Notices
Bellengineering - Miata Accessories Ordering and General Information Stephanie Turner 830-438-2890 ext. 103 stepht@bellengineering.net

BEGi does it in the rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
wes65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,369
Total Cats: -1
From: Southern Indiana
Default BEGi does it in the rear?

So, Corky decided he wanted to take a stab at rear mount on a 2006 mx5. Interesting. Here are the results. (sorry if this is a repost, i didnt see another one)

http://www.bellengineering.net/Pages/intheshop.html
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #2  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Good god... say it isn't so.
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #3  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Why not try it if you have the resources? The article does say that the production kit will be under the hood though.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #4  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

i would hope so. i can't see the intercooler being behind the turbo as a good thing for cooling the charge air. unless you drive backward over bridges in the rain....
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
The article does say that the production kit will be under the hood though.
I think thats the only thing that kept me from shitting a brick.
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #6  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

I dont understand. If they plan to put it under the hood why experiment with it in the back? Just for ***** and giggles? No ones gonna buy a rear mount, seems like a waste of resources.

I wonder whos soup pot they cannibalized for the turbos heatshield.
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #7  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

It actually looks like the easiest approach to get the thing boosted while you worked on the electronics to manage it. Get the computer up and running, then get the thing to fit under the hood.
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

If you followed the thread on m.net Corky absolutely did not want to produce a kit that was "offroad" only. I believe one of his employees just went at it, and now they are going to refine the system.

I had a strong suspicion it was going to be a rear mount for the longest while. Before the -S kit was released actually, which I thought was going to be the announcement of this kit.
Old May 18, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #9  
bripab007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,450
Total Cats: -1
Default

Yuck.
Old May 18, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I wonder if Kurt Rohmer was on retainer for technical advice...
Old May 18, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #11  
AbeFM's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Why the hating on the rear mounts anyway? The only thing I'd realy worry about is cooling of the intake charge on the way down the pipe. The IC in the back of the turbo DOES look pretty suspect to me, in fact, why bother with an intercooler at all with so much piping? Even a tiny water/air IC at the front would get out that last three joules of heat but with 10 feet of piping you can't possibly care. And it would look really stock if you make any effort to do so.

Plus, you could cook stew in your trunk, or really any crockpot dish.
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #12  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
I wonder if Kurt Rohmer was on retainer for technical advice...
no, but he almost passed a stone when he saw the pics.
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #13  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
I wonder if Kurt Rohmer was on retainer for technical advice...
I doubt it,I don't see chicken wire,zip ties and chewing gum holding the turbo & intercoooler on.
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #14  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by AbeFM
Why the hating on the rear mounts anyway? The only thing I'd realy worry about is cooling of the intake charge on the way down the pipe. The IC in the back of the turbo DOES look pretty suspect to me, in fact, why bother with an intercooler at all with so much piping? Even a tiny water/air IC at the front would get out that last three joules of heat but with 10 feet of piping you can't possibly care. And it would look really stock if you make any effort to do so.

betcha the final product will have a front mount and a better exhaust setup.
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #15  
Pitlab77's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,914
Total Cats: 5
From: Houston
Default

WTF cares about the NC, I'm more interested in the 99 timing and fuel solution
Old May 18, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #16  
cueball1's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
From: Tigard, Oregon
Default

If you've got the parts and the time why not try? A couple of years ago Megasquirt would have seemed ridiculous to try. Home built ECU - are you kidding me?

If people didn't try new ways to do things we would still be riding horses and all **** would be in the missionary position.
Old May 18, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #17  
wes65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,369
Total Cats: -1
From: Southern Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by cueball1

If people didn't try new ways to do things .... all **** would be in the missionary position.
Old May 18, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #18  
Milton Tucker's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 446
Total Cats: 1
From: Western N.C.
Default

Originally Posted by paul
i would hope so. i can't see the intercooler being behind the turbo as a good thing for cooling the charge air. unless you drive backward over bridges in the rain....
Just needs a cooling fan, and an extractor trunk.
Old May 19, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #19  
AbeFM's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Pitlab77
WTF cares about the NC, I'm more interested in the 99 timing and fuel solution
MegaSquirt stand alone? Seems to work well. Plus the OEM ecu makes an okay emergency frisbee in case you get tired of driving your car and want to do something else fun.
Old May 19, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #20  
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -100
From: Bell Tuning & Performance
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
I dont understand. If they plan to put it under the hood why experiment with it in the back? Just for ***** and giggles? No ones gonna buy a rear mount, seems like a waste of resources.

I wonder whos soup pot they cannibalized for the turbos heatshield.
A small effort to keep it CARB legal. Can't mess with the CATs if you want to be legal..
Stephanie



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.