The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
#8443
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
I dont blame Trump for a raid that was more than likely planned months in advance and on the flip side, I wont give credit to Obama for killing bin laden. That credit whether successful or not, falls on the shoulders of those brave men and women whom carry out the missions.
Not saying what I have heard is right or wrong, as I am no longer cleared, nor do I know all the details. I am just going off what I saw in various main stream media sites.
#8444
I dont blame Trump for a raid that was more than likely planned months in advance and on the flip side, I wont give credit to Obama for killing bin laden. That credit whether successful or not, falls on the shoulders of those brave men and women whom carry out the missions.
And I'm not referring to either of the missions you used as examples.
#8450
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Braineack can't read them. It is against the law for him. I need to start going through the leaks as they are things I find very interesting. Does not surprise me that the CIA is trying to do what they are doing.
#8453
Surely you can do better...
https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/timeline
Both parties are quite guilty. Remember, it all started so "they" could protect us against the boogeyman...
https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/timeline
Both parties are quite guilty. Remember, it all started so "they" could protect us against the boogeyman...
#8454
Surely you can do better...
https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/timeline
Both parties are quite guilty. Remember, it all started so "they" could protect us against the boogeyman...
https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/timeline
Both parties are quite guilty. Remember, it all started so "they" could protect us against the boogeyman...
Twas a joke, sir. You and I can finally agree on something....the patriot act.
#8456
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,046
Total Cats: 6,607
Isn't it technically against the law for all of us? Brainey just happens to have an employer that gives a ****.
We went through the same thing a few years ago at Harris. IS and HR very strongly warned employees that visiting wikileaks exposed Harris' unclassified networks to classified information, and this was a violation of all sorts of Federal laws & contracts. It wouldn't have done any actual harm, it would just have (potentially) gotten the company into hot water with some of its clients like the CIA, NSA, FBI, DOD, DHS, etc.
Anyway, this thread has gone to **** again thanks to Brainey's spam-posting, so here's Canadian Member of Parliament Belinda Stronach:
We went through the same thing a few years ago at Harris. IS and HR very strongly warned employees that visiting wikileaks exposed Harris' unclassified networks to classified information, and this was a violation of all sorts of Federal laws & contracts. It wouldn't have done any actual harm, it would just have (potentially) gotten the company into hot water with some of its clients like the CIA, NSA, FBI, DOD, DHS, etc.
Anyway, this thread has gone to **** again thanks to Brainey's spam-posting, so here's Canadian Member of Parliament Belinda Stronach:
Last edited by Joe Perez; 03-08-2017 at 11:06 AM.