Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New FP miata

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2013, 12:27 PM
  #101  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Question for your custom bellhousing setup...

Do you think that you could run a stock Miata flywheel/pressure plate with a special disc and use the Miata stock release arm (maybe even the release bearing)?

Im thinking about a tex racing dog engagement transmission because Im thinking of blowing my budget out of the water and this would be one of my "to do" things.
shlammed is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:02 AM
  #102  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hingstonwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 904
Total Cats: 14
Default

When I cut my bell housing, the pivot stud was lost, though I do think you might be able to mount a pivot point to the adapter plate that is welded to bell housing.
hingstonwm is offline  
Old 11-18-2013, 03:52 PM
  #103  
Newb
 
Lennox60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thanks for posting the pics of the cut on the A pillar - made the cuts last night - it's starting to look more racey...

I am trying to figure out the cage design. Do you have any detailed pictures of your new cage?
Lennox60 is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 09:41 AM
  #104  
Junior Member
 
Team DNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 87
Total Cats: 0
Default

Hey Bill,

Just stumbled across this thread. Been away from Miata Turbo forum for a while - never dawned on me that there would be such an extensive thread on an FP Miata.

I have a slightly converted SM (still has top) and a fresh tub on a rotisserie - so we are a long way off from your FP. Car ran as FP back in 05, but Regional Races (SARRC) only here in the SE. Finally getting back to working on my car. Will be asking bookoo questions if you don't mind.

First one echos Lennox60. My tub has no cage at this time. I noticed you went from a half width to full width main hoop. Was this done to reduce the number of bars stuck out in the wind?

Thanks for the detailed posts you've put up!

Henry

Last edited by Team DNR; 11-27-2013 at 09:12 AM.
Team DNR is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 10:09 AM
  #105  
Junior Member
 
Team DNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 87
Total Cats: 0
Default

delete

Last edited by Team DNR; 11-21-2013 at 10:12 AM. Reason: duplicate response
Team DNR is offline  
Old 11-22-2013, 01:25 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hingstonwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 904
Total Cats: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Lennox60
Thanks for posting the pics of the cut on the A pillar - made the cuts last night - it's starting to look more racey...

I am trying to figure out the cage design. Do you have any detailed pictures of your new cage?
Originally Posted by Team DNR
Hey Bill,

Just stumbled across this thread. Been away from Miata Turbo forum for a while - never dawned on me that there would be such an extensive thread on an FP Miata.

I have a slightly converted SM (still has top) and a fresh tub on a rotisserie - so we are a long way off from your FP. Car ran as FP back in 05, but Regional classes only here in the SE. Finally getting back to working on my car. Will be asking bookoo questions if you don't mind.

First one echos Lennox60. My tub has no cage at this time. I noticed you went from a half width to full width main hoop. Was this done to reduce the number of bars stuck out in the wind?

Thanks for the detailed posts you've put up!

Henry
Guys bear with me until the weekend is over, I work all weekend; overnights, I will get some pics of the cage posted up on Monday. Ask away on the questions,I will help you out as much as I can. There is a ton of knowledge on this forum, and quite a few guys that understand how to make a miata handle. I'm sure most would be willing to help a fellow racer out with advice.

As for the cage, yes it was converted to a full width design to minimize surface area and drag.
hingstonwm is offline  
Old 11-26-2013, 02:09 PM
  #107  
Newb
 
Lennox60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 0
Default

Awesome, thanks!
Lennox60 is offline  
Old 12-06-2013, 11:13 AM
  #108  
Junior Member
 
Team DNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 87
Total Cats: 0
Default

Hey Bill,

On another thread I was asking about the engine in your car, but I don't know if you saw that one. Are you running hydraulic lifters or solids?
Team DNR is offline  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:30 AM
  #109  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hingstonwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 904
Total Cats: 14
Default

Running hydraulic, latest generation Jesse Prather Motorsports cams, also running a stepped header with a very nice 4-2-1 collector. No problems turning the engine to 8k.
hingstonwm is offline  
Old 12-08-2013, 05:33 PM
  #110  
Junior Member
 
Team DNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 87
Total Cats: 0
Default

Mr. Bill
thanks for that cam info.

Another question if you please. Are you still running the Stinger ecu the car came with? I'd previously read the whole thread and I thought you had changed to a Haltech along the way. I can't find that specific reference to verify what you've got at the moment.

I've been dicking around with an MS3 and can't seem to get it to work. Back in 05 I ran an AEM that worked well but we've been using MS 1 & 2 products in our shop with good results. I wanted to try the MS3 on the Prod car, but my total lack of progress may force me to have to just bite the bullet and switch my shock/suspension money into a commercial ecu. Do you know anyone in the Prod community that may be running a MS3?
Team DNR is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:29 AM
  #111  
Newb
 
Lennox60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Total Cats: 0
Default

Hi Bill -are you going to get a chance to post some pics of your cage and interior?

Thanks,
Len
Lennox60 is offline  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:40 PM
  #112  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hingstonwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 904
Total Cats: 14
Default

Sorry I have not been on for a while, got the pics just need to upload them. As for ecm, I run a electromotive tec gt, it has been flawless. Jesse did the tune, very drivable on track, but the car does have a hard time at idle, not surprising with big over lap cams and light flywheel.
hingstonwm is offline  
Old 12-29-2013, 12:01 PM
  #113  
Newb
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Total Cats: -100
Default

Hi Bill, glad your having fun with my old FP car. Here is my new toy. Because of Mazdas great support it had to be a Mazda.
Chris
Attached Thumbnails New FP miata-006.jpg  
mchris is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:16 AM
  #114  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hingstonwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 904
Total Cats: 14
Default

Chris, The car looks great!! Im sure it is going to be a hoot to drive. Looks like a tub car not tube frame, will that hurt you in gt3 ?
hingstonwm is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 09:04 AM
  #115  
Newb
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Total Cats: -100
Default

Nope, its a tube frame. And I have to add lots of lead as it weighs only 1680lbs. With the 2.3 MZR engine it makes lots of HP also. Its a Riley Grand AM chassis copy so its really torsionally stiff. I'll have no excuse if I don't win races with this one. And for those that are not diehard Mazda fans thats the 787B Lemans winning paint scheme.
Attached Thumbnails New FP miata-002.jpg  
mchris is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 10:17 AM
  #116  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by mchris
Nope, its a tube frame. And I have to add lots of lead as it weighs only 1680lbs. With the 2.3 MZR engine it makes lots of HP also. Its a Riley Grand AM chassis copy so its really torsionally stiff. I'll have no excuse if I don't win races with this one. And for those that are not diehard Mazda fans thats the 787B Lemans winning paint scheme.
Wow thats a dinky restrictor after the air filter. Is the restrictor config mandated in the rules or just the diameter? There's some gains to be found over that configuration.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:02 AM
  #117  
Newb
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Total Cats: -100
Default

The restrictor is called an SIR and caps the HP to around 280. Its 31mm. I was supprised in my first use of one to find they work pretty well. I had one on my old GT2 car that was 37mm and the car put down a stout 320 WHP. Whats suprising about that is that it had the non SIR cams in it that run much more overlap and still made good power. If you look at most Grand Am cars, the open cockpit cars will have them placed just over the drivers head.
mchris is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:08 AM
  #118  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by mchris
The restrictor is called an SIR and caps the HP to around 280. Its 31mm. I was supprised in my first use of one to find they work pretty well. I had one on my old GT2 car that was 37mm and the car put down a stout 320 WHP. Whats suprising about that is that it had the non SIR cams in it that run much more overlap and still made good power. If you look at most Grand Am cars, the open cockpit cars will have them placed just over the drivers head.
I understand that. But with good use of geometry you can flow more air through the restrictor than you can a simple restrictor. There could be significant funkyness going on inside the filter and the shinny tube that I'm not seeing though.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:20 AM
  #119  
Newb
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Total Cats: -100
Default

With an SIR there are bell mouths at both ends that you do not see. And contrary to what you think might make sense, the small diameter is at the entrance and it tapers to some larger size slowly till the exit bellmouth to eliminate any turbulence. I was going to install it backwards at first the first time I installed one. Fluid dynamics is not my strong suit.
Chris
mchris is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 11:21 AM
  #120  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by mchris
With an SIR there are bell mouths at both ends that you do not see. And contrary to what you think might make sense, the small diameter is at the entrance and it tapers to some larger size slowly till the exit bellmouth to eliminate any turbulence. I was going to install it backwards at first the first time I installed one. Fluid dynamics is not my strong suit.
Chris
Yup, more aggressive taper in, softer taper out. I would have figured bellmouth on the inlet, but no bellmouth on the exit, just take the taper all the way to the diameter of the tube.
Leafy is offline  


Quick Reply: New FP miata



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.