Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

1.6: AT long block, MT head?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default 1.6: AT long block, MT head?

This is all totally hypothetical, but since winter is here, I've got four months of fabrication.


Here's the story: Blew my 1.6 MT engine and thinking of swapping a T2 RX-7 13b into it. However, would a GReddy 1.6 be easier? For the 7, i'd have to fab up engine mounts, and rebuild a frankenstein trans (front bh and gears from 7, rear housing from Miata), whereas the 1.6, I'm thinking of the auto long block (lower compression) and MT head (cams). So would that be a better option than a bolt-on to a 1.6 MT engine?
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
F20turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
Default

dropping a 13B into the miata requires a dry sump oiling system since the rotary would sit VERY low into the miata chassis. Its not worth it when you consider the cost unless you are just some rotary nut ( I know people like this )

You can use a 1.6L AT long block with a 1.6L MT head since the 1.6L MT head has better cams.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default

What about rebuilding the oil pan? I know I can do it to clear the crossmember, and I can weld, just do not have a good welder.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #4  
F20turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iluvtruenos
What about rebuilding the oil pan? I know I can do it to clear the crossmember, and I can weld, just do not have a good welder.
If you think you can retool the oil pan to work then go ahead and try it I suppose. I just know that the stock 13b pan will sit too low.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #5  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default

Any good websites to read up on the rotary oiling system?
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #6  
F20turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 737
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iluvtruenos
Any good websites to read up on the rotary oiling system?
not that I know of, sorry.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #7  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default

No worries. I just called up one of my friends, and he told me that the 13b oil pan does just that, hold oil, and nothing else. Meaning that a dry sump system could be made for as cheap as $30.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #8  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

am i missing something dont all oil pans just hold oil. or are there special oil pans that do other stuff
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #9  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default

No, on the 7 it's much easier because the oil does not have to flow through galleries into the oil pan. There's just a tube that drains the oil into it. On a piston engine, you have to accomodate for the oil draining from galleries into the pan, all that fun stuff. On the rotary, I can just extend the input/output tubes, and weld up a custom oil pan. Teehee.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #10  
Pitlab77's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,914
Total Cats: 5
From: Houston
Default

doesnt the AT have lower comp pistons
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #11  
getsidewaysd1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 759
Total Cats: 0
From: NAS Oceana/VA
Default

Originally Posted by Pitlab77
doesnt the AT have lower comp pistons
Ahhhhhhh ya. Thats the whole point!
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #12  
iluvtruenos's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Total Cats: 0
Default

Ya, lower compression long block (good for boost) mated with more agressive cams. Win/win.
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 01:43 AM
  #13  
4sfed5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 10
Default

Having seen first hand a 13b conversion take place i can tell you guys the following......

*The sump did NOT require modifying,(i guess it depends on car it came from)
*The body needed to be releived at the very top of the transmission tunnel where it meets the firewall, to clear the bell housing as does the area around the gear shifter area...this is because the rotary engine "crankshaft" sits slightly higher than a piston engine so the gear box is held slightly higher although it retains the PPF on a frankenstein gearbox.
*The crossmember was modified to fit the engine....new engine mounts were made to come forward and down to meet the front mounting points on the engine.
Ill tey to get some pics next time im over to see it again.
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 02:24 AM
  #14  
turbopezz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 865
Total Cats: 0
Default

some pictures ive found when searchimg.
Attached Thumbnails 1.6: AT long block, MT head?-subframe-001.jpg   1.6: AT long block, MT head?-subframe-005.jpg   1.6: AT long block, MT head?-subframe-009.jpg   1.6: AT long block, MT head?-subframe-011.jpg  
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #15  
miatamania's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Couldn't you just use A/T pistons? or are the rods/crank different as well?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
JxPhan
Meet and Greet
3
Oct 2, 2015 02:17 AM
btabor
ECUs and Tuning
10
Sep 28, 2015 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.