DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Auto Tune, a better way?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2016, 11:01 PM
  #21  
Newb
 
fried_rice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

What I did was turn on AFR correction, which gets it very close cruising around using the auto tune.

I have a bunch of failsafes, AFR/PSI, Oil Pressure, Coolant temp, Oil Temp, Over Boost, knock, Fuel Pressure, etc. With an LED light triggered in my face along with massive timing pull or fuel/spark cut. That saves you from looking at 20 gauges while doing WOT by yourself with a laptop.

Log every WOT pull. View the log manually afterwards looking at RPM vs PSI vs AFR. Compare that to your AFR table, Mine is 11-11.5AFR everywhere above spooling PSI. So at low RPM and Low PSI I may have 13.5-12.5AFR to get a bit of extra spool.

Look at the AFR vs targeted AFR vs amount auto tune adjusted to get to what it thinks the AFR you need is. Manually add or subtract if auto-tune didn't add or subtract enough. I guess mine is set relatively passively, as I would want it to be. I'm accustomed to manually adjusting the tune, but a small percentage change and highlighted cells is very easy to compare fuel cell vs graph.
fried_rice is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 10:48 AM
  #22  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

As I'm autotuning, I don't constantly re-save my tune. I noticed you said you did. I may be wrong but I believe it gives a larger sample size for a particular cell when it isn't re-saved so often. :shrug: I drive for quite a while before saving the tune.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 10:59 AM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
As I'm autotuning, I don't constantly re-save my tune. I noticed you said you did. I may be wrong but I believe it gives a larger sample size for a particular cell when it isn't re-saved so often. :shrug: I drive for quite a while before saving the tune.
I don't think that is the case. I save my tune quite a bit as well. It clears out the chart that shows actual changes but leaves the chart that shows cell weighting so I assume the sample size and weighting remains untouched.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 11:03 AM
  #24  
Newb
 
fried_rice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

I haven't noticed a difference either way. Only thing is if you do save the tune you can re-upload the changed file into VE analyze which also gives a predictive change. Otherwise it's going off the first tune before any modification. I usually save each tune as something different, but not after each pull, after each session which usually includes a couple pulls and maybe 30minutes to two hours driving while I'm focusing on a specific area..

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
I don't think that is the case. I save my tune quite a bit as well. It clears out the chart that shows actual changes but leaves the chart that shows cell weighting so I assume the sample size and weighting remains untouched.
fried_rice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EpicOtter
ECUs and Tuning
9
05-31-2016 01:35 PM
elior77
MEGAsquirt
5
03-30-2016 02:49 PM
mackey
General Miata Chat
16
03-21-2016 05:03 PM
Mohanad A Reda
DIY Turbo Discussion
13
03-10-2016 02:25 PM
ThePass
DIY Turbo Discussion
1
07-18-2006 01:24 AM



Quick Reply: Auto Tune, a better way?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.