a parallel/sequential big 16g twin turbo set-up for his DSM. it worked, sort of... at anything under 10psi both turbos would spool perfectly fine, but once he went over 10lbs the second turbo would just start to surge and never make any useable boost. so in the end, he had an incredibly complex (but unique) set-up that had mediocre at best performance. he spent years researching and designing this set-up, only to be frustrated and disappointed in the end.

so basically you can do it, but is it worth the frustration?
marty_uiuc is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 01:17 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
boostinsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
Default

Another thing is that when the bigger turbo takes over, the smaller turbo gets exhaust gasses routed around it. That is good, but what happens to the charge air? You just have a boost leak through the compressor of the smaller turbo.
boostinsteve is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 01:49 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,893
Total Cats: 399
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
Turbotim as the twin turbo setup here and it looks cool but wants to go bigger.
I think a better example of what you're talking about would be the RX-7 twin turbo. Pretty sure it's all one unit but one is for low end and the other is for top end. Most of those guys end up Upgrading to a single turbo because it's more efficient and easy to work on.
I don't see the point it making something harder than it needs to be. A T3s60 spools quickly and produces lots of power and they're not very expensive.
I choose turbos that were too small (Garrett has incorrect compressor maps on their website, their catalog has it fixed, dumb). They'd rock with the next-size-larger turbos. 240rwhp and extremely linear torque as it is now is fun though. If i was smart I'd leave the car A L O N E.

I'll be attempting sequential after my other projects are done, probably over the winter. I already got the turbos and part of the manifold modeled in solidworks. If it don't work, I'll throw it away and just use one turbo. I'm too old (gasp) to get too fustrated.

Last edited by TurboTim; 09-13-2007 at 02:01 PM.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 04:39 PM
  #19  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
zoom2zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by boostinsteve
Another thing is that when the bigger turbo takes over, the smaller turbo gets exhaust gasses routed around it. That is good, but what happens to the charge air? You just have a boost leak through the compressor of the smaller turbo.
the smaller turbo will still be boosting and pushing air through, so not sure what you meant?
zoom2zoom is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 04:52 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
jwarriner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 564
Total Cats: 1
Default

It's not the best idea. Enough said.
jwarriner is offline  


Quick Reply: would it work?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.