How (and why) to Ramble On your domestic shorthair - Page 335 - Miata Turbo Forum -Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2011, 12:51 PM   #6681
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 28,966
Total Cats: 327
Default

GF is getting serious about moving to RI. I don't know if I can make that trip. Do I pick my career, racing, low taxes, Texas winter, and affordable housing over my GF? I think so.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 12:57 PM   #6682
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,323
Total Cats: 182
Default

How many tracks are there in RI?
Reverant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:07 PM   #6683
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,275
Total Cats: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverant View Post
How many tracks are there in RI?
How many eligible, willing, and gorgeous girls are in Texas?

Seems a no-brainer to me
olderguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:09 PM   #6684
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 28,966
Total Cats: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olderguy View Post
How many eligible, willing, and gorgeous girls are in Texas?

Seems a no-brainer to me
Yep, I'll ride this one as long as possible. Hopefully she'll wise up and realize that she can either "take a dream job" or find a reasonable job, live off both of our incomes, and buy a house while keeping me around. I presume that I'm not a very pleasant person to be around when I haven't been to the track in a few months.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:10 PM   #6685
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 505
Total Cats: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
Yep, I'll ride this one as long as possible.
Does she ride you too?
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:14 PM   #6686
Crumple Zone Tester
iTrader: (6)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,481
Total Cats: 373
Default

If it's not absolutely and immediately clear that you want to stick with her no matter what, then stay in TX.
mgeoffriau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:29 PM   #6687
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 28,966
Total Cats: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau View Post
If it's not absolutely and immediately clear that you want to stick with her no matter what, then stay in TX.
I want to stick with her. However, I prefer every other aspect of my life here in Texas. If I don't have a job, can't own a track car, can't go to the track, and have to deal with winter I may no appreciate life too much.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:32 PM   #6688
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
pusha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,363
Total Cats: -28
Default

Girls come and go but your bros will be with you to the end.

We ride together, we die together (I am on the right).

pusha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 01:36 PM   #6689
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 28,966
Total Cats: 327
Default

http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...e-for-shutdown
Quote:
With the first government shutdown in 15 years looming as a real possibility, the White House, no matter what it says, will need to prepare.
The Obama administration has been adamant that a shutdown can be avoided and that a deal can still be reached. Congressional lawmakers are still haggling over passing a continuing resolution (CR) that would fund the government beyond March 4, when the current CR expires.
“All four leaders of Congress, leaders of the House, leaders of the Senate, have expressed their confidence that we can work this out before March 4, and we believe we can,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday.
But as the window for reaching an agreement shrinks, the likelihood the administration will need to prepare for a shutdown increases.
The congressional schedule leaves roughly four days, during the week of Feb. 28, for Congress to craft a package it can agree on, and one that the president will sign, before the current CR expires.
Since 1980, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has required all federal agencies to establish shutdown contingency plans, including how long it would take to shut down the agency and the number of employees that would keep working in the absence of appropriations.
OMB policy states that the office will monitor the appropriations process, and will notify agencies if they need to begin their shutdown plans, which are not available to the public.
On Nov. 9, 1995, less than a week before the first government shutdown of his tenure, President Clinton ordered federal agencies to begin preparing for the event. The Obama administration has yet to make such an announcement.
Although the administration is tight-lipped about what exactly might happen during a shutdown, the last series of government shutdowns, in 1995 and 1996, provides clues as to what to expect.
When the Clinton-GOP standoff led to shutdowns, the public felt the impact in a variety of ways. All 368 national parks, museums and monuments were closed, and roughly 200,000 passport applications went untouched, according to a September 2010 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report. Veterans’ benefit checks were delayed and new Social Security claims were not registered.
An estimated 800,000 federal employees were furloughed for five days in 1995. A second shutdown weeks later, in 1996, after some short-term funding bills were passed, resulted in the three-week furlough of another 284,000 employees.
But those measures occurred a decade and a half ago, and the potential first shutdown since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 would affect a government that looks different in many ways from the one helmed by Clinton.
In 1996, the executive branch reported 1.9 million federal employees, excluding the Postal Service. By 2010, that number had climbed to 2.1 million, according to the president’s fiscal 2012 budget request.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), created after the Sept. 11 attacks, did not exist the last time the government came to a halt. DHS employs more than 230,000 people, and it is not clear how many of these would remain unscathed during a government shutdown. DHS employees who play key roles in national security matters would stay on, but the question of where the line gets drawn separating essential from non-essential is fuzzy.
OMB states that during a shutdown, certain employees can continue to work, including members of the military and law enforcement, or individuals involved in the direct delivery of healthcare. Employees paid with money separate from appropriations can also keep working.
In addition, agencies can keep on some employees who do not meet those specific exemptions, provided they are needed to “protect life and property,” according to OMB.
In a 1981 memo, then-OMB Director David Stockman spelled out several examples of employees who might meet that latter qualification. He listed air traffic controllers, public health officials and prison guards among several candidates, as well as employees who play a key role in the nation’s power distribution system or in guarding its borders or federal facilities.
There are few hard and fast rules for determining which employees need to stay on during a shutdown. During the 1996 standoff, the Social Security Administration (SSA) initially kept 4,780 employees on, because they were in positions necessary to ensure that various benefits, including Social Security, continued to be paid. The remaining 61,415 employees were furloughed, according to the CRS report.
However, the SSA realized shortly afterward that it lacked the manpower to answer phone calls from customers needing new cards or requesting that their files be changed to reflect a new address for benefit checks. Another 49,715 employees were brought back to help run the agency.
On Saturday, House Republicans hailed the passage of a CR that would cut at least $61 billion in federal spending when compared to 2010 levels. However, Senate Democrats, who still control the upper chamber, have shown little interest in taking up the measure, and are instead pushing for a package that would continue spending at current levels. And President Obama has already announced he would veto the House package if it made it to his desk.
Lawmakers have insisted they want to avoid a shutdown, but publicly there are few signs of flinching from either end. Republicans have said a short-term spending measure could prevent a shutdown if a broader agreement proves elusive, but House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters Feb. 17 that he would reject any package that did not include spending cuts. However, he also has been adamant that he wants to avoid a government shutdown, well-aware of the blame assigned to Republicans in charge of Congress during the shutdowns of the mid-1990s.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) upped the ante Tuesday, introducing a 30-day resolution that would fund the government at current spending levels. He also announced that he has instructed his chief of staff to work with Boehner’s to put together a long-term CR.
Democrats in both chambers are pushing legislation that would halt paychecks for lawmakers and the president during a government shutdown. While policymakers got paid during the 1995 and 1996 shutdowns, legislation introduced by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Bob Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) and Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) would stop that.
“If we’re going to throw federal employees, including our staffs, out on the street, we should be right there with them,” Moran said Friday. “In the event of a shutdown, members should be eating peanut butter and jelly like everyone else.”
Sam Youngman contributed to this report.
Let me get this straight...$14,000,000,000,000.00 deficit and Democrats do not want a reduction in spending, and the President will veto supporting this?
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 02:28 PM   #6690
Boost Czar

iTrader: (60)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 70,129
Total Cats: 1,401
Default



I work for dhs.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 02:28 PM   #6691
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Pond, ME
Posts: 669
Total Cats: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
.....she can either "take a dream job" or find a reasonable job....
If there's a "dream job" in RI, it will probably be moving closer to Texas soon anyway.
xturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 02:29 PM   #6692
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 12,196
Total Cats: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...e-for-shutdown

Let me get this straight...$14,000,000,000,000.00 deficit and Democrats do not want a reduction in spending, and the President will veto supporting this?
Arn't you technically a gov employee? So would where you work get shut down?
shuiend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 03:01 PM   #6693
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,165
Total Cats: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...e-for-shutdown

Let me get this straight...$14,000,000,000,000.00 deficit and Democrats do not want a reduction in spending, and the President will veto supporting this?
The way I understand it (could be a bit off here and there too buisy w/ school to watch the news every night lately) Pres. Obama put forth a budget for the next fiscal year making cuts, the GOP doesn't think that the cuts are deep enough so Obamas budget got changed while in congress, don't know how but thats what I thought I heard. I know for sure that it is not that Obama doesn't want to make cuts, its that the current budget was changed in a way that he sees as cause for a veto untell corrected in a way that (hopefully) we can all agree on.
gearhead_318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 03:10 PM   #6694
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
leatherface24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 4,031
Total Cats: 1
Default

