|
|||||||
| Methanol/Water Injection Place to talk about meth/water injection. |
Remove
advertisements today by clicking
here and subscribing. Only $3.50 per month. |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
So I've got this old Vortec FMU laying around...
![]() So what Im thinking is that I could essentially use it to make a water injection system that is progressive with boost pressure. The Pressure switch would switch on the water pump at say 5psi at which point it would be operating at a base pressure, but as the boost increases the FMU would increase the water pressure and consequently the amount of water being injected. I assume Im going to need a pretty high pressure pump in order to have good atomization initially and still give it headway to increase with boost. But anyway,give me some input. Hopefully Im not having a Hyper moment here
__________________
99 on low boost w/ BEGi Shanghai-S, CXracing FMIC |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links - Subscribe to remove this ad. |
|
|
#2 | ||
|
ARGHHHH MATEY
![]() |
The downfall for this idea, is that you need high pressure to properly atomize the water. So you would need a FMU that can handle already high pressures of like 100+ psi. What you are proposing is essentially a different implementation of already existing progressive controlled systems. They work by controlling pump speed which in turn controls pump pressure, or by sort of sending the pump a PWM signal to control output. Both are very rough implementations, with uneven atomization throughout the delivery range, and poor control overal of output. It might work though. Give it a try.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Hm, I always assumed other progressive systems worked by pulsing a solenoid at varying frequencies, like its done with nitrous. Which if anybody has ever seen a dyno of such systems you realise how poor power delivery is. Which is why I thought this would be significantly better.
So I guess progressive systems already use progressive pressure. Are there issues with control using a PWM signal? I would imagine that there is a non-linear relationship between motor speed and pumping. The RRFPR/FMU would be a very linear relationship. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Elite Member
![]() |
Ok, maybe I'm an idiot and can't see the obvious answer here.
How is an FPR going to alter pressure at the WI pump? I know how the vortec works on a fuel system with a RETURN line. How exactly would you plumb this into the WI plumbing? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
you would basically set it up just like a fuel system. It would have a static FPR with the FMU on the return, so you would have a return to the reservoir.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Tea, Earl Grey, hot.
![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
I though for liquids (incompressible) there is a linear relationship between pressure and flow, but I may be wrong, Im not sure what principle explains the relationship between pressure and flow
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Megahellastylin
![]() |
Joe is absolutely right. Flow does not increase linearly with pressure. For empirical confirmation, look at some of the nozzle charts that show flow versus delta-P. They are not linear.
Here is the equation for incompressible flow through an orifice. Key equation feature, the flow rate is a function of the square root of the pressure differential. Not linear. ![]() More information here. It is a discussion on orifice plates, but the same principle applies. Orifice plate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia As with any non-linear curve you can make short interval linear extrapolations to approximate the difference in flow. But, the farther you extrapolate, the larger the error.
__________________
Archie Gates: The way it works is, you do the thing you're scared shitless of, and you get the courage AFTER you do it, not before you do it. Conrad Vig: That's a dumbass way to work. It should be the other way around. Archie Gates: I know. That's the way it works. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
ooooh I see, so in other words the electronic way is a better route to a linear increase because you could program the speed of the pump vs. map in order to make a linear relationship, or any other type of curve you want.
I guess ill just try to sell this FMU to some poor soul, haha |
||
|
|
|