Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap
#9043
You're going to measure by using some arbitrary thickness but relatively thin shim as a nominal reference, & measure gaps with a feeler, right? I did the same, and a simple excel sheet saved me a ton of time. Make the 1st row for imputing the measured gap. make the 2nd row something like: = your reference shim thickness + (measured gap - desired gap). This should spit out the exact shim thickness you need for that valve as long as none of them need to be thinner than your reference. Better than back 'o napkin math...
also I made the mistake of measuring for shims before I lapped in valves, and it made enough of a difference to matter. My used head was pretty nasty though, so YMMV.
also I made the mistake of measuring for shims before I lapped in valves, and it made enough of a difference to matter. My used head was pretty nasty though, so YMMV.
#9046
... before... That's the first I've heard of it changing values. I just torqued down the cam caps when I did my measurements. If the values were changing significantly after torqueing down the head, wouldn't that imply that the whole head is flexing significantly when it's torqued to the block? That seems like it would be a design problem beyond just lifter clearance, but I'm just armchairing here.
#9047
... before... That's the first I've heard of it changing values. I just torqued down the cam caps when I did my measurements. If the values were changing significantly after torqueing down the head, wouldn't that imply that the whole head is flexing significantly when it's torqued to the block? That seems like it would be a design problem beyond just lifter clearance, but I'm just armchairing here.
#9049
Can't say 100% as I'm still waiting on the stupid little dowels...
I did my valve lash because the shop was taking forever but he didn't mention anything about torquing the head down on the block when checking it. All I had the shop do was clean + recut seats + springs + retainers + seals. He was bitching about having to check/set lash so I paid for work to that point and measured & bought shims.
Hopefully, it'll get put back on the block this weekend. If the dowels show up...
I did my valve lash because the shop was taking forever but he didn't mention anything about torquing the head down on the block when checking it. All I had the shop do was clean + recut seats + springs + retainers + seals. He was bitching about having to check/set lash so I paid for work to that point and measured & bought shims.
Hopefully, it'll get put back on the block this weekend. If the dowels show up...
#9050
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,100
Not sure I buy this. Torque plates are used because the bores can twist a little, maybe up to .001" or so, and you want to correct for that. That is a large void across a large distance. The head has a lot more support structure, and you're talking about a much smaller distance the deflection is being measured across, and there is a range of acceptable which is 2-4x that of the range of acceptable bore sizes. IOW, there's no way the clearances change enough to matter.
#9053
When you go to reassemble the head, I learned a good trick for getting your valve keepers back in: position the keepers with the spring uncompressed, slip a Ziploc bag over the top of the keepers, then compress the spring. The bag gets pinned by the spring compressor, and the tension of the plastic on the keepers nudges them right into place. you can get them to seat in about 5 seconds. Totally awesome hack.
#9054
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Head is assembled. I have lots of pictures. Also started on the block. Can someone confirm these shims for me? Or suggest improvements? I'll place the order in the morning if I can find all of them.
I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
#9055
Looks plausible to me. The spreadsheet I used is here:
http://www.codrus.com/miata/fm2r/valves-2014-2.xlsx
It's essentially the same, although I put more of the intermediate numbers on there and I only did intake (machine shop had done exhaust when they cleaned up the head).
--Ian
http://www.codrus.com/miata/fm2r/valves-2014-2.xlsx
It's essentially the same, although I put more of the intermediate numbers on there and I only did intake (machine shop had done exhaust when they cleaned up the head).
--Ian
#9057
Head is assembled. I have lots of pictures. Also started on the block. Can someone confirm these shims for me? Or suggest improvements? I'll place the order in the morning if I can find all of them.
I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
I realize you want to get it done...
#9060
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
I'm going to assume high performance racing means like actual high performance racing. Not BP things.
So my bore is 3.3084".
Top ring: .0165 ≈ .017"
2nd ring: .0182 ≈ 0.19" (rounding up because bigger is better?)
Oil rail: .0496???
Should the oil rail gap be that much bigger than the ring gap?