Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2015, 04:54 PM
  #701  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

Definitely an Apollo. That splitter looks a lot like mine.

-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:41 PM
  #702  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1993ka24det's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Posts: 638
Total Cats: 57
Default

Originally Posted by humming
What car is that? looks like a gumpert apollo maybe?

It is a Gumper Apollo


Originally Posted by Der_Idiot
Is that a picture of the front end? Looks like it has a splitter followed by a recess to allow in air between the flat tray and the car? Could that feed air through the transmission tunnel and out the back by the diffuser?
And you are also right. For my setup it will work perfect
1993ka24det is offline  
Old 04-20-2015, 07:56 PM
  #703  
Junior Member
 
Justin case's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 60
Total Cats: 4
Default

Just wanted to say,the lift that Apollo is on is awesome. I've never seen adapters like that.
Justin case is offline  
Old 05-15-2015, 12:54 PM
  #704  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
dcamp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 818
Total Cats: 69
Default

Sorry if this has been posted before- I skimmed and didn't see it: Developing the Nissan GT-R LM NISMO

Pretty interesting advantages to running FWD



dcamp2 is offline  
Old 08-02-2015, 04:27 PM
  #705  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1993ka24det's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Posts: 638
Total Cats: 57
Default

I found this diffuser made from Factory 5 Racing's 818. I emailed them for the measurements, but now I can't find that email.

818 Carbon Fiber Rear Diffuser - Factory Five Parts Catalog









Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser2__03533.1383861469.1280.1280_zpsyvbsb2ze.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser1__33731.1383861469.1280.1280_zps86vqlrlb.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser3__81903.1383861469.1280.1280_zpspgqhwyc8.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818reardiffuserside__64532.1384784807.1280.1280_zpscnfr8tjw.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818reardiffuseroverhead__21625.1384784807.1280.1280_zpsuw40q9pu.jpg  

1993ka24det is offline  
Old 08-20-2015, 02:02 PM
  #706  
Junior Member
 
Oh4One4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: NE GA
Posts: 113
Total Cats: 17
Default

Hey, asking the brain trust on this. I'd like to know what this wing is as I'm not entirely sure. I'm pretty sure that I know what it is but I would like to be sure.

Just under 61" wide. Legs just under 47" apart. Difference in AOA from center to end about 16 degrees.




















Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3854_ccb63cbaae75a99f5d960dc55e4f0ca4427d5a14.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3855_0b73951add58e9b38488618f434d12288c4507ee.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3856_442f098db38425a08e7a22495e91cdae75fc7522.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3857_7b11b66e9ed6be418d7dac6892ca68b4c6f74935.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3858_bcbd613234d62bac051d78cc6b25ffe3f2cb0b9f.jpg  

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3859_28bcfdebfd1501e09ec61c3a9b93edf0784feb8b.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3860_2fceacc231163efcc96e50d82c88b0127750d870.jpg  
Oh4One4 is offline  
Old 08-20-2015, 11:25 PM
  #707  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
motormechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 187
Total Cats: 3
Default

looks like a replica APR GTC.
motormechanic is offline  
Old 08-21-2015, 06:53 PM
  #708  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

61" wide with 47" mount spacing matches GTC-300
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 08-30-2015, 06:53 PM
  #709  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1993ka24det's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Posts: 638
Total Cats: 57
Default

Spring load DRS

1993ka24det is offline  
Old 08-30-2015, 07:18 PM
  #710  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

<p>Could that be done with a trunk spoiler? Like the lexan type. Some really strong springs, so it is upright at low speeds and pushed out of the way at higher speeds? Or would that fail?</p>
aidandj is offline  
Old 08-30-2015, 10:54 PM
  #711  
Junior Member
 
ofspunk7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: North St Paul, MN
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 25
Default

Wow, no idea the science behind that. However, I love the idea of it. I hope someone with knowledge chimes in.
ofspunk7 is offline  
Old 08-31-2015, 12:15 PM
  #712  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

Not spring-loaded. According to SVA:

Originally Posted by SVA Imports
appearances can be deceptive, it is hydraulically operated & ecu controlled based upon speed, lateral G & braking , the video was of the wings first test before the actuation perimeters were tuned!
The reason nobody would assume that it is controlled by ECU/GPS based on the video is because the activation and deactivation timing is wayyyy off, but it's obviously a work in progress.
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 08-31-2015, 12:17 PM
  #713  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

<p>But would spring loaded work?</p>
aidandj is offline  
Old 08-31-2015, 12:55 PM
  #714  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

"Work" is a little broad but my $0.02:
For a DRS system you want a solid fixed position when ON and solid fixed position when OFF. Most springs are linear if you ignore the far extremes of their range, so a simple spring system would be passive (uncontrolled by driver or ecu - not good) and continuously variable as speeds changed (not good). I'm sure a complex spring system could be concocted that worked around that to some degree, but likely no less complicated than other systems, with no benefit (cost doesn't count - there are other low-budget options without these drawbacks, like Keith has done)..
__________________
Ryan Passey

Last edited by ThePass; 08-31-2015 at 04:15 PM.
ThePass is offline  
Old 08-31-2015, 01:12 PM
  #715  
Junior Member
 
ofspunk7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: North St Paul, MN
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by ThePass
The reason nobody would assume that it is controlled by ECU/GPS based on the video is because the activation and deactivation timing is wayyyy off, but it's obviously a work in progress.
That makes much more sense. I was watching the video and trying to make sense of how they set it up. The wing wasn't acting how I thought it should (in my limited knowledge of Aero). This makes more sense.


Originally Posted by ThePass
"Work" is a little broad but my $0.02:
For a DRS system you want a solid fixed position when ON and solid fixed position when OFF. Most springs are linear if you ignore the far extremes of their range, so a simple spring system would be passive (uncontrolled by driver or ecu - not good) and continuously variable as speeds changed (not good). I'm sure a complex spring system could be concocted that worked around that to some degree, but likely no less complicated than other systems, with no benefit (cost doesn't count - there are other low-budget options without these drawbacks, like Keith has done)..
Yeah, I am not an expert in this field at all. However, I was waiting for a good example of how this could actually work. Springs did seem like a weird source of resistance. It wasn't making any sense how springs could be functional and efficient. Thanks for the clarification.
ofspunk7 is offline  
Old 08-31-2015, 04:07 PM
  #716  
Newb
 
turbotoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4
Total Cats: 0
Default

Are any of you guys cutting away behind the front wheel to allow better pressure release?



Im sure Ryan will comment(I can see he has done some work on his to help)

Relieving the pressure there isnt just about reducing lift, while thats one of the reasons its not the primary.

Wheels and tyres make really good vacuum cleaners, in which they suck all the air into the wheelarches, but then if it has nowhere easy to go, the pressure increases and creates lift, you can vent from the top of the arch and also the rear part of the arch.

One of the important things about venting arches is to keep the pressure as close to ambient as possible.

Your splitter works by forcing the air that travels underneath it to speed up and as such becomes a low pressure area.........now if you have low pressure heading straight into a high pressure area, thats exactly what it doesnt want to do.

Imagine opening a bottle of fizzy pop, the air always wants to go from high pressure to low pressure

The only way you can force it is with lots of velocity, but effectively its still like hitting a brick wall.

If you can reduce that wheelarch pressure you reduce the 'wall' and the splitter allows more air to pass out of it and hence works better.

This is also why I suggest front diffusers to allow that pressure gradient to be more gradual to reduce the 'wall' scenario.

So your now making more front downforce, you can then add more to the rear to balance the car for a net increase in overall downforce more than just a little reduction in lift in the wheel arch.

Its not as easy on a miata to remove as much as I have but it will be possible with some chopping and welding, a very good example of this would be Under Suzuki

This is what i did with my car, I know its not a miata, but one of the guys on here has said it would help if i joined in with my thoughts
turbotoaster is offline  
Old 04-16-2016, 06:36 PM
  #717  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1993ka24det's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Posts: 638
Total Cats: 57
Default

So this is what I found a couple of days ago





1993ka24det is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 01:23 AM
  #718  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Originally Posted by Oh4One4
Just under 61" wide. Legs just under 47" apart. Difference in AOA from center to end about 16 degrees.


To me it looks like its just over 60"
Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-147538_aerodynamic_discussion_thread_80_cimg3856_442f098db38425a08e7a22495e91cdae75fc7522_2d6.jpg  
triple88a is offline  
Old 07-12-2016, 01:18 AM
  #719  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

COT wing spotted on Pikes Peak.

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-larry_chen_speedhunters_pikes_peak_2016-2.jpg
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 08-15-2016, 09:21 PM
  #720  
Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rlogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 733
Total Cats: 17
Default

He was one of the first guys to start using the COT wings. I ran across his build thread back before I started the big COT wing thread on here.

On another note, I have also been watching those videos for the F1000 composites on youtube...there is some great tech in there, specifically the materials etc.

Originally Posted by ThePass
COT wing spotted on Pikes Peak.

Attachment 176408
rlogan is offline  


Quick Reply: Aerodynamic Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.