Dual Feed Fuel Rail
#1
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Dual Feed Fuel Rail
I was wondering how many of you guys are running a dual feed rail? At what level of boost does it become necessary?
FYI, I'm at 7.5 pounds with my 1.6 injectors. If the clutch holds, I'll turn boost up a little when I get bigger injectors.
Edit: Did you notice a difference in egt after installation of the dual feed?
Thanks
FYI, I'm at 7.5 pounds with my 1.6 injectors. If the clutch holds, I'll turn boost up a little when I get bigger injectors.
Edit: Did you notice a difference in egt after installation of the dual feed?
Thanks
__________________
91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing
Last edited by Ben; 08-23-2006 at 05:01 PM. Reason: revision
#3
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,898
Total Cats: 399
I agree. I doubt the factory fuel rail is doing much harm on a 1.6 at 7 psi. But having balanced flow is good insurance if you have the time to play around. Many people drill/tap the end of the factory fuel rail for 1/8NPT and put a barb fitting in there to make it dual feed. If you like bling and being broke you could buy a Vishnu rail. Jim B sells/sold an aluminum rail that should be better than stock too, but looked too crude for me, so I decided to made my own for shitsngiggles.
#4
Tim that looks really nice. It would look even nicer under my hood.
As for the original question, I agree that balanced flow to all injectors will never hurt. If you have the time and/or $$$, it'll give you an extra measure of safety.
I can't find it, but there was an old thread on another forum where Shiv (maker of the Vishnu rail) said something to the effect that stock injectors will never outflow the stock rail b/c their size so you're probably okay with the stock rail and 1.6 injectors. Bigger injectors and more power is another story as already said.
As for the original question, I agree that balanced flow to all injectors will never hurt. If you have the time and/or $$$, it'll give you an extra measure of safety.
I can't find it, but there was an old thread on another forum where Shiv (maker of the Vishnu rail) said something to the effect that stock injectors will never outflow the stock rail b/c their size so you're probably okay with the stock rail and 1.6 injectors. Bigger injectors and more power is another story as already said.
#8
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
I haven't checked the pressures, but from what I understand the Pierburg can supply over 140psi of fuel when clamped off. My JB Welded fitting held the pressure fine, I'm not too worried about it since I'll only be pushing 108psi or so.
Regular fuel injection hose (SAE30R9) is required to have higher working pressure rating (125psi) and minimum burst pressure rating (900psi). If you are worried about pressures in your fuel lines then, look for an SAE rating on the hose. SAE30R6 and SAE30R7 are low pressure hose for carburated enginges (rated for 50 psi and a minimum burst pressure of 250 psi) and SAE30R9 is a higher pressure fuel injection hose. If your hose has a number between R7 and R9 it is a medium pressure hose.
From what I've spoken to with Corky the same thing applies to the rail itself. He's much more conserned with the FPR failing before the lines and hoses fail.
Regular fuel injection hose (SAE30R9) is required to have higher working pressure rating (125psi) and minimum burst pressure rating (900psi). If you are worried about pressures in your fuel lines then, look for an SAE rating on the hose. SAE30R6 and SAE30R7 are low pressure hose for carburated enginges (rated for 50 psi and a minimum burst pressure of 250 psi) and SAE30R9 is a higher pressure fuel injection hose. If your hose has a number between R7 and R9 it is a medium pressure hose.
From what I've spoken to with Corky the same thing applies to the rail itself. He's much more conserned with the FPR failing before the lines and hoses fail.
Last edited by Braineack; 08-24-2006 at 11:33 AM.
#14
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Exactly. I'm quite confident in my abilities, but if it ain't broke then there's nothing to fix... I'd rather invest limited resources (and time IS a resource) into meaningful mods. If it's not necessary at 8 psi and 230cc injectors, then there's no use. OTOH, if it keeps the temp at #4 down, then it would be worthwhile.
#19
This post made me do a lot more reading up on dual feed fuel rails and learned two interesting things from some old threads about people who did some actual dyno testing.
#1 dual feed stock rail (~$10) was just about as good as vishnu/FM/****'s for most applications on the dyno. Granted, the more radical the setup, the higher end stuff started to make some gains over the stock mod.
#2 More than just for safety, most people on the dyno were able to advance their timing a few degrees b/c of the dual feed rail and hence make more power. Interesting....
#1 dual feed stock rail (~$10) was just about as good as vishnu/FM/****'s for most applications on the dyno. Granted, the more radical the setup, the higher end stuff started to make some gains over the stock mod.
#2 More than just for safety, most people on the dyno were able to advance their timing a few degrees b/c of the dual feed rail and hence make more power. Interesting....