Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Does the pipe size really matter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #1  
Fritch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
From: Holiday, FL
Default Does the pipe size really matter?

Currently I'm not running an IC, but I'm piecing this together still. I've got an intercooler that I'm going to use and it has 2" inlets/outlets. Anyone know the outlet size on the GT2560 turbo from the FM kit? I can't remember offhand.

Anyways, does the pipe size really matter? Say I run 2" from the turbo to the IC, should I keep 2" up to the TB and just use a transition or bump up to 2.5" (think thats the TB size) after the IC all the way to the TB. Does it really make a difference at all?
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #2  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

it will effect flow eventualy and intake velocity as well as turbo spool but in the hp range you are likely to acheive sub 300whp i dount you notice to much difference
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #3  
Fritch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
From: Holiday, FL
Default

I figure 2" gives a lot more room to work with in bends etc
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #4  
VRTSid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Total Cats: 0
Default

I was thinking smaller diameter pipes would help spool and hit max boost earlier.

maybe it would limit peak HP under what it might be, but if I hit boost a little earlier wouldnt it be worth it?

I have 2.5 all around, I was thinking stepping down to 2" on the compressor side of the IC
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #5  
Fritch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
From: Holiday, FL
Default

yeah I'm not shooting for 300hp with this setup, most likely I'm just wanting ~200-220rwhp in the end... but who knows
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

It would be interesting to see a comparison between 2" and 2.5" charge pipes. I would suspect that the larger volume of air held in 2.5" pipes would offset any gains in velocity. Actually, I think velocity isn't that important in a boosted application.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #7  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

you typically don't need 2.5" until you need a t3/t04.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #8  
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

I'm planning on 2" right up to the TB.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #9  
VRTSid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
you typically don't need 2.5" until you need a t3/t04.
it does seem like over kill to me. but I'll deal with that later
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #10  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by VRTSid
it does seem like over kill to me. but I'll deal with that later
from what I understand, tubing size is more dependant upon displacement and volume, not pressure.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #11  
VRTSid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Total Cats: 0
Default

right I dont run a t3/4 so 2.5 is overkill.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I'm running 2.0" pre-IC and 2.5" post. works for me. Plenty of systems have been built with 2.0" all around.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:02 AM
  #13  
MX_Eva's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 698
Total Cats: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Mine is built 2 before and 2.5 after.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #14  
SamS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
From: Wisconsin
Default

Mine's 2.5 all around. The only adapter is from the commpressor to the first intercooler pipe. My intercooler has 2.5" inlet/outlet, so I bought a 2.5" universal pipe kit on ebay.

Note: 2.5" leaves little room to work within the space provided for the pipes, and t-bolt clamps included in ebay pipe kits SUCK. I broke 5 after driving on the salty roads.

Last edited by SamS; Jan 28, 2007 at 12:28 AM.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #15  
Mouglie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 338
Total Cats: 0
From: Iowa
Default

the way i would put it is, try drinking a beverage through a coffee straw...
but i have the same problem. my solution, 2.5"-2" for my air filter to turbo.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
miatamania's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

so does it really matter? 2 or 2.5"?
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 02:09 AM
  #17  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

I think if you'll do a search over at m.net, or through Corky's posts there, you'll find that he's researched this at length.

If I remember correctly, he did back to back runs on pipe size ranging from about 1.75-3.00 inches and found virtually no difference in spool/power/response/etc... In the power and psi ranges we typically deal with on this forum, anywhere from 2.0-3.0 will be identical.

The benefit of smaller pipes is (as said earlier) that they are much easier to route... and they're cheaper (both for pipe and couplers). However, almost all of the eBay intercoolers out there are 2.5" in/out and the intake manifold inlet for 1.6 and 1.8 motors is also 2.5".

Depending on your turbo, the compressor outlet can be anywhere from 1.75 to 2.5". Most of the smaller T25's I've seen have been 2", which means a 2"-2.5" enlarger coupler and then 2.5" all the way to the manifold. Somebody with a T3, what do your compressor outlets run?

I run 2" all the way to the manifold, and use a 90* 2"-2.5" enlarging coupler there.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #18  
Fritch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
From: Holiday, FL
Default

thanks a bunch guys, think I'll stick with 2" for simplicity and ease
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #19  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

some one should change this threads title to does size realy matter :lol:
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #20  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

i don't think she's gonna care if your pipe is 2" or 3" :gay:
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.