No Money, Having Fun Exocet
#23
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From what i'm being told they use a 3ed party to deal will all the shipping cost comparisons, who is faster from A to B, ect. UPS claim is between EXO and UPS as I never signed for anything. Next frame I will pick up or direct ship (no hubs).
#24
UPS has been a nightmare for several fellow Exocet customers. My frame got lost at my local hub, and UPS sent me on a wild goose chase around the region to find it. To be fair, they ended up making things right and liftgate-delivering it to my house.
Exomotive has had to change their packaging several times to deal with the damage caused during transit.
Exomotive has had to change their packaging several times to deal with the damage caused during transit.
#30
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
The labor for blasting is more then then cost of them building a new one (their cost not retail). There is a special clear coat on the frame that is now ruined and there is no way to fix it or the under color.
#33
TL: DR - Exomotive doesn't have the financial motivation to sell you "scratch and dent" products.
There's not enough potential volume in the market to warrant selling "scratch and dent" - even for us cheapskates. If they sell it *scratch and dent*, for, say , $1000 cheaper, then UPS only has to pay $1000 for the losses on the item, and now, they have still sold a total of one car. If, however, they claim a total loss and it's not resellable, UPS pays the full value of the car, and then you have to pay the full value of another car, then they've sold a total of two cars - this quickly becomes a big deal if their anticipated market volume is only - say - 2000 cars. You buy one, it gets damaged, they get the income from two.
If their market and distribution systems were similar to...say...washing machines:
If Maytag distributes their own product, then they have no one to make a claim against but themselves, so a "total write-off" of the product directly hits their own pocketbook. At the same time, if they damage a mid-line washing machine and sell it as "scratch and dent", the "scratch and dent" now becomes a differentiation point for a penny-pinching consumer who might have otherwise bought the bottom-of-the-line Whirlpool. Selling the scratch and dent, then, becomes a way to sell one additional unit. It also avoids the costs of shipping the unit back to the MFR for repair, which means it's probably cheaper for Maytag to subsidize Lowes the $200 for them to sell you the "scratch and dent" washing machine than it would be for Maytag to ship it back to themselves, repair the aesthetic damage, and reship it to Lowes.
There's not enough potential volume in the market to warrant selling "scratch and dent" - even for us cheapskates. If they sell it *scratch and dent*, for, say , $1000 cheaper, then UPS only has to pay $1000 for the losses on the item, and now, they have still sold a total of one car. If, however, they claim a total loss and it's not resellable, UPS pays the full value of the car, and then you have to pay the full value of another car, then they've sold a total of two cars - this quickly becomes a big deal if their anticipated market volume is only - say - 2000 cars. You buy one, it gets damaged, they get the income from two.
If their market and distribution systems were similar to...say...washing machines:
If Maytag distributes their own product, then they have no one to make a claim against but themselves, so a "total write-off" of the product directly hits their own pocketbook. At the same time, if they damage a mid-line washing machine and sell it as "scratch and dent", the "scratch and dent" now becomes a differentiation point for a penny-pinching consumer who might have otherwise bought the bottom-of-the-line Whirlpool. Selling the scratch and dent, then, becomes a way to sell one additional unit. It also avoids the costs of shipping the unit back to the MFR for repair, which means it's probably cheaper for Maytag to subsidize Lowes the $200 for them to sell you the "scratch and dent" washing machine than it would be for Maytag to ship it back to themselves, repair the aesthetic damage, and reship it to Lowes.
#37
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
Was saving these till they were installed on the car but that wont be any time soon.
https://www.facebook.com/NMHFR
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?...1413477&type=1
https://www.facebook.com/NMHFR
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?...1413477&type=1
#40
The world is wrong cause some company won't give away a lightly damaged frame to you for pennies?
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this process. This way a small company gets more business/work to stay afloat, the stupid shippers learn a valuable lesson that will motivate them to be more careful next time, and the customer doesn't have to settle for some beat up frame.
The only down side is OP now having to wait, which sucks.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this process. This way a small company gets more business/work to stay afloat, the stupid shippers learn a valuable lesson that will motivate them to be more careful next time, and the customer doesn't have to settle for some beat up frame.
The only down side is OP now having to wait, which sucks.