Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

210whp from 0.9bar on T3/T4 turbo sound wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #21  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

depends. I like the 94 for various reasons.
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:30 PM
  #22  
MrStevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Total Cats: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
Default

reasons such as?

I know the later ones had 2 or so more hp but also more weight, so its hard to say I know, would just like to know what other people think
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #23  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the 94 has:
ODB-I
9.0:1 CR
larger brakes
larger clutch
torsen diff
4.1 rear
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #24  
saedrin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 248
Total Cats: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

+1 for 94'

I wish I could do away with emissions equipment..
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #25  
Oscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
the 94 has:
ODB-I
9.0:1 CR
larger brakes
larger clutch
torsen diff
4.1 rear
Thought it was 8.8:1 CR?
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #26  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

i think it was still just 9.0:1, either way that's low, compared the the +9.5:1 of the rest of the blocks.
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #27  
ScottFW's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
From: Falls Church, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
Thought it was 8.8:1 CR?
My FSM says 9.0:1. I've seen 8.8 posted a bunch before, don't know where that number came from.
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #28  
MrStevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Total Cats: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
Default

9 CR sounds perfect for a turbo, well stronger internals would be good for large power but im not going for that if i did a job. I want something that can be totally reliable and used all the time with no worries. what is the compression ratio of the 1.6 then?
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #29  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by ScottFW
My FSM says 9.0:1. I've seen 8.8 posted a bunch before, don't know where that number came from.
oh yeah now i remember...i cant remember why, but that seems to be the myth

1.6L was 9.4:1, 9.0:1 in auto.
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #30  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Should be making closer to 300 hp with that sized turbo and ~12psi

I dont buy that the turbo is "too big" to make power. It certainly is of some of the larger T3/T4 turbos, and Im sure it doesnt start build serious boost until 4k+ rpm, but once its spooled it should make lots of power.
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #31  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

A turbine operates via a pressure ratio and the turbine must make the compressor spin fast enough to produce the required airflow at the specified boost level.

Assuming this has a .63 A/R housing and a Stage III turbine wheel, it's plausible that this causes the turbo to operate way outside it's efficiency area [I'm just touching on the hotside here].

The pressure ratio before and after the turbine will be more equal due to the large size of the wheel and the space in between the blades, so there is less power being forced on it since the exhaust can pretty much pass straight through, while gradually gracing across the blades. This will also reduce the temps, increasing the density and slowly the exhaust velocity. yada yada yada.


this is just my hypothesis for the low power...

Last edited by Braineack; Oct 5, 2010 at 03:21 PM.
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #32  
MrStevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Total Cats: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
Default

The setup looks so good though!!

I guess some things just weren't done right to get the proper power. FM recommended to change the turbo, injectors and throw in a hydra nemesis, then it would be a beast! probably stress the engine a lot but hey!
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #33  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
The turbine must make the compressor spin fast enough to produce the required airflow at the specified boost level.
So you think its just surging?

I dont agree with it, but I know that you can successful run way oversized turbos like that. Ive seen 35Rs on 1.6L engines, and a 35R is massive compared to that turbo.

Im much more inclined to think something else is happening. Like POS tuning.

Id buy it. Build it. Give it 20 psi.
Then the turbo will be fulfilling its capabilities a bit better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 PM.