DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

gt 2554r - 471171-3... Anyone using?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2009, 01:29 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
drgoodwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Posts: 115
Total Cats: 0
Default gt 2554r - 471171-3... Anyone using?

Anyone have any experience with this smallest BB turbo from Garrett?
drgoodwrench is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 01:32 AM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

plenty of people use the gt2554
18psi is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 01:41 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
drgoodwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Posts: 115
Total Cats: 0
Default

General consensus? Pretty happy?
drgoodwrench is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:05 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
akaryrye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 2,535
Total Cats: 2
Default

jesus did you even try to search? There are a bunch of people who use them ... I myself had on on a 1.6 for awhile and I thought it was great
akaryrye is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:23 AM
  #5  
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
zoomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: where most people are Utarded
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
Default

wow, amazing what a search for "2554" turns up!! https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/sea...earchid=687305
zoomin is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:30 AM
  #6  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

You ******* kidding?
Savington is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:33 AM
  #7  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

18psi is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:34 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Default

2554 is too small, no one makes any real power with one... tiny *** turbo for a tiny *** car.

Seriously though, if it werent for the fact that Im sure I will want more power later, I would go with the 2554, but the 2560 is a better match for me.
NA6C-Guy is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:53 AM
  #9  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

just go with one of these to be safe:
18psi is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:54 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ApexOnYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Eastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
Default

That turbo is over 1/2 the size of that engine.......
ApexOnYou is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:57 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Default

Jeses, I need a magnifying glass to see that thing.
NA6C-Guy is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 03:58 AM
  #12  
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
zoomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: where most people are Utarded
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
Default

damn, is that a gt30 or gt35 series turbo?
zoomin is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:09 AM
  #13  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

gt42r
18psi is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:30 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Default

Why exactly would one need a GT42 on I assume a BP. Though that head and block doesnt look completely familiar to me. Even on a 2.0 engine, you would never be able to use a turbo of that size to any kind of efficiency (or would you?) Even at 500whp, I wouldnt think that engine could ever flow enough to challenge that turbo in any way. Either way, that manifold is sex, and thats a big *** turbo. What do those cost, like $2000-$2500+?
NA6C-Guy is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:41 AM
  #15  
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
zoomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: where most people are Utarded
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
Why exactly would one need a GT42 on I assume a BP. Though that head and block doesnt look completely familiar to me. Even on a 2.0 engine, you would never be able to use a turbo of that size to any kind of efficiency (or would you?) Even at 500whp, I wouldