Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Exhaust diameter 2.5" vs 3"... Noticeable difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 12:09 PM
  #1  
miataa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 105
Total Cats: 1
From: South Lake Tahoe
Default Exhaust diameter 2.5" vs 3"... Noticeable difference?

Finally going to order my turbo kit. I currently have a 2.5" cat back exhaust going into an ANSA silverline dual outlet exhaust. This exhaust came on the car when I purchased it a few years ago, but I really enjoy the sound. I'd like to keep it and save some cost on the turbo kit, however I realize that a 3" exhaust would be better. My question though, is how much better? Does anyone have any concrete stats comparing the 2 sizes?
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

On a 200hp setup its mostly transient response which no one will have data for, no.

Dann
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 01:11 PM
  #3  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Tests have been done. You want the 3". Tests are 10+ years old so you will have to do a ton of searching to find the data if you don't believe us.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 01:25 PM
  #4  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Sound will change, so don't keep an exhaust based upon sound. Adding a turbo is like adding a HUGE muffler all by itself.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 02:08 PM
  #5  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

You can keep the small exhaust for now if youre trying to save money. If its just a street car it will still be a load of fun even if it isnt optimized to the max.

Maybe in a couple years youll throw a full 3" at it with the MTnet approved muffler and see what you were missing.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 02:37 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by miataa
Finally going to order my turbo kit. I currently have a 2.5" cat back exhaust going into an ANSA silverline dual outlet exhaust. This exhaust came on the car when I purchased it a few years ago, but I really enjoy the sound.
how loud is it now?
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 03:20 PM
  #7  
jstck's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 89
Total Cats: 11
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Default

If Flyin' Miatas numbers are to be trusted, on a 266rwhp 1.8 they got 16hp and boost 200rpm earlier with a 3" exhaust vs a 2.5".
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
miataa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 105
Total Cats: 1
From: South Lake Tahoe
Default

Originally Posted by jstck
If Flyin' Miatas numbers are to be trusted, on a 266rwhp 1.8 they got 16hp and boost 200rpm earlier with a 3" exhaust vs a 2.5".
Thanks for the info! I feel that's pretty significant. Really appreciate it!

Originally Posted by shuiend
Tests have been done. You want the 3". Tests are 10+ years old so you will have to do a ton of searching to find the data if you don't believe us.
Haha, I always trust all of you miata guru's, that's why I asked here.

Originally Posted by Braineack
how loud is it now?
It's definitely louder than stock by a few decibels, but has a really nice deep tone at a low pitch. I would like to say it's not obnoxiously loud, but I've had some neighbors complain about the rumble from my morning warm-up enrichment cycles lol.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 04:10 PM
  #9  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Bottom line:
if already have, keep 2.5 until you get to it's limit.
if buying/building/upgrading, 3" no question
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 07:44 PM
  #10  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

FMs big bore exhausts are not straight through.

Those tests are not testing what you and I think of as a 'turbo exhaust'.

Dann
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 07:56 PM
  #11  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...63/#post961510
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 09:18 PM
  #12  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

Lots of good info proves 3”>2.5”. Where things got fuzzy for me was length and muffler volume. With the smaller 2.5” size I was able to get 2 smallish mufflers in-line and terminate just before the diff. With the 3”size I would not have enough muffler volume in the same location. I would have to use a large oval in the back and terminate near the bumper.

With my 300 WHP 9 psi Rotrex It was hard to imagine the larger size helping out. If anything it may have hurt midrange torque where I needed it the most. Someday I’ll pull the system and dyno it wide open just to see how much it’s holding back HP.

Just another perspective to consider for SC cars.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 09:40 PM
  #13  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

If anything it may have hurt midrange torque
what makes you say this?
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:09 PM
  #14  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

@18psi....SC car uses exhaust scavenging and velocity like an NA. On the merican LS3 builds I’ve seen the 2.5” midrange was stronger than the 3”. Given the weak sauce midrange of the Rotrex I figure it needs all the help it can get.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:12 PM
  #15  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Yeah I've heard that many times before. But have yet to see a dyno plot to confirm it, which is why I question it.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:18 PM
  #16  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

@18 psi, sorry I don’t have controlled A to B comparison. Don’t mean to pollute the MT forum with info I can’t back up. Judge the merits of my statements on my past accomplishments and take it for what it’s worth.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:24 PM
  #17  
borka's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Total Cats: 197
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by k24madness
Lots of good info proves 3”>2.5”. Where things got fuzzy for me was length and muffler volume. With the smaller 2.5” size I was able to get 2 smallish mufflers in-line and terminate just before the diff. With the 3”size I would not have enough muffler volume in the same location. I would have to use a large oval in the back and terminate near the bumper.

With my 300 WHP 9 psi Rotrex It was hard to imagine the larger size helping out. If anything it may have hurt midrange torque where I needed it the most. Someday I’ll pull the system and dyno it wide open just to see how much it’s holding back HP.

Just another perspective to consider for SC cars.
300hp at 9psi?? That's gotta be a record and one hell of a supercharger, no turbo can do 300hp at 9psi. Very curious how you accomplished this.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:55 PM
  #18  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

@Borka, 11:1 CR, custom cams, ported head & E85.

With the proper EFR turbo it would be pretty close at the same PSI and fuel. Nothing magical really.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 11:20 PM
  #19  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by k24madness
@18 psi, sorry I don’t have controlled A to B comparison. Don’t mean to pollute the MT forum with info I can’t back up. Judge the merits of my statements on my past accomplishments and take it for what it’s worth.
No worries. It's more just out of curiosity

Originally Posted by borka
300hp at 9psi?? That's gotta be a record and one hell of a supercharger, no turbo can do 300hp at 9psi. Very curious how you accomplished this.
incorrect.
there are several that can, but no real reason to do that
Old Apr 19, 2018 | 02:06 PM
  #20  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by borka
no turbo can do 300hp at 9psi.
Completely false.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.