Originally Posted by Leafy
(Post 1140877)
you can fix that you know. dynapac gives you to power to hold the car for a second or two before starting the pull and it allows you to control the length of the pull. When I dyno'ed at a spec miata shop on a dynapac they only had it setup for SMs and I really didnt want to make a 25 second long 4th gear pull, with 7 a second hold at the start of the pull. So I think I dropped it to 3 seconds and a 15 second long pull because those were the numbers I pulled out of my ass on the spot.
That aside, Heikki's car was loaded the exact same way with both turbos. You create a folder for each car in the Dynapack software. When you put the same car back on the dyno, you just open the old folder and load the old settings, otherwise skipping the initial setup. |
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140878)
Well aware. You actually set the settle time, hold time, and rate of RPM rise in RPM/sec.
|
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140839)
6758 may be a better choice, but IMO the 6258 leaves something to be desired.
Nobody's accusing you of impropriety. We're just curious why your customer made 90 less horsepower with the same turbo on a similar motor at the same boost level as other people have. |
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140871)
What 6258 setup bends rods?
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140871)
Who else has done a comparison, same car, same dyno, same motor?
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140871)
I have complete faith in the dyno results because I was there.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1140885)
I thought your comparison was of a 2560R and an EFR6758?
Nobody's accusing you of impropriety. We're just curious why your customer made 90 less horsepower with the same turbo on a similar motor at the same boost level as other people have. |
Are you sure he had a GT2560? The spool up from the 2560 looks like a 2560 but after that it looks like a 2860 or a 3071. I'm not just hung up on the poor efr showing, its also the exceptional (record setting?) 2560 showing on a dyno that's infamous for reading stupid low.
|
I'm struggling a little with the 2560R numbers too. 335whp from a 2560R through a VICS intake and log exhaust manifolds is hard to stomach. I've seen 335whp from a 2560R before, but it was on a dyno that reads 8% high, and it came from an FM Stroker breathing through a BEGi S4 manifold.
|
^this. That's way, way out of the park on a 2560. And it's not like it's a new turbo that nobody has tested before.
We do trust you. Something just seems wonky and we want to find the reason why your results are sooooo far different than the hypothesis. |
Didn't Jeremy from FM do a comparison on a test rig and the efr didn't toast the 2560 (with a 6258 not a 6758). Granted he did use the same tune for them. He used lower boost but the efr didn't crush the 2560 or anything.
I want a magical turbo but I'm still kind of skeptical. But it doesn't matter for me since I have safety parts to update before i worry about it. I also think that one day TSE will release dynos with their finished products and those should be reputable and nice. ALso they have older data with 2871 and others to compare to. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1140899)
I'm struggling a little with the 2560R numbers too. 335whp from a 2560R through a VICS intake and log exhaust manifolds is hard to stomach. I've seen 335whp from a 2560R before, but it was on a dyno that reads 8% high, and it came from an FM Stroker breathing through a BEGi S4 manifold.
It's the number the dyno gave 3 or 4 times, consistently. His 2560r made more power than I've ever seen from a 2560r, by 30 hp (10%). He's also got the only completely built engine that I've ever tested with that turbo; everyone else with a built engine has a bigger turbo. Keep in mind he has a p&p head, SUBs, external gate, and a good exhaust. I could only get 278 out of my BEGi S4 with 2560r and otherwise stock motor. We see ~250 out of BEGi S3s and FMIIs. |
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1140693)
Access granted. Built BP-Z3, +1.5mm 8.8:1, MS3X EMS; GT2560r (solid) vs EFR 6758 (dotted). Boost was a few psi less than I remembered, but you should get the idea:
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1403019383 I hit 200kpa @ 3000 rpm. 700 rpm is a pretty significant difference. |
I did an overlay with my 400whp on pump gas 27psi dyno.
This was on VICS IM, stock throttle body, stock 99 head, 9:1 compression 84mm pistons. http://gaiazov.com/photo/mt.net/EFR6...-GT2560R.png?? |
Is it just me or are those close enough that it might just have been that heikki wasn't running a fae fae aggressive timing map up top with the 6758? That's one thing that isn't taken into account, I assume the EFR can run more timing up top because it's greater efficiency?
Either way, >300whp in a Lotus 7 is fucking nuts. |
He would have to be pulling timing like crazy to maintain 20psi to redline yet drop off that hard past 5
|
Maybe you have to with a 2560 because it starts blowing hot air up there, whereas the 6758 is still going strong? I realize I've got no practical experience, I'm just throwing shit out there.
|
Originally Posted by thenuge26
(Post 1141025)
Is it just me or are those close enough that it might just have been that heikki wasn't running a fae fae aggressive timing map up top with the 6758? That's one thing that isn't taken into account, I assume the EFR can run more timing up top because it's greater efficiency?
Either way, >300whp in a Lotus 7 is fucking nuts. On Soviet's 400hp dyno he is also running 27psi. Ben has said they only went up to about 20psi. That difference could easily be the extra power and torque holding flat. |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 1141030)
I am pretty sure the guys at DIY who tuned heikki's car know how to tune it properly. You have to also remember that Heikki is also running the locost7 in hill climbs and out on track, it takes a hell of a lot more abuse then Fae's car has ever seen.
Anyway A++ thread drift, I don't even remember what the thread was originally about. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1141026)
He would have to be pulling timing like crazy to maintain 20psi to redline yet drop off that hard past 5
Even then, VVT retard at high rpm should help the top end dramatically. |
See hhammerly's dyno from yesterday for more data.
What I can't wrap my head around is going from record breaking 2560 to really low 6758 numbers. |
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1141053)
See hhammerly's dyno from yesterday for more data.
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1141053)
What I can't wrap my head around is going from record breaking 2560 to really low 6758 numbers.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands