Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Cordycord's epic tube frame build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 06:57 PM
  #1001  
GeneSplicer's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,101
Total Cats: 180
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

So true...
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 02:14 AM
  #1002  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by GeneSplicer
So true...
I just saw that gay thread and wow...just, wow. The worst part about owning a Miata is now NOT having to tell dad you're gay, but that you might get a package from Genesplicer.
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 08:08 AM
  #1003  
golftdibrad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 878
Total Cats: 79
From: Maryville TN
Default

Originally Posted by GeneSplicer
lol, the only thing I contribute to MT is gayness
"uphold the reputation of MT.net"
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 11:11 PM
  #1004  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default We has trubo

Oaky here's the deal; I spoke with "He with the knowledge of Miata" about my turbo coolant lines, and he essentially said that I have a labeling problem. Call "in" "out" and "out" "in" and there's no problem. I pretty much agreed, except for what Bruce alluded to: is the water pick-up before or after the thermostat?

With the current setup at the front and back of the block, the water wouldn't really flow until the thermostat opened up, even though I've opened up the weep holes in the thermostat a bit. So I decided that since Mazda was kind enough to leave an oil and water galley open for use, we'd use it. So standard setup, no problems.

Richard's Performance Muffler in Oceanside fabricated the dump-pipe beautifully. The TIG welds are top quality--really nice--and really improved over the last pipe. It's made from 2.5" stainless, and makes a 40 degree and 80 degree bend to get to the muffler. Heat shielding is still needed, but the basics are there.
Attached Thumbnails Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140630_125611.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140630_125712.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140630_140715.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140630_172110.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140630_144039.jpg  

Old Jun 30, 2014 | 11:46 PM
  #1005  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

That wideband wont live there for long. Way too hot. You want it somewhere by the tranny.
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 01:43 AM
  #1006  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
That wideband wont live there for long. Way too hot. You want it somewhere by the tranny.
I saw it, and thought, "Naw, they know what they're doing."
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 03:50 AM
  #1007  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

If you fit a large copper heatsink then it'll live fine in that location - assuming it's a road car.

On track it'll still overheat and cook.
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 06:57 AM
  #1008  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

What are you going to use for insulation between the downpipe and the brake system?

I agree with tripple88a, the wideband should probably be 18 to 36 inches away from the turbine according to most manufacturers. But shielding it should help it to last as a street car. If you plan to track it or otherwise drive it in anger you will not have good life out of it.

You will be much happier with the water system with the way you have it now. That is the best possible arrangement.
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #1009  
GeneSplicer's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,101
Total Cats: 180
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
That wideband wont live there for long. Way too hot. You want it somewhere by the tranny.
I was told the same thing. It's even in the instructions that we overlooked.
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 09:17 PM
  #1010  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default I listen....I just don't read (instructions)

The changes happened quickly, and that's mainly due to my partners in crime, Bent Motorsports. These guys not only weld and fabricate, they cnc and play with SolidWorks. Their specialty is actually suspension fabrication and setup. Go figure. Our little business park has some really talented people.

The wideband sensor was moved about 36" away from the turbo and situated so that moisture doesn't pool when it's not on.

A heat shield was made for the brake bits, and I'm sure we'll probably be adding more as we move along. It's a good (looking) start for now. Hell, I should call it a "sweet shield".

The MSPNP2 now reads for 700cc injectors and will be on the dyno very soon.
Attached Thumbnails Cordycord's epic tube frame build-o2-move.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-new-heat-shield.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-sweet-shield.jpg  
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 11:18 PM
  #1011  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default getting ready for dyno day

I drove the Catfish over to Delicous Tuning this afternoon in anticipation of tomorrow's dyno session. The car had a high idle and there was a definite stumble/surge when gas was applied, but overall everything seemed to be working.

A FM boost gauge barely made it past zero on the way over as I had no intention of testing the turbo prior to the dyno. Hopefully I'll have a dyno sheet and a little video to show tomorrow, and not oil and case particles littering the floor.
Attached Thumbnails Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140702_164607.jpg   Cordycord's epic tube frame build-20140702_164602.jpg  
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 11:58 PM
  #1012  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default better than I expected

I spent the entire day in Escondido today, dynoing the Catfish. It was hot, muggy and the car seemed to do well anyway. The dyno is owned by Mike at Infamous Performance in Escondido and the tuner is William Knose of "Delicious Tuning".

Bill wasn't that familiar with the MSPNP software, but seemed to pick it up fairly quick. He also spends most of his time tuning Subies, GTRs and Porsches. He also tuned Ken Block's car for Gymkhana 1 & 2, so he knows what he's doing.

The dyno is a Mustang eddy current 4wd unit, and it works well. Mike said that they've done "back to back" dynos with the DSport Dynojet dyno, and the Dynojet reads about 17-20% higher. That said, these are some pretty impressive numbers for a 22 year old 1.6 on pump gas.

The number and AF ratios all lined up on the dyno, but on a little test run on the street with Martin Wilson (Monster Miata), Martin said he heard a little detonation. NOT GOOD. Bill backed off the timing and a second street drive produced no knock. The dyno is so damn loud with the fans that it just wasn't noticeable.

Okay experts, what do you think?
Attached Thumbnails Cordycord's epic tube frame build-cat.jpg  
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 01:47 AM
  #1013  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default Delicious Tuning

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dwe...ature=youtu.be
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 01:58 AM
  #1014  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Am I reading correctly that at 14 psi it made 190 whp and 170 wtq?
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 02:06 AM
  #1015  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Am I reading correctly that at 14 psi it made 190 whp and 170 wtq?
Boost kinda crept up there....

It's a Mustang eddy current dyno, so those numbers are low compared to dynojet.

edit...the tune has been backed off from these numbers. They were getting a bit out of my "comfort zone".
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 01:11 PM
  #1016  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Yeah an extra 20% would put it at 230whp on a dynojet which is pretty impressive for a 1.6. And good spool for a churbo.
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #1017  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

not bad at all for a low reading mustang dyno.
I bet its a hoot, and I bet it woulda put down like 90 when it was n/a
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 01:54 PM
  #1018  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
It's a Mustang eddy current dyno, so those numbers are accurate, unlike dynojet.
Fixed.

Nice numbers for churbo B6
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 09:05 PM
  #1019  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
Fixed.

Nice numbers for churbo B6
Nope. Dynojets are all the same numbers, normal mustangs are ~5-10% lower than a dynojet. This mustang is even low for a mustang at 17-20% lower. If you want to compare between different locations you have to use a dynojet nothing else is a real number.
Old Jul 4, 2014 | 09:23 PM
  #1020  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

There is a difference between consistency and accuracy.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.