Who's running AEM UEGO with MSI? Versus LC1
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Who's running AEM UEGO with MSI? Versus LC1
Who is running the AEM UEGO wideband setup with their MS? Who is this working well for? I'm having some issues with autotune working correctly as well as MLV. Neither work as they're supposed to. Both make my car go dangerously lean, leaving it very undrivable. IOW, lots of bucking and power loss due to the fuel maps being pretty much what I would call destroyed. I have the custom.ini files adjust appropriately and my target tables setup correctly as well. Pretty much no idea what the problem is and i've been trying to figure it out for a good amount of time now.
Is there any insight to this that I might be missing? I've done the code conversion to make megatune read exactly the same AFR as what comes up on the gauge, so that is very accurate. I have also done the code conversion to make it possible to enter AFR values in the target table instead of voltage values.
You can see the Volts to AFR conversion writeup here: http://forums.plastikracing.net/view...?p=52097#52097
The reading adjustment on the same forum by the same guy.
Is there any insight to this that I might be missing? I've done the code conversion to make megatune read exactly the same AFR as what comes up on the gauge, so that is very accurate. I have also done the code conversion to make it possible to enter AFR values in the target table instead of voltage values.
You can see the Volts to AFR conversion writeup here: http://forums.plastikracing.net/view...?p=52097#52097
The reading adjustment on the same forum by the same guy.
#3
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
I'm running the AEM UEGO gauge with my MSPNP and I've done the exact same things (code conversion to make megatune read exactly the same AFR as what comes up on the gauge, so that is very accurate. ... code conversion to make it possible to enter AFR values in the target table instead of voltage values.)
When you say MLV you mean the log viewer isn't working right or the VE Analyzer?
I am having no problems using MLV VE Analyzer at all. Autotune on the other hand I have never gotten to work because I've been too lazy to edit the parameters in the code
does what you are seeing for AFRs in the log correspond with what you saw during the logging run?
send me your current msq file and a log and let me see what my VE Analyzer does with it.
When you say MLV you mean the log viewer isn't working right or the VE Analyzer?
I am having no problems using MLV VE Analyzer at all. Autotune on the other hand I have never gotten to work because I've been too lazy to edit the parameters in the code
does what you are seeing for AFRs in the log correspond with what you saw during the logging run?
send me your current msq file and a log and let me see what my VE Analyzer does with it.
#6
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
I'm interested in hearing any updates about this issue as well as I just sent the money tonight for an AEM UEGO and plan to add a MS soon - are these not very compatible? If so I will return it immediately, I need something that will work with MS.
-Ryan
-Ryan
#7
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
They work perfectly and I recommend them over LC1s now just because they're easier to use and install.
You have to change the calibration a little to make the AEM and MS read exactly the same but that is easy. The link is in my signature.
You have to change the calibration a little to make the AEM and MS read exactly the same but that is easy. The link is in my signature.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM