Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Hyper is at it again.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2009, 10:32 PM
  #21  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by the_man
but I somehow doubt that it'd be too significant or we'd see fuel heating/cooling devices on more racing cars and whatnot. Hell, if it was that easy/cheap to increase performance, we'd see it on street cars.
It is my understanding actually that all F1 cars heat their fuel to aid in atomization. They use Toluene though which doesn't vaporize as well at the same temperature as gasoline.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 11:54 PM
  #22  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
magnamx-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
Default

The toulene is exactly why the heat it. In my 67 chevy i have found some decent gains almost as much from cold fuel as cold air. Granted this is a carbed V8 but still.
magnamx-5 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 12:06 AM
  #23  
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
FRT_Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
Default

I would think there might be a benefit of cooling down the Intake Air Temp a bit with colder fuel.

Either way, fuel cooling is pretty easy, but I just don't think there is any hard evidence it helps. In diesels yes, but it is usually to cool the fuel going back to the tank.
FRT_Fun is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:02 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
j_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
It is my understanding actually that all F1 cars heat their fuel to aid in atomization. They use Toluene though which doesn't vaporize as well at the same temperature as gasoline.
Huh? Are you sure? I think it is the opposite. They are trying to keep the fuel as cool as possible, but in the rules there is a minimum allowed temperature. So they have to be careful not to run cooler than the limit. It is also forbidden by the rules to run fuel coolers.

Quote from the Formula 1 rules:

6.5.4 No fuel on board the car may be more than ten degrees centigrade below ambient temperature.

6.5.5 The use of any device on board the car to decrease the temperature of the fuel is forbidden


Last edited by j_man; 05-18-2009 at 02:16 AM.
j_man is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:13 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
j_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Hyper
I am working on a new fuel cooling concept and I need to gather all the info I can get for this project. . If I am not clear, please let me know, my english sucks.

I need to know what is the fuel pressure before the dampener and after the dampener and what would be the best location to install a fuel pressure gauge, my gauge goes all the way to 100psi. I also need to know more details on the OEM pulsation dampener, thanks.

I rather keep the project undisclosed to the forum until I do some testing of the concept on 1st Florida Dyno day, June 6th. Are you coming?
Maybe he is trying to install a dampener to dampen his entire car with fuel and set it on fire.
NB Miatas stock have fuel damper, not dampener.


j_man is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 04:59 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
richyvrlimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington/Birmingham
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
Default

Originally Posted by j_man
Huh? Are you sure? I think it is the opposite. They are trying to keep the fuel as cool as possible, but in the rules there is a minimum allowed temperature. So they have to be careful not to run cooler than the limit. It is also forbidden by the rules to run fuel coolers.

Quote from the Formula 1 rules:

6.5.4 No fuel on board the car may be more than ten degrees centigrade below ambient temperature.

6.5.5 The use of any device on board the car to decrease the temperature of the fuel is forbidden
I thought F1 cooled fuel to increase tank capacity. Cooler fuel means it's slightly denser, means you can get more in the tank and have better tactical options.
richyvrlimited is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:23 AM
  #27  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Fidgitk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Murphy, Tx
Posts: 194
Total Cats: 11
Default

[QUOTE=the_man;409469]I've heard arguments made for both heating and cooling of fuel. I have never, however, heard any hard numbers one way or the other wherein the temperature of the fuel was correlated to HP or whatever, without any confounding variables messing up the deal. Maybe one way or the other makes a difference, maybe it doesn't, but I somehow doubt that it'd be too significant or we'd see fuel heating/cooling devices on more racing cars and whatnot. Hell, if it was that easy/cheap to increase performance, we'd see it on street cars.
QUOTE]

My Mercedes 190E 16V runs the fuel supply into a manifold that surrounds the A/C suction line, so when the A/C is running it cools the fuel down.
Not sure what their end goal was in doing it though.
Fidgitk is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 12:38 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
96rdstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 780
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fidgitk

My Mercedes 190E 16V runs the fuel supply into a manifold that surrounds the A/C suction line, so when the A/C is running it cools the fuel down.
Not sure what their end goal was in doing it though.
And that is the problem with cooling it with the A/C. Any benefits or power gains from cooler fuel is lost when the compressor kicks on. You mentioned that your 190E has it. IIRC, Mercedes abandoned that system a long time ago.
96rdstr is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:12 PM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BenR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,841
Total Cats: -7
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
It is my understanding actually that all F1 cars heat their fuel to aid in atomization. They use Toluene though which doesn't vaporize as well at the same temperature as gasoline.


I don't think they've used toluene since the 80's.
BenR is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 04:47 PM
  #30  
!!! NOT CONFIRMED !!!
 
LostSoulMiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 52
Total Cats: 0
Default

Why not use what's already available?

Mr. Gasket Cool Can - JEGS

Fuel Coolers at Flex-a-lite Consolidated

I've only seen them on Diesel's or Drag cars, why the need on a DD?
LostSoulMiata is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:20 AM
  #31  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
Default

Apparently I was incorrect in an assumption I made about the fuel flow in the '99, specifically the location where the fuel hit the regulator.

A much clearer set of images found in the parts catalog shows me that hte actual flow is from the pump, out to the fuel filter, then at the filter there is a tee, with one end feeding the rail and the other going back into the tank and hitting the FPR. This makes sense as you need to account for pressure drop across the filter, which I hadn't considered previously.

Here's a drawing I pieced together showing the complete system:
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 11:12 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Torkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norrahammar, Sweden
Posts: 611
Total Cats: 7
Default

Originally Posted by LostSoulMiata
Why not use what's already available?
Because Hyper is working on a "fuel cooler concept" which is sooo much cooler (no pun intended) then just ordering something from the web!!

Personally, I think we should encourage that the brilliant entrepreneur SERerformance (Mr high compression pistons, remember?) and engineering genius Hyper get together. With those two master minds joining force, the potential for true epic failure (and amusement for us all) is nothing less then enormous.
Torkel is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:10 PM
  #33  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Apparently I was incorrect in an assumption I made about the fuel flow in the '99, specifically the location where the fuel hit the regulator.

A much clearer set of images found in the parts catalog shows me that hte actual flow is from the pump, out to the fuel filter, then at the filter there is a tee, with one end feeding the rail and the other going back into the tank and hitting the FPR. This makes sense as you need to account for pressure drop across the filter, which I hadn't considered previously.

Here's a drawing I pieced together showing the complete system:
so in theory you could run an external FPR between the filter and dump and bypass the stock one?
y8s is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:33 PM
  #34  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
so in theory you could run an external FPR between the filter and dump and bypass the stock one?
I believe Bell does something similar to this.
Joe Perez is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satisfied
MEGAsquirt
144
11-05-2018 04:05 PM
d k
Race Prep
12
03-14-2018 06:33 PM
curly
MEGAsquirt
11
09-22-2015 11:54 AM
aidandj
Front Desk
7
09-02-2015 12:09 PM
thumpetto007
General Miata Chat
4
08-29-2015 03:49 PM



Quick Reply: Hyper is at it again.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.