another know it all.
#1
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
another know it all.
read post #3. I've read so many posts where this dude goes on a wild tangent that stock fuel pumps cannot provide enough flow at 60psi. Am I wrong or should the returnless still work in the exact same manner as I posted?
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=210531
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=210531
#7
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
yeah, see i dont see why he thinks the stock pump cant fuel for 200hp at 60psi. it's dependent on what the injectors can flow at 60psi.
Previous posts from him state that his fuel pressure rapidly decreases after 5k, even with the 255, but not as much so.
I still think it's all the same except we can run a fmu and he can't.
Previous posts from him state that his fuel pressure rapidly decreases after 5k, even with the 255, but not as much so.
I still think it's all the same except we can run a fmu and he can't.
#9
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
I'm still running the stock fuel rail on my '99. I'm using a Walbro 255hp which raised the idle pressure from 60-61 with the stock pump to about 70 psi.
I also added a resrictor at the fpr and I'm seeing 80psi at idle, along with the RC650cc injectors. It runs fine and I don't seem to be running out of fuel at this time. Although I still may consider a dual feed.
I also added a resrictor at the fpr and I'm seeing 80psi at idle, along with the RC650cc injectors. It runs fine and I don't seem to be running out of fuel at this time. Although I still may consider a dual feed.
man, 650s...running close to 400rwhp with that thing?
#12
I'm running ~205rwhp on a stock fuel system, just bigger injectors (310cc) and EMU, it runs fine and I have enough fuel. So what they're saying is that if I get a bigger fuel pump(190lph) I'll pick up more hp because I'll be able to maintain fuel pressure better? I'm totally lost here. And what's up with returnless fuel line on 99s, why is it so bad?
#13
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
I think it is totally plausable.
The injectors source fuel from a pressurized rail. If the injectors remove fuel from the rail faster than the fuel pump can replace it, fuel pressure in the rail will drop.
<edit> the stock 99 injectors at 70 psi flow 8% more than at 60 psi. The stock ecu won't have any issue handling that.
The injectors source fuel from a pressurized rail. If the injectors remove fuel from the rail faster than the fuel pump can replace it, fuel pressure in the rail will drop.
<edit> the stock 99 injectors at 70 psi flow 8% more than at 60 psi. The stock ecu won't have any issue handling that.
__________________
91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing
Last edited by Ben; 12-04-2006 at 09:29 PM.
#15
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Also, the NA ecu expects an increase in fuel rail pressure with high demand, so an injector squirt event doesn't necessarily have to lengthen in time to increase fuel delivery. But if rail pressure dropped, the squirt event can be lengthened to compensate. The NB ecu expects a constant fuel rail pressure and therefor must increase the length of the squirt event. The squirt event can only last so long, so if fuel pressure dropped, the motor won't be fueled properly.
I've never owned or worked on an NB. If I'm wrong tell me.
I've never owned or worked on an NB. If I'm wrong tell me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikeflys1
Miata parts for sale/trade
15
10-27-2018 02:19 PM
Mikel
MEGAsquirt
29
09-14-2015 09:11 AM