Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Boost addicts 90 na, 2002 vvti engine, t04e twin scroll turbo, fully custom build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:01 AM
  #61  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

It appears you paired 1&3 and 2&4, that correct?



I'm going to let that soak in...
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:37 AM
  #62  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,634
Total Cats: 431
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

I was excited about this and was just going to watch, then it started going downhill.

Then I realized you're only going to use one wastegate, was really hoping for a proper twin scroll system but whatever.

Then on your last post I see you built the manifold completely wrong and you paired the incorrect cylinders, and that's where I stopped reading...
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:42 AM
  #63  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

[ scrollscroll | scrollscroll ]
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:47 AM
  #64  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

obvious answer is obvious. Custom crank and cams.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:56 AM
  #65  
Erat's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,718
Total Cats: 830
From: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Default

oh boy
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:56 AM
  #66  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I was so excited....now I'm sad
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 08:59 AM
  #67  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
should have read more miataturbo.net before you boosted.
This NOW applies!

Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:02 AM
  #68  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Now I kind of want to see him finish this. I wonder how it will perform. Dont think it's been done this way before. Bets on if it's worse or equal to single scroll?
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:04 AM
  #69  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

The only way to know would be to build the same exact manifold with a 4-1 merge and the same turbine A/R but in a single scroll on the same turbo, which won't happen. This turbo will spin, it will make boost: he will win because X.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:08 AM
  #70  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
The only way to know would be to build the same exact manifold with a 4-1 merge and the same turbine A/R but in a single scroll on the same turbo, which won't happen. This turbo will spin, it will make boost: he will win because X.
Couldnt you take this manifold. And grind out the divider?
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:09 AM
  #71  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Yeah, duh. Or just a single scroll turbine housing with the same flange.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:11 AM
  #72  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

even more duh.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:18 AM
  #73  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

I know nothing about twin scroll. Once again MT.net learns me. My education is ongoing.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:23 AM
  #74  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by ryansmoneypit
I know nothing about twin scroll. Once again MT.net learns me. My education is ongoing.
The point of it is to separate exhaust pulses. So they don't run into each other/into other open exhaust valves. So you want 1&4 paired and 2&3 paired. Firing order is 1-3-4-2. So it fires into opposite scrolls each ignition event.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:32 AM
  #75  
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 458
From: A cave in Va
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
The point of it is to separate exhaust pulses. So they don't run into each other/into other open exhaust valves. So you want 1&4 paired and 2&3 paired. Firing order is 1-3-4-2. So it fires into opposite scrolls each ignition event.
Makes total sense. I guess if I thought about it for ten three minutes, I would have drawn a similar conclusion. Isn't this like, exactly the same as a 4-2-1 header? Keeping gas pulses moving foreward and pulling the next one behind.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:55 AM
  #76  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

1-4 and 2-3 should be tied together.

Will this need a brace? I don't remember but you said you where doing a stepped runner, is that just where the two converge to one per port on the flange?

Edit: had the respond window open too long. My post is now irrelevant
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:02 AM
  #77  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

I know nothing about manifold design... but I do remember something about 4-2-1 headers. Is there any substantial performance disadvantage to merging the 1&4, 2&3 BEFORE the turbo flange? Is the flow path too short at this point to make merging practical? I would imagine that it might make packaging easier. Am I mistaken?
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:07 AM
  #78  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,634
Total Cats: 431
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
I know nothing about manifold design... but I do remember something about 4-2-1 headers. Is there any substantial performance disadvantage to merging the 1&4, 2&3 BEFORE the turbo flange? Is the flow path too short at this point to make merging practical? I would imagine that it might make packaging easier. Am I mistaken?

Yes you're mistaken. You have it backwards, there is a performance advantage when pairing 1/4 and 2/3 before the turbine housing, not a disadvantage. And yes it matters, it's the entire basis of how twin scroll works.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:09 AM
  #79  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by Arca_ex
Yes you're mistaken. You have it backwards, there is a performance advantage when pairing 1/4 and 2/3 before the turbine housing, not a disadvantage. And yes it matters, it's the entire basis of how twin scroll works.
I think he is asking why not have the runners connect at the flange instead of inches before.
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:13 AM
  #80  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,634
Total Cats: 431
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
I think he is asking why not have the runners connect at the flange instead of inches before.
If that's the question then I don't think that would have a noticeable effect with only a couple inches difference.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.