How (and why) to Ramble On your domestic shorthair - Page 1215 - Miata Turbo Forum -Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-22-2015, 03:33 PM   #24281
Elite Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,190
Total Cats: 325
Default

If you're going to put them in the freezer, they need to be pigs or cows or rabbits.
rleete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2015, 03:35 PM   #24282
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 419
Total Cats: 30
Default

2030 Miata will be fusion powered.
Itty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 12:34 PM   #24283
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,334
Total Cats: 67
Default Technology leads science, not vice versa, and public funding of research

The Myth of Basic Science - WSJ

Some quotes

--

"Most technological breakthroughs come from technologists tinkering, not from researchers chasing hypotheses. Heretical as it may sound, “basic science” isn’t nearly as productive of new inventions as we tend to think."

"Suppose Thomas Edison had died of an electric shock before thinking up the light bulb. Would history have been radically different? Of course not. No fewer than 23 people deserve the credit for inventing some version of the incandescent bulb before Edison, "we know of six different inventors of the thermometer, three of the hypodermic needle, four of vaccination, five of the electric telegraph, four of photography, five of the steamboat, six of the electric railroad. The history of inventions, writes the historian Alfred Kroeber, is “one endless chain of parallel instances.”

"Increasingly, technology is developing the kind of autonomy that hitherto characterized biological entities. The Stanford economist Brian Arthur argues that technology is self-organizing and can, in effect, reproduce and adapt to its environment. It thus qualifies as a living organism, at least in the sense that a coral reef is a living thing. Sure, it could not exist without animals (that is, people) to build and maintain it, but then that is true of a coral reef, too."

The implications of this new way of seeing technology—as an autonomous, evolving entity that continues to progress whoever is in charge—are startling. People are pawns in a process. We ride rather than drive the innovation wave. Technology will find its inventors, rather than vice versa. Short of bumping off half the population, there is little that we can do to stop it from happening, and even that might not work.

Simultaneous discovery and invention mean that both patents and Nobel Prizes are fundamentally unfair things. And indeed, it is rare for a Nobel Prize not to leave in its wake a train of bitterly disappointed individuals with very good cause to be bitterly disappointed.

Patents and copyright laws grant too much credit and reward to individuals and imply that technology evolves by jerks. Recall that the original rationale for granting patents was not to reward inventors with monopoly profits but to encourage them to share their inventions. A certain amount of intellectual property law is plainly necessary to achieve this. But it has gone too far.

Politicians believe that innovation can be turned on and off like a tap: You start with pure scientific insights, which then get translated into applied science, which in turn become useful technology. So what you must do, as a patriotic legislator, is to ensure that there is a ready supply of money to scientists on the top floor of their ivory towers, and lo and behold, technology will come clanking out of the pipe at the bottom of the tower.

Yet recent scholarship has exposed this tale as a myth, or rather a piece of Prince Henry’s propaganda. Like most innovation, Portugal’s navigational advances came about by trial and error among sailors, not by speculation among astronomers and cartographers. If anything, the scientists were driven by the needs of the explorers rather than the other way around.

Technological advances are driven by practical men who tinkered until they had better machines; abstract scientific rumination is the last thing they do.

It follows that there is less need for government to fund science: Industry will do this itself. Having made innovations, it will then pay for research into the principles behind them. Having invented the steam engine, it will pay for thermodynamics. This conclusion of Mr. Kealey’s is so heretical as to be incomprehensible to most economists, to say nothing of scientists themselves.

For more than a half century, it has been an article of faith that science would not get funded if government did not do it, and economic growth would not happen if science did not get funded by the taxpayer. It was the economist Robert Solow who demonstrated in 1957 that innovation in technology was the source of most economic growth—at least in societies that were not expanding their territory or growing their populations.

In 2003, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development published a paper on the “sources of economic growth in OECD countries” between 1971 and 1998 and found, to its surprise, that whereas privately funded research and development stimulated economic growth, publicly funded research had no economic impact whatsoever. None. This earthshaking result has never been challenged or debunked. It is so inconvenient to the argument that science needs public funding that it is ignored.

In 2007, the economist Leo Sveikauskas of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics concluded that returns from many forms of publicly financed R&D are near zero and that “many elements of university and government research have very low returns, overwhelmingly contribute to economic growth only indirectly, if at all.”

As the economist Walter Park of American University in Washington, D.C., concluded, the explanation for this discrepancy is that public funding of research almost certainly crowds out private funding. That is to say, if the government spends money on the wrong kind of science, it tends to stop researchers from working on the right kind of science.

To most people, the argument for public funding of science rests on a list of the discoveries made with public funds, from the Internet (defense science in the U.S.) to the Higgs boson (particle physics at CERN in Switzerland). But that is highly misleading. Given that government has funded science munificently from its huge tax take, it would be odd if it had not found out something. This tells us nothing about what would have been discovered by alternative funding arrangements.

And we can never know what discoveries were not made because government funding crowded out philanthropic and commercial funding, which might have had different priorities. In such an alternative world, it is highly unlikely that the great questions about life, the universe and the mind would have been neglected in favor of, say, how to clone rich people’s pets.

