Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Post your DIY aero pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2012, 08:33 PM
  #101  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,224
Total Cats: 1,146
Default

Its for heat evacuation. Heat's shoved in the front, through your awesome ducting, through your awesome radiator, then it sits in the engine bay, eventually finding it's way past the engine, below the firewall, and out past the transmission and exhaust somewhere.

The extraction vents are hopefully placed in a lower pressure zone of the hood, meaning the aero over the vents "suck" the heat out directly after it's past through the radiator.

That's a layman's explanation anyways, bottom line is it works.
curly is offline  
Old 05-25-2012, 08:58 PM
  #102  
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
mikaelhgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Its for heat evacuation. Heat's shoved in the front, through your awesome ducting, through your awesome radiator, then it sits in the engine bay, eventually finding it's way past the engine, below the firewall, and out past the transmission and exhaust somewhere.

The extraction vents are hopefully placed in a lower pressure zone of the hood, meaning the aero over the vents "suck" the heat out directly after it's past through the radiator.

That's a layman's explanation anyways, bottom line is it works.

(The extraction vents are hopefully placed in a lower pressure zone of the hood) when i first saw them thats what I thought there's no way to know if where they are located will help heat/ air expulsion, there is, was a guy on here that put on, what to me looked like the most useful vents ive ever seen
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1328449248
mikaelhgn is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 04:41 AM
  #103  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Just for kicks, the homemade aero of a frieds. It's "a bit understeered" at the moment

Attached Thumbnails Post your DIY aero pics-h_pihl_side-view.jpg   Post your DIY aero pics-h_pihl_flat_floor.jpg  
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 09:21 AM
  #104  
573
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Troy, Michigan
Posts: 252
Total Cats: 17
Default

What's the point of putting the wing so far back? I understand the whole clean air thing, but wouldn't placing the wing that far back cause the rear wheels to act like a fulcrum and lighten the front?
573 is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 03:20 PM
  #105  
Junior Member
 
Handy Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by 573
What's the point of putting the wing so far back? I understand the whole clean air thing, but wouldn't placing the wing that far back cause the rear wheels to act like a fulcrum and lighten the front?
Yes, it will lighten the front, but it also can work synergistically with the diffuser and reduce drag. Of course its impossible to know if its actually doing so without good testing.

TBH I'm surprised the whatever sanctioning body he's under allows it to be so far back. Most require a wing not extend rearward past the body.
Handy Man is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 03:27 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mr_hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 798
Total Cats: 24
Default

He did say it was a bit 'understeered'. If you level the wing out, you could probably get the proper downforce with less drag than a wing mounted over the wheels with a stronger AOT. Does that pass the physics 101 sniff test?
mr_hyde is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 04:25 PM
  #107  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
9671111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,582
Total Cats: 18
Default

*

Last edited by 9671111; 02-28-2020 at 12:36 AM.
9671111 is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 04:57 PM
  #108  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
motormechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 187
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 573
What's the point of putting the wing so far back? I understand the whole clean air thing, but wouldn't placing the wing that far back cause the rear wheels to act like a fulcrum and lighten the front?
The wing has a low pressure region underneath it that works strongly on the airflow behind the car.
motormechanic is offline  
Old 05-26-2012, 06:29 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by rccote
what's being done about exhaust, diff, and trans heat?
Notice the gap between the diffusor and bumper. There is an airflow above the floor/diffusor.

But it has not been run for that long, so we'll see what brakes first.
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 02:31 AM
  #110  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
9671111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,582
Total Cats: 18
Default

*

Last edited by 9671111; 02-28-2020 at 12:36 AM.
9671111 is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 03:32 AM
  #111  
Senior Member
 
mx5-kiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 992
Total Cats: 57
Default

Has anyone ever quantified all this extra aero with lap times, seat of the pants feel..eg: I can now take so and so corner with 300 more revs/ a higher gear, I can brake 30 m later than I used to previously..... etc...

All this aero fascinates and tempts me but it's hard to know to go to the extra effort, cost and drama if it is only for minimal gains....
mx5-kiwi is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 04:01 AM
  #112  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,458
Total Cats: 1,803
Default

Also the wing will provide more leverage that far back. Force x distance = more momentum around the point. Meaning it will "twist" the car more therefore providing more force against the rear tires.
triple88a is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 05:17 AM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: melbourne aus
Posts: 515
Total Cats: 92
Default

Having a wing that far back is more effective - meaning you can use a smaller less downforce/drag wing.

I plan on mounting mine far back too.
lightyear is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 07:49 AM
  #114  
Junior Member
 
damir130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 139
Total Cats: 6
Default

What do you do about the ~50% of upforce at the front tires that you get as a result of the rear mount? Is front downforce available at such low l/d ratios that you don't have to care about adding another 50%?
damir130 is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 08:32 AM
  #115  
Junior Member
 
Handy Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by mx5-kiwi
Has anyone ever quantified all this extra aero with lap times, seat of the pants feel..eg: I can now take so and so corner with 300 more revs/ a higher gear, I can brake 30 m later than I used to previously..... etc...

All this aero fascinates and tempts me but it's hard to know to go to the extra effort, cost and drama if it is only for minimal gains....
Not the most technical, but my experience:

No aero: Car is balanced
Just a splitter: over 50mph the car oversteers like crazy
Splitter and wing: car is balanced again
Handy Man is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 03:31 PM
  #116  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by mr_hyde
He did say it was a bit 'understeered'.
Reduced attack angle the frist time did not help, but lowering the car half an inch made wonders and balance became decent.
Aero opens a new dimension of options, and possibilities to screw up
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 05:49 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: melbourne aus
Posts: 515
Total Cats: 92
Default

Dual element wings like the one on that car are for high downforce, and should be used on low speed tracks. He could try removing the second element/top wing part. I think aero is something you have to balance out. So get as much on the front, then adjust the rear to suit.
lightyear is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 10:55 PM
  #118  
Junior Member
 
DOHCPanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 145
Total Cats: -1
Default

The only aero mod I have done is purchase my hard top a few months back. My inspiration come from this. I so want to build those sail panels for my hard top. Also the electric fans pulling air from under the car, and the hood, and, and, and, ---- it I really just want that car.
Attached Thumbnails Post your DIY aero pics-2ferrari-599xx.jpg  
DOHCPanther is offline  
Old 05-28-2012, 02:54 AM
  #119  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by lightyear
Dual element wings like the one on that car are for high downforce, and should be used on low speed tracks. He could try removing the second element/top wing part. I think aero is something you have to balance out. So get as much on the front, then adjust the rear to suit.
Before lowing the car he tried to remove the top element and lowering the attack angle to negative (but still low grip at the front).
Lowering made the front work much better so the initial wing setup made it balanced (cut 2 secs on a one minute track right away).
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 05-28-2012, 05:19 PM
  #120  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,458
Total Cats: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by DOHCPanther
The only aero mod I have done is purchase my hard top a few months back. My inspiration come from this. I so want to build those sail panels for my hard top. Also the electric fans pulling air from under the car, and the hood, and, and, and, ---- it I really just want that car.
Why not just buy a sucker car?
triple88a is offline  


Quick Reply: Post your DIY aero pics



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.