Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Austin, TX seizes veteran's home

 
Old 05-10-2012, 04:29 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,455
Total Cats: 81
Default Austin, TX seizes veteran's home

JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:10 PM
  #2  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The non-murder part.)
Posts: 28,975
Total Cats: 2,818
Default

So, the argument is that people who are military veterans should be exempted from having to follow the local building codes?
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:16 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 375
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez View Post
So, the argument is that people who are military veterans should be exempted from having to follow the local building codes?
building codes are enforced with SWAT and interrogations?
MD323 is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:21 PM
  #4  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The non-murder part.)
Posts: 28,975
Total Cats: 2,818
Default

Originally Posted by MD323 View Post
building codes are enforced with SWAT and interrogations?
To the best of my knowledge, building codes are enforced in the same manner as any other civil regulation- with whatever level of coercion is required to induce compliance.

The article is vaguely written in some points, however it certainly suggests that the homeowner had resisted prior efforts to obtain compliance.

If, hypothetically, I were to default on the mortgage of my home, and then resist efforts to evict me with force, then I would eventually expect an armed police response. Same basic idea here.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:32 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 375
Total Cats: 3
Default

I am still digging for a better article, but in the attached video from this one the home owner states he opened the door and was rushed by police, taken to a command post and interrogated about "suspicious barrels" in his backyard. as well as the searched all of his personaly belongings and took his guns.

this all seems fine for a code violation? I understand your point that building code needs enforced by all means needed to get someone to comply but even the timeline from the first citation (08) to them destroying and confiscating the house ('10) seems alittle out of place. there is no mention of court subpenas (im not denying they may exist) which when ignored would result in a bench warrant for his arrest.

even then being the victim of a erroneous bench warrant I can tell you they have no right to enter ones property for any other reason but to secure the person.
MD323 is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:48 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 375
Total Cats: 3
Default

I cannot find any local or otherwise news agency covering this. all other articles site back to this one. so I do have to question the lack of information on the other side of this story
MD323 is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 02:52 PM
  #7  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,098
Total Cats: 368
Default

I keep reading the article and I keep seeing:
A retaining wall was constructed and approved by an engineer
Only a privacy infringement can trigger awareness of his potentially un-permitted underground shelter.

For those who don't know Austin, the city has been foaming at the mouth to bulldoze that side of town and expand downtown and business there.
hustler is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 03:51 PM
  #8  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The non-murder part.)
Posts: 28,975
Total Cats: 2,818
Default

Originally Posted by MD323 View Post
even the timeline from the first citation (08) to them destroying and confiscating the house ('10) seems alittle out of place. there is no mention of court subpenas (im not denying they may exist) which when ignored would result in a bench warrant for his arrest.
Precisely.

The purpose of that article is to inflame public opinion by presenting only one-half of a story, and including just enough facts to make it seem that the police / city / etc acted unjustly.


Also, I see no mention of them either destroying or confiscating the house. They took steps to rectify the code violations, and the held the house until the owner paid for the cost of said repairs. I'm pretty sure that if you check out the relevant statues in Austin, you'll find this to be legal.



Originally Posted by hustler View Post
I keep reading the article and I keep seeing:
A retaining wall was constructed and approved by an engineer
Only a privacy infringement can trigger awareness of his potentially un-permitted underground shelter.
Well, either that, or if the work he was doing underground was causing subsidances and sinkholes at the surface. This is what I read:

"According to city records, code compliance inspectors visited Del Rio's house in 2008 and 2009 in response to neighbors' complaints about holes."
Joe Perez is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
67
03-16-2019 08:07 PM
chris101
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
10-09-2015 09:08 AM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
09-30-2015 10:28 PM
Squiblez
Meet and Greet
1
09-23-2015 01:50 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Austin, TX seizes veteran's home


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.