Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

? best year 1.8L to Turbo 1994 to 1997

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 07:56 AM
  #1  
fastcraftTom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
From: North Lima, OH
Default ? best year 1.8L to Turbo 1994 to 1997

Hello Group

I am newbe to group. I want to build a 1.8L first gen engine for a Lotus Se7en style car. Currenntly do own a 1992 Miata also.
Of the years 1994,1995,1996,1997 are there any that are more advantages than others to use as a core for Turbo build. I did try search but could not seem to narrow down to my specific topic. I am on the fastrack to learn how to Turbo and I did buy Corky;s book, Very good read. Looking to get an honest 230 RWHP.
Thanks
Tom
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
spaztikcamel's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
Total Cats: 2
From: Ballina Australia
Default

for that power any would do just fine
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 08:37 AM
  #3  
chokeasphyxia's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 331
Total Cats: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

The earlier 1.8's were lower compression = more boost friendly, but I'd just get whatever engine has the lowest miles you can. Do compression check to make sure it's healthy before turbo.

Also, people like the '94-'95 because it's obd-1 and '94 has real oil pressure gauge, but that probably doesn't make any difference for you.
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 08:51 AM
  #4  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

There are also oil and coolant feed ports on the exhaust side of the '94 and early '95 blocks. Very convenient although not a deal breaker if you find a nice engine from another year.
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by chokeasphyxia
Also, people like the '94-'95 because it's obd-1 and '94 has real oil pressure gauge, but that probably doesn't make any difference for you.

and a lower CR compared to the 96-97
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #6  
fastcraftTom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
From: North Lima, OH
Default

Thanks for the help. Seems like 94 or 95 is best. But I may have come across a wrecked 1997 with lower miles. I would prefer 94 or 95. From my previous lurking seems to remember the comp of 94, 95 to be 9 to 1 and 96 and 97 to be 9.5 to on. I also seem to remember some commenst regarding con rods, are there differences. I would prefer 94 or 95 but I may not want to pass up a lower mile 97. What would be a good estimate of max usuable boost for 97. I will probably use a Megasquirt PNP.
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 10:02 PM
  #7  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

94-95 = 8.8:1 (later 95 models had 9.0:1)
96-97 = 9.0:1
99-00 = 9.5:1
01-05 = 10.0:1 (except MSM = 9.5:1)

IIRC, connecting rods are the same across the board.

Boost pressure with Turbo X ≠ boost pressure with Turbo Y, so you can't measure it like that. But around 250 is the safe limit on stock internals (and for the 5-speed transmission), although people have taken it higher without issue. It's always all in the tune.

Just fyi, all of this and more to get you on the right path are well covered in this forum, a quick search will answer 99.9% of your questions.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nbdooey
Miata parts for sale/trade
9
Aug 30, 2017 09:50 PM
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
Nov 22, 2016 09:01 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
zephyrusaurai
Meet and Greet
2
Sep 28, 2015 10:59 PM
Rhidell
Meet and Greet
1
Sep 27, 2015 09:42 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.