Notices
Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2015 | 04:54 PM
  #701  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

Definitely an Apollo. That splitter looks a lot like mine.

-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Apr 20, 2015 | 06:41 PM
  #702  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Originally Posted by humming
What car is that? looks like a gumpert apollo maybe?

It is a Gumper Apollo


Originally Posted by Der_Idiot
Is that a picture of the front end? Looks like it has a splitter followed by a recess to allow in air between the flat tray and the car? Could that feed air through the transmission tunnel and out the back by the diffuser?
And you are also right. For my setup it will work perfect
Old Apr 20, 2015 | 07:56 PM
  #703  
Justin case's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 60
Total Cats: 4
Default

Just wanted to say,the lift that Apollo is on is awesome. I've never seen adapters like that.
Old May 15, 2015 | 12:54 PM
  #704  
dcamp2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 818
Total Cats: 69
From: Colorado
Default

Sorry if this has been posted before- I skimmed and didn't see it: Developing the Nissan GT-R LM NISMO

Pretty interesting advantages to running FWD



Old Aug 2, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #705  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

I found this diffuser made from Factory 5 Racing's 818. I emailed them for the measurements, but now I can't find that email.

818 Carbon Fiber Rear Diffuser - Factory Five Parts Catalog









Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser2__03533.1383861469.1280.1280_zpsyvbsb2ze.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser1__33731.1383861469.1280.1280_zps86vqlrlb.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818_rear_diffuser3__81903.1383861469.1280.1280_zpspgqhwyc8.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818reardiffuserside__64532.1384784807.1280.1280_zpscnfr8tjw.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-818reardiffuseroverhead__21625.1384784807.1280.1280_zpsuw40q9pu.jpg  

Old Aug 20, 2015 | 02:02 PM
  #706  
Oh4One4's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 124
Total Cats: 19
From: NE GA
Default

Hey, asking the brain trust on this. I'd like to know what this wing is as I'm not entirely sure. I'm pretty sure that I know what it is but I would like to be sure.

Just under 61" wide. Legs just under 47" apart. Difference in AOA from center to end about 16 degrees.




















Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3854_ccb63cbaae75a99f5d960dc55e4f0ca4427d5a14.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3855_0b73951add58e9b38488618f434d12288c4507ee.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3856_442f098db38425a08e7a22495e91cdae75fc7522.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3857_7b11b66e9ed6be418d7dac6892ca68b4c6f74935.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3858_bcbd613234d62bac051d78cc6b25ffe3f2cb0b9f.jpg  

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3859_28bcfdebfd1501e09ec61c3a9b93edf0784feb8b.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-cimg3860_2fceacc231163efcc96e50d82c88b0127750d870.jpg  
Old Aug 20, 2015 | 11:25 PM
  #707  
motormechanic's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 187
Total Cats: 3
Default

looks like a replica APR GTC.
Old Aug 21, 2015 | 06:53 PM
  #708  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

61" wide with 47" mount spacing matches GTC-300
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 06:53 PM
  #709  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Spring load DRS

Old Aug 30, 2015 | 07:18 PM
  #710  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

<p>Could that be done with a trunk spoiler? Like the lexan type. Some really strong springs, so it is upright at low speeds and pushed out of the way at higher speeds? Or would that fail?</p>
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 10:54 PM
  #711  
ofspunk7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 25
From: North St Paul, MN
Default

Wow, no idea the science behind that. However, I love the idea of it. I hope someone with knowledge chimes in.
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 12:15 PM
  #712  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

Not spring-loaded. According to SVA:

Originally Posted by SVA Imports
appearances can be deceptive, it is hydraulically operated & ecu controlled based upon speed, lateral G & braking , the video was of the wings first test before the actuation perimeters were tuned!
The reason nobody would assume that it is controlled by ECU/GPS based on the video is because the activation and deactivation timing is wayyyy off, but it's obviously a work in progress.
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 12:17 PM
  #713  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

<p>But would spring loaded work?</p>
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 12:55 PM
  #714  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

