|
A peel.
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 920972)
And if the Foreman instructs the jury completely incorrectly, with no basis whatsoever on current law? In fact, his instructions directly contradict current law?
This is what has my panties in a bunch Brainy. The foreman guided the jury through a process based on his own opinion - and his own opinion directly contradicts our current law. It's a complete and total fucking 180 from any intellectual property law we've ever had in the history of the US, and he likely completely ignored the jury instructions with respect to this part. For my profession? This is absolutely terrifying if it holds through appeal. Seriously. We're (My profession we're, not MT we're) so unbelievably fucked if the foreman's opinions are held up in court - it's nigh impossible to have prior art, which means the patent and copyright wars are going to entirely new levels. |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 920793)
Nye said nothing about what you are talking about, Brainy.
And I'm seriously disappointed in people claiming to be "critics of evolution". Many of them can't even tell the difference between the big bang theory and the theory of evolution. Long ago in a dusty village full of hunger, pain and strife a man came forth with a vision of truth and the way to a better life he was convinced he had the answer and he compelled people to follow along but the hunger never vanished and the man was banished and the village dried up and died at a time when wise men peered through glass tubes toward the sky the heavens changed in predictable ways and one man was able to find that he had thought he found the answer and he was quick to write his revelation but as they were scutinized in his colleagues eyes he soon became a mockery don't tell me about the answer 'cause then another one will come along soon I don't believe you have the answer I've got ideas too but if you've got enough naivete and you've got conviction then the answer is perfect for you an urban sprawl sits choking on its discharge overwhelmed by industry searching for a modern day savior from another place inclined toward charity everyone's begging for an answer without regard to validity the searching never ends it goes on and on for eternity |
|
Whoops. Arizona Republican Jan Brewer endorses Obama!
|
2 Attachment(s)
|
I want to see the above animated for those Taiwanese news shows.
like this: |
Even if he did earn all his own money, he's still RICH, and rich = bad. Am I right or am I right? |
rich = bad++
|
On November 18, 2011, a note penned by Barrack Obama himeself was read outloud at the Heavy-D funeral.
In Aug of 2012, parents of 30 dead Navy Seals received boilerplate letters signed by an auto pen. |
|
Originally Posted by fmowry
(Post 921251)
Whoops. Arizona Republican Jan Brewer endorses Obama!
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1334618388 |
|
|
youll like this then Bruce:
|
Who does this guy think he is?! Just because the Olympics ended up a HUGE success and made over $100 million, does he really need to rub it in our faces? |
to be fair, it's not like he didnt get paid. he did it for legal tax purposes. 100% legal, and 100% ethical.
|
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 921800)
to be fair, it's not like he didnt get paid. he did it for legal tax purposes. 100% legal, and 100% ethical.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM. |
|
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands