Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment

 
Old 12-20-2014, 10:59 AM
  #1  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The non-murder part.)
Posts: 29,350
Total Cats: 2,939
Default Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment

Cliffs:

As compared to gasoline-powered cars, vehicles fueled by ethenol increase environmental health impacts by 80%, and EVs charged off the grid increase environmental health impacts by 200% (they kill a lot more people.)

The full paper: Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States

Paper is written by reputable environmental scientists in academic with no financial stake in transportation fuel, and published by the National Academy of Sciences.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 11:08 AM
  #2  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,635
Total Cats: 2,318
Default

and that's all wiped out when 1 volcano erupts, right?
Braineack is online now  
Old 12-20-2014, 11:20 AM
  #3  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The non-murder part.)
Posts: 29,350
Total Cats: 2,939
Default

Unless you have figured out a way to build a volcano-powered car, no.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 12:47 PM
  #4  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,651
Total Cats: 111
Default

Interesting article, thanks for sharing it, Joe.

Something interesting I noticed is the lack of discussion of EV nuclear powered vehicles. 20% of our power generation in the US is by nuclear fuel (40% by coal). It would be pretty easy to use this study as part of a baseline to further push the power generation by nuclear fuel agenda.
__________________
DIYAutoTune.com Tech Support
10AE-T|BEGi S4|MSPNP-Pro EMS|Enthuza Duals|6UL|Etc
Track Rat|2001|VVT|MS3-Pro EMS|Enthuza|Exocet in Progress

Originally Posted by concealer404 View Post
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 01:13 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,118
Total Cats: 843
Default

I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Someone posted an article, which led me to doing some research, which lead to other articles...you get the idea.

So. Thorium reactors. Why haven't we got them all over by now? Yes, I know, politics and stupid people. But bear with me a sec.

Assume some rich guy likes them. Not your average won the lottery type guy, but someone with huge financial reserves. Gates, Buffet, Koch bros, etc. They have the finances to push past the BS, to actually get something built. Maybe start by replacing an existing plant. It seems to me that some of the more visionary types (Elon Musk?) would jump all over this. Once one is in place, I think it's safe to say we'd see dozens within a few years, and hundreds within a decade.

Other than the typical ignorance surrounding nukes, what is stopping this from happening? Or is ignorance really so prevalent in this country among those that make the decisions?
rleete is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 01:37 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,932
Total Cats: 318
Default

In Fallout lore, fossil fuel reserves dried up and everything went nuclear powered, including cars.



This idea apparently came from an idea Ford had for a nuclear powered concept car

Attached Thumbnails Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-chryslusad2.png   Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-nuclear-powered-car-1.jpg  
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 02:08 PM
  #7  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,017
Total Cats: 289
Default

Nuclear powered cars are no concept.
In 1985, a scientist by the name of Dr. Emmett Brown built a plutonium powered Delorean.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 02:25 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Goleta, Southern California
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 26
Default

^was also powered by bananas and beer cans in a pinch.

So how about model s charged completely by solar? Still bad new for the planet?
williams805 is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 02:49 PM
  #9  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,017
Total Cats: 289
Default

^**** yeah it's still bad. Solar panels create microwave radiation, and cause the deformation of water molecules. Which is why most hybrid owners are victims of hate crimes.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 04:53 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 214
Total Cats: 29
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen View Post
Nuclear powered cars are no concept.
In 1985, a scientist by the name of Dr. Emmett Brown built a plutonium powered Delorean.
The internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has.
TalkingPie is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 05:23 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
chriscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Carrollton TX
Posts: 1,702
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by williams805 View Post
So how about model s charged completely by solar?
Have you seen a solar panel factory?



C
Attached Thumbnails Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment-i-a59856c15fe00d238cca3194c9d8c93a-ir_pollution.jpg  
chriscar is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 05:57 PM
  #12  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,017
Total Cats: 289
Default

Originally Posted by TalkingPie View Post
The internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has.
Not sure if serious...
thirdgen is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,382
Total Cats: 60
Default

Originally Posted by rleete View Post
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Someone posted an article, which led me to doing some research, which lead to other articles...you get the idea.

So. Thorium reactors. Why haven't we got them all over by now? Yes, I know, politics and stupid people.
Without spending a second on Wikipedia wasn't India supposed to work on sub-critical Thorium reactors, mostly due to their abundance of Thorium and no accessible Uranium?
I have not heard much in mainstream news for several years.

Vehicles driven by direct electricity (overhead wires or inductive) and having a spare engine to use on non-powered roads might have some merit, all other electrical solutions seems to be doomed on a large scale (e.g. 30+% of all transports).
There are special cases where I would not mind an electric one (commuting and free charging at work), but that is based on European level of taxes on dino fuel and no extra (transportation related) taxes on electricity (yet). Give it some volume and those taxes need to be sourced somehow.
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 08:00 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 214
Total Cats: 29
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen View Post
Not sure if serious...
It's a direct quote from Dr. Emmett Brown. Although the time machine's time circuits were powered by 1.21 Jiggywatts (Hollywood says it's an SI unit of power, wanna fight about it?) of electricity, the car always moved under the gasoline engine's power (except when it flew due to the hover conversion it underwent in 2015 or when a steam locomotive pushed it in 1885).

It's science.
TalkingPie is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 08:04 PM
  #15  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,017
Total Cats: 289
Default

Touché.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 08:34 AM
  #16  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,827
Total Cats: 55
Default

Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 08:51 AM
  #17  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,017
Total Cats: 289
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann View Post
Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
Like a Honda Civic Si?
thirdgen is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 08:57 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,382
Total Cats: 60
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann View Post
Pretty sure gigga watts is an SI unit.
Watt is an SI unit (Kg* m² / s³), Giga is a unit prefix (10⁹).
"jiggy" is a Hollywood unit prefix.

A Googolwatt might be larger than a Jiggywatt, but who cares
What's a Jizzywhat?
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 09:26 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,827
Total Cats: 55
Default

I'm sure he said a word which he pronounced, ' jiggah what'.

Jiggah what = giggawatt?
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 09:28 AM
  #20  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,827
Total Cats: 55
Default

For example, the format '.gif' is pronounced jiff
nitrodann is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Gasoline-powered cars are saving the environment


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.