Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Determining appropriate A/F ratios.

Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default Determining appropriate A/F ratios.

You dont have a dyno, and you dont have a knock sensor.

How is tuning accomplished? what is a generally accepted target A/F ratio? Is A/F ratio constant throughout the rev range? How do you know what A/F ratio should be if you are cruising? If a turbo makes full boost at 3000rpm and you are cruising at 4000rpm, the engine doesn't make boost until you step on it?

I am trying to visualize the fuel tables that I see screen shots of, and if I remember correctly it was boost vs rpm. What data and, in what measurement, is filled into the table?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

14.7:1 cruise and idle. 12:1 in boost.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
14.7:1 cruise and idle. 12:1 in boost.
Who determined this number and how did they come to this optimal conclusion?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

cause 14.7:1 is the optimal burning ratio for gasoline.

Richening up the mixture to 12:1 results in a slower burn, moving the pressure peak later where there is more leverage and more torque. Anything richer is a waste of gas; it cannot provide any real additional cooling or slow the burn. Anythign leaner and the peak pressure increase, the spark ignites closer to TDC, the air charge is not cooled and you risk detonation.

Last edited by Braineack; Oct 19, 2007 at 03:18 PM.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #5  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Brain, Megamanual says going as high as 16:1 in light-load cruise is kosher. Any truth?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

yes. you dont need more than 2-10hp to cruise, so why waste gas.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
cause 14.7:1 is the optimal burning ratio for gasoline.

Richening up the mixture to 12:1 results in a slower burn, moving the pressure peak later where there is more leverage and more torque. Anything richer is a waste of gas; it cannot provide any real additional cooling or slow the burn.
So pretty much make sure you hit those numbers in the given conditions and thats all she wrote?

What about the numbers in the tables?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

what numbers in what table?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #9  
SloS13's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
Total Cats: 1
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
what numbers in what table?
Kitchen tables. Have you been reading this thread at all? Try and keep up.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #10  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

ok mr. smart guy. eat off that table.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #11  
Banninated's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Total Cats: 0
Default

Damn dude. I was just making a joke and I get banned? I was just poking fun because the guy mentions tables out of thin air.

I sent you free **** too. You suck.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #12  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

you didnt sound joking enough :gay: needs more silly gay smilies.


plus your name user name looked exactly like the OP, who i thought i was banning
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #13  
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Damn Scot, a bit harsh? He was just following up on the unanswered question in his first post...see the last sentence.

Is your new job making you feel inadequate? :gay:
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #14  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

no. i thought the op was being smart with me. i didnt even realize it was someone else.

about the tables. they are a % of fuel. based on rpm vs. MAP. only there to supply to fuel so you can tune it to your given AFR.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #15  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Scott, you and Loki gotta stop hanging out.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #16  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

so did you unban him or what? i was shocked at your reaction, slo-guy jokes a lot, so i didnt see it coming...
great thread btw, again, im on the learning side, keep the good info pile up in here, im reading carefully...maybe too carefully
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #17  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
no. i thought the op was being smart with me. i didnt even realize it was someone else.

about the tables. they are a % of fuel. based on rpm vs. MAP. only there to supply to fuel so you can tune it to your given AFR.
Woh, that could have ended badly. Good thing its straightened out.

So is there some sort of mathematical formula you can use to determine the percentage of fuel you would need to create a specific AFR based on rpm and map or is it unique to every car? I know its somewhat interchangeable between miatas, but never perfect unless cars are identical.

I ask because i am curious, can you measure your AFR only once the car is in motion or can you estimate it on the drawing board?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #18  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

You can figure it out with Volumetric Efficencies. Read the fuel tuning section of the megamanual.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #19  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
You can figure it out with Volumetric Efficencies. Read the fuel tuning section of the megamanual.
Yea thats pretty sweet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM
faviles5566
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 4, 2015 11:50 AM
faviles5566
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 4, 2015 11:50 AM
Slidin'Miata916
Miata parts for sale/trade
0
Jul 7, 2007 09:46 PM
sbrian2
General Miata Chat
13
Oct 31, 2006 01:02 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.