This song is the ****. I love Jamiroquai

leatherface24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 04:02 PM   #6695
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 28,966
Total Cats: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318 View Post
The way I understand it (could be a bit off here and there too buisy w/ school to watch the news every night lately) Pres. Obama put forth a budget for the next fiscal year making cuts, the GOP doesn't think that the cuts are deep enough so Obamas budget got changed while in congress, don't know how but thats what I thought I heard. I know for sure that it is not that Obama doesn't want to make cuts, its that the current budget was changed in a way that he sees as cause for a veto untell corrected in a way that (hopefully) we can all agree on.
Obama's budget was not a cut, it did not reduce the budgetted amount, it was a "punt" for the next president to fund. I'm seriously worried about the financial health of this country considering the national debt is greater than the 100% total earnings of it's population annually. From what I've recently read, the USA can't even pay interest on it's deficit spending.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 04:08 PM   #6696
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,250
Total Cats: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
GF is getting serious about moving to RI. I don't know if I can make that trip. Do I pick my career, racing, low taxes, Texas winter, and affordable housing over my GF? I think so.
Dibs on sloppy seconds
Bond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 04:13 PM   #6697
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,275
Total Cats: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hustler View Post
Obama's budget was not a cut, it did not reduce the budgetted amount, it was a "punt" for the next president to fund. I'm seriously worried about the financial health of this country considering the national debt is greater than the 100% total earnings of it's population annually. From what I've recently read, the USA can't even pay interest on it's deficit spending.
I am posting the link to this nut through a site that is discrediting him so that I don't get flamed too much:

http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=21120

While he is trying to get people to send him money, he does make some very valid arguments here:

http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pr...VD/OPSIM106/PR

Watch/listen at your own risk.
olderguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 08:22 AM   #6698
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon.
Posts: 6,841
Total Cats: 63
Default

**** I was up too late lastnight....2am. I did manage to replace my turbo exhaust housing though. It only took me 6hrs from pulling the car in the garage to getting it done. The biggest PITA was the 4 studs from the outlet elbow to the downpipe though..that **** took me a good solid hour to get done. Other than that part, getting the turbo out, unbolting everything and replacing the housing wasn't bad.

To top it off, my subscription to htis forum suddenly stopped. Argh.

Oh and when I stopped to get smokes and a snack on my way to work, I got into a discussion with the owner of the station. He was showing me that his cost per gallon of gas yesterday was $3.07....and today it's $3.23. **** Big Oil, **** the government and **** the NYSE and their "futures" bullshit of price jacking because of some oil company **** that gets on TV and blabs about gas prices going up for ***** and giggles. I believe it's propaganda just so they can raise prices to keep their record profits and the government won't step in because all those ***** have large investments in oil.
Doppelgänger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 09:36 AM   #6699
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 12,196
Total Cats: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doppelgänger View Post
Oh and when I stopped to get smokes and a snack on my way to work, I got into a discussion with the owner of the station. He was showing me that his cost per gallon of gas yesterday was $3.07....and today it's $3.23. **** Big Oil, **** the government and **** the NYSE and their "futures" bullshit of price jacking because of some oil company **** that gets on TV and blabs about gas prices going up for ***** and giggles. I believe it's propaganda just so they can raise prices to keep their record profits and the government won't step in because all those ***** have large investments in oil.
I would disagree with your opinion on why gas prices are going up completely. Have you missed how gas production has been shut down in Libya? That will definitely cause a small supply shock and cause prices to go up. Also with the other middle eastern countries could be on the break of more peaceful revolution which will definitely cause more rises in oil cost's because of the unknowns of what will happen in the future.
shuiend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 09:56 AM   #6700
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon.
Posts: 6,841
Total Cats: 63
Default

Meh..I know my opinion is reactionary based, but they were starting with the gas prices **** before much was going on in the middle-east, when the stuff in Egypt was just happening and no other countries were participating. It was well over a month ago they started with the **** on the news of "$5 a gallon gas coming". Not like we don't have enough here in the US to keep prices from sharply increasing. I always love how the price can jump $.25 over night but takes weeks to come back down. Honestly, let's face it, they couldn't give a ***** less about how it effects millions of people, they just care about their pockets. But they do that futures crap of "oh well, it could go up in the future...so let's raise it now". The same goes with any large industry. Do you think wheat growers would care for the comsumers if breat was $10/loaf? Hell no, that would mean they're making bank on their crops and that $10 loaf would be nothing to them to buy. It's just frustrating to see. I, like many people, feel like the jumping prices are a punishment for something I didn't do. Looking around at all the shitty SUVs hauling one 100lb ***** around or that douchy guy using a Hummer to putz to work and back further frustrates me that those people aren't making things much better.
Doppelgänger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uconn Car Show 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 1 01-23-2016 10:17 PM
Uconn Car Show Sat, April 9th 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 7 04-11-2011 11:00 AM
Uconn Car Club Spring 2010 Show 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 92 04-12-2010 06:20 PM
anual uconn car show/meet 240_to_miata Local Meets, Events and Tech Days 0 02-19-2008 10:03 PM


Tags
brain <3 me, brainy <3s hollywood, cancerous testicles, cuban caveman, furry barnacle, get fragged faeflora, joe p for prez, lyrical joe perez, not hit block, peter falk

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.