"Work" is a little broad but my $0.02:
For a DRS system you want a solid fixed position when ON and solid fixed position when OFF. Most springs are linear if you ignore the far extremes of their range, so a simple spring system would be passive (uncontrolled by driver or ecu - not good) and continuously variable as speeds changed (not good). I'm sure a complex spring system could be concocted that worked around that to some degree, but likely no less complicated than other systems, with no benefit (cost doesn't count - there are other low-budget options without these drawbacks, like Keith has done)..
__________________
Ryan Passey

Last edited by ThePass; Aug 31, 2015 at 04:15 PM.
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 01:12 PM
  #715  
ofspunk7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 25
From: North St Paul, MN
Default

Originally Posted by ThePass
The reason nobody would assume that it is controlled by ECU/GPS based on the video is because the activation and deactivation timing is wayyyy off, but it's obviously a work in progress.
That makes much more sense. I was watching the video and trying to make sense of how they set it up. The wing wasn't acting how I thought it should (in my limited knowledge of Aero). This makes more sense.


Originally Posted by ThePass
"Work" is a little broad but my $0.02:
For a DRS system you want a solid fixed position when ON and solid fixed position when OFF. Most springs are linear if you ignore the far extremes of their range, so a simple spring system would be passive (uncontrolled by driver or ecu - not good) and continuously variable as speeds changed (not good). I'm sure a complex spring system could be concocted that worked around that to some degree, but likely no less complicated than other systems, with no benefit (cost doesn't count - there are other low-budget options without these drawbacks, like Keith has done)..
Yeah, I am not an expert in this field at all. However, I was waiting for a good example of how this could actually work. Springs did seem like a weird source of resistance. It wasn't making any sense how springs could be functional and efficient. Thanks for the clarification.
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 04:07 PM
  #716  
turbotoaster's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4
Total Cats: 0
Default

Are any of you guys cutting away behind the front wheel to allow better pressure release?



Im sure Ryan will comment(I can see he has done some work on his to help)

Relieving the pressure there isnt just about reducing lift, while thats one of the reasons its not the primary.

Wheels and tyres make really good vacuum cleaners, in which they suck all the air into the wheelarches, but then if it has nowhere easy to go, the pressure increases and creates lift, you can vent from the top of the arch and also the rear part of the arch.

One of the important things about venting arches is to keep the pressure as close to ambient as possible.

Your splitter works by forcing the air that travels underneath it to speed up and as such becomes a low pressure area.........now if you have low pressure heading straight into a high pressure area, thats exactly what it doesnt want to do.

Imagine opening a bottle of fizzy pop, the air always wants to go from high pressure to low pressure

The only way you can force it is with lots of velocity, but effectively its still like hitting a brick wall.

If you can reduce that wheelarch pressure you reduce the 'wall' and the splitter allows more air to pass out of it and hence works better.

This is also why I suggest front diffusers to allow that pressure gradient to be more gradual to reduce the 'wall' scenario.

So your now making more front downforce, you can then add more to the rear to balance the car for a net increase in overall downforce more than just a little reduction in lift in the wheel arch.

Its not as easy on a miata to remove as much as I have but it will be possible with some chopping and welding, a very good example of this would be Under Suzuki

This is what i did with my car, I know its not a miata, but one of the guys on here has said it would help if i joined in with my thoughts
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 06:36 PM
  #717  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

So this is what I found a couple of days ago





Old Apr 18, 2016 | 01:23 AM
  #718  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Oh4One4
Just under 61" wide. Legs just under 47" apart. Difference in AOA from center to end about 16 degrees.


To me it looks like its just over 60"
Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-80-147538_aerodynamic_discussion_thread_80_cimg3856_442f098db38425a08e7a22495e91cdae75fc7522_2d6.jpg  
Old Jul 12, 2016 | 01:18 AM
  #719  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

COT wing spotted on Pikes Peak.

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-larry_chen_speedhunters_pikes_peak_2016-2.jpg
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 09:21 PM
  #720  
rlogan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 733
Total Cats: 17
From: San Antonio
Default

He was one of the first guys to start using the COT wings. I ran across his build thread back before I started the big COT wing thread on here.

On another note, I have also been watching those videos for the F1000 composites on youtube...there is some great tech in there, specifically the materials etc.

Originally Posted by ThePass
COT wing spotted on Pikes Peak.

Attachment 176408



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.