What's the deal with motor mounts?!?!?
#1
What's the deal with motor mounts?!?!?
When I swapped my 1.8 engine the old mounts where torn in two. Obviously very unsafe. So now I swapped the engine and it had fresh motormounts with it. BUUUT I was under the car the other day and the driver's side mount is "tearing". Anyway, am I doing something wrong? Is there an issue with motor mounts in general? The engine is NON-TURBO. Not a whole lot of torque going on here. Anyone have an suggestions on a stiffer/meatier motor mount?
#5
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
By MS, are your guys referring to MazdaSpeed? I'm pretty sure the MSMs got the same mounts as everybody else. There's no obvious distinction in the Collision Guide that says otherwise, though I don't have a full '04-'05 parts catalog at hand.
Or are we talking about MC, as in MazdaComp P/N NAY1-39-040? I personally found the MC mounts to be notably stiffer than my un-torn stock mounts, yet entirely livable in my daily driver.
Or are we talking about MC, as in MazdaComp P/N NAY1-39-040? I personally found the MC mounts to be notably stiffer than my un-torn stock mounts, yet entirely livable in my daily driver.
#8
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
Gotcha. I wish people would stop calling them MS / MSM parts. Pretty sure no such thing exists.
As for the MazdaComp mounts insofar as NVH is concerned, you notice it the first time you start the car after making the change, and then it just goes away and never bothers you again. Seriously, they are by no means solid mounts, and anyone who says otherwise has never driven a car with solid mounts in it. I'd consider them perfectly suitable for any spirited daily driver.
As for the MazdaComp mounts insofar as NVH is concerned, you notice it the first time you start the car after making the change, and then it just goes away and never bothers you again. Seriously, they are by no means solid mounts, and anyone who says otherwise has never driven a car with solid mounts in it. I'd consider them perfectly suitable for any spirited daily driver.
#9
Sorry Joe, just following the precedent set forth in this particular thread, kinda like in the "latest Ken Block video" thread where I called the desert-dwelling-"RPG"-wielding fellow a "terrorist" when he would be more accurately described as an insurgent.
Shame on you Savington (please don't kill me).
Shame on you Savington (please don't kill me).
#10
If you want solid mounts then billet is the only way to go! Little $$ though!
Racing Engine Mounts for Mazda MX-5 Miata/Eunos Roadster | Function7 Engineering
Racing Engine Mounts for Mazda MX-5 Miata/Eunos Roadster | Function7 Engineering
#16
I seem to remember a thread either here or elsewhere of someone putting in one MMR mount and one MS mount. The MMR on passenger side and the MS on the driver. It provided a best of both worlds sort of response. It was stiffer that MS only but didn't rattle your teeth like MMR only. Seems like a good idea to me and im probably going to be doing it soon. My stock mounts are all over the place. Any one interested in buying my second MMR mount to do the same when I get them?
#17
Despite my rear view shaking on my etc i like my mmr mounts they are solid and the **** does not shift around on my but hell im not one of those wine and cheesers that worrys about comfort to much, just fast and well faster still.
At 35 bucks the mmrs are cheap enough to try for anyone man
At 35 bucks the mmrs are cheap enough to try for anyone man
#18
I've had the MMR's before as well Magna. I totally agree on them being amazing at controlling engine torquing. They improved throttle response unlike anything I have ever seen. When you give it gas the car just goes immediately.
My biggest complaint was the shaking at idle. Which I guess is to be expected. I'm no wine and cheeser by any stretch. For a car I was planning to drive around often though in city traffic about 50% it would have been just too uncomfortable. I plan on trying the 50/50 MS and MMR mount.
My biggest complaint was the shaking at idle. Which I guess is to be expected. I'm no wine and cheeser by any stretch. For a car I was planning to drive around often though in city traffic about 50% it would have been just too uncomfortable. I plan on trying the 50/50 MS and MMR mount.
#19
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Argh. Link to the MMRs please. I don't like my gear shifter moving around because the passengers see it and think my car is broken.
I searched the interweb and I can't find these MMRs you people speak of.
I searched the interweb and I can't find these MMRs you people speak of.
#20
MMR-Direct.com
If you're worried about your passengers' reaction, you'll be replacing "Why does your shifter move?" with "Why does your car feel like an earthquake?".
If you're worried about your passengers' reaction, you'll be replacing "Why does your shifter move?" with "Why does your car feel like an earthquake?".