The perpetual-innovation machine that feeds economic growth and generates prosperity is not the result of deliberate policy at all, except in a negative sense. Governments cannot dictate either discovery or invention; they can only make sure that they don’t hinder it. Innovation emerges unbidden from the way that human beings freely interact if allowed. Deep scientific insights are the fruits that fall from the tree of technological change.
JasonC SBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 01:37 PM   #24284
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fooger03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,047
Total Cats: 178
Default

There are very few things in the world which government intervention provides a net positive outcome. Science has rarely been one of them.
fooger03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 03:27 PM   #24285
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,817
Total Cats: 270
Default

Question for builder/construction guys:

I know I'm supposed to wet the concrete for 10 days after pouring the slab.
How much water should I use?

I can only hose the concrete once a day, in the evening.
Temps are in the 40-50F range.

I have been leaving about 1/2 inch of standing water on the concrete for the past 3 days, and I find the surface "damp" the next day.

Should I keep doing this, or am I ruining the concrete?

Here's the said lift foundation, depth is over a foot.

Attached Thumbnails
How (and why) to Ramble On your domestic shorthair-80-sx5tju_c760e5e9e5ea8de7184c2238166c27c4e295d088.jpg  
Godless Commie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 03:53 PM   #24286
Elite Member
 
Chiburbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilberts, IL
Posts: 1,960
Total Cats: 106
Default

Wasn't someone here a concrete guy? Vash maybe?
Chiburbian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 04:02 PM   #24287
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 18,769
Total Cats: 324
Default

you can put down something on top of the concrete that will hold moisture... like burlap or straw or something.

but if it is still damp, I'd think you're doing ok.
y8s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 04:02 PM   #24288
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Pond, ME
Posts: 670
Total Cats: 15
Default

Yes, Vash is the guy to ask. When I re-capped my walk earlier this year, I tried to wet it constantly for a week, based on stuff from this thread and other similar ones I found - Keeping Concrete Wet During Curing - Construction - Contractor Talk

From that, it seems to me that you're doing it right.
xturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 04:12 PM   #24289
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fooger03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,047
Total Cats: 178
Default

wet it for a day and you're already doing better than most concrete pads in the U.S.

It'll absorb moisture almost forever.
fooger03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 04:35 PM   #24290
Elite Member
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 159
Default

Any wire or rebar in there?
DNMakinson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 04:49 PM   #24291
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,817
Total Cats: 270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNMakinson View Post
Any wire or rebar in there?
There's some rebar. Not much.

I talked to an architect who is heavily involved in concrete structures, and he told me rebar would not be needed at all for what I am doing.

Also, lift specs call for 3000 psi concrete, what we poured in there is rated roughly at 4350 psi.
Godless Commie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 06:22 PM   #24292
SOMEOFIT
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,514
Total Cats: 219
Default

So dead in the office right now...

I've been playing snes roms for 2 hours
Girz0r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2015, 10:50 PM   #24293
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 24,679
Total Cats: 1,576
Default

"Oh bother!", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.
Joe Perez is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 10:11 AM   #24294
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Marylandistan
Posts: 679
Total Cats: 26
Default

Merry Christmas and happy holidays gayz!!

Hopefully santa brought you a new klutch, or a rear mount turbo or a bell intake manifold that doesn't work. May you confess all the mistakes you have made in your career.
stratosteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 03:50 PM   #24295
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,876
Total Cats: 486
Default

Finally found a game worth playing on facebook.

Man the memories.
https://apps.facebook.com/contra_/
triple88a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 08:53 PM   #24296
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,817
Total Cats: 270
Default

Happy Festivus to all...

May the inside of your engines never see the light of the day.


Attached Thumbnails
How (and why) to Ramble On your domestic shorthair-80-nlcgsm_d29241ddcf9bafcbad76c0b7e5b6a11296c281a7.png  
Godless Commie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 08:57 PM   #24297
SOMEOFIT
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,514
Total Cats: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Commie View Post
Heheheheeh


Girz0r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 01:57 AM   #24298
Destroyer of Inconel
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In ur driveway, abusin' ur WPA
Posts: 8,764
Total Cats: 750
Default

I'm sitting here watching Emmit Otter's Jug Band Christmas and doing tequila shots with my wife and 60 year old mother in law. I'm gonna pay for this tomorrow!
EO2K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 09:55 AM   #24299
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,430
Total Cats: 1,015
Default

90-05 MAXDA MIATA MX5 HARD TOP

Miata Hardtop $550



There's a gift to yourself.
Attached Thumbnails
How (and why) to Ramble On your domestic shorthair-00w0w_khjsdiibai5_600x450.jpg  
sixshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2015, 02:18 AM   #24300
SOMEOFIT
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,514
Total Cats: 219
Default

So I was too lazy to go find the "fuu I'm drunk" thread so... this sticky one gets the post.

12:17am, work @ 8am. Still haven't shaken off leh drunks from rum etc etc with coworkers & boss. Already working from home tomorrow which means more browsing to your posts in the meantime.

Hi.
Girz0r is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uconn Car Show 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 1 01-23-2016 10:17 PM
Uconn Car Show Sat, April 9th 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 7 04-11-2011 11:00 AM
Uconn Car Club Spring 2010 Show 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 92 04-12-2010 06:20 PM
anual uconn car show/meet 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 0 02-19-2008 10:03 PM


Tags
brain <3 me, brainy <3s hollywood, cancerous testicles, cuban caveman, furry barnacle, get fragged faeflora, joe p for prez, lyrical joe perez, not hit block, peter falk

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.