the limit is ~225-250rwtq. the end. move along. use the search button next time.
|
I can do whatever i want. I am the 1%.
|
Originally Posted by godzillar32
(Post 794228)
If you wanna go fast, get a ride in a GT-R....mx-5's are just toys compared to the GT-R!!
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 794343)
I can do whatever i want. I am the 1%.
|
Well that turned out as expected. If betting on a fight between someone who is "Experianced" vs Super Human Admin Powers, always bet on the admin.
|
Originally Posted by dustinb
(Post 794398)
Well that turned out as expected. If betting on a fight between someone who is "Experianced" vs Super Human Admin Powers, always bet on the admin.
|
Originally Posted by BoostedBaby
(Post 794485)
WOW.....I agree totally with rawauto....im a noob to this site today and after reading the above thread im pretty discusted!!! What gives the Admin guy the rights to treat someone like this. Id love to know what the other site admins have to say....do they support this guys childist posts and deletion of the guy who got banned? Id like to know please guys as above is nothing short of bullying!!!
:fawk: The guy got a perfectly valid answer 225 - 250wh/tq Unfortunately he was fixated on wanting an upper boost limit, that answer is unavailable as has been stated it really depends. Unfortunately the poster couldn't get his head around that fact and threw his toys out. He was a guest on the site and behaved badly, I think Brain was well within his rights to ban him. |
Keep saying shit about me...
i answered the question. i pointed an error in fact (not theory). i wasn't being mean i wasn't being hostile. i was, however, annoyed to answer the same question for the 158th time; limit is 225-250rwtq, which I answered. i will continue to lol at people who use BHP. i will continue to lol at noobs who think 17psi = 17psi regardless of the volume flow. i will continue to be annoyed at new users that post in threads that have nothing to do with the subject matter on hand. |
Originally Posted by BoostedBaby
(Post 794501)
Richy..... Where's Warrington/Birmingham anyway outta interest dude?
Birmingham Missus lives in the latter, I live in the former. Anyway my opinion is invalid on this site as i have a supercharger, ha ha :P |
Keep this thread garrett vs chinacharger related content, else warnings/bans go out.
|
we should get some sort of "confirmed fits and doesnt suck" chinacharger list with applicable links. back in the day i did a bunch of searching to find this sort of info, but everything all consolidated in a thread/sticky would be nice for future reference.
|
My 2870 churbo is still good. I fairly happy with it. I was able to see most of the boost before 4k rpms.
Lol @ 1% |
Why is the China a 2870? Does it use a 2871 housing?
Is the "2870" because the gap between the compressor tip and the housing is > 1mm? :giggle: |
1 Attachment(s)
I believe the one BEGi sells the compressor wheel was closer to 70mm, so that's probably where that came from.
I know the ebay one labeled as a 2860 is a 71mm compressor: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1321286895 http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...r/IMG_7191.jpg I chose mine very carefully, I have a t3 trim chinacharger and it was very difficult to find one that had a 60mm compressor wheel, most were 76mm or bigger. |
Daymn that's a legitly sized inducer.
|
Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
(Post 795327)
Why is the China a 2870? Does it use a 2871 housing?
Is the "2870" because the gap between the compressor tip and the housing is > 1mm? :giggle:
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 795329)
I believe the one BEGi sells the compressor wheel was closer to 70mm, so that's probably where that came from.
I know the ebay one labeled as a 2860 is a 71mm compressor: I chose mine very carefully, I have a t3 trim chinacharger and it was very difficult to find one that had a 60mm compressor wheel, most were 76mm or bigger. |
well when Phil bought the turbo it was listed as a 2860...just saying
|
I never said it wasn't, it's labeled as 70 now. Same seller.
|
my 3076 was actually quite a bit larger than the "specs" posted for it indicated. like 4mm larger iirc.
on another note LOL, how did I miss the n00b pwnage.....I'm getting old *sniff* |
Originally Posted by buffon01
(Post 795351)
I never said it wasn't, it's labeled as 70 now. Same seller.
|
Not on the first date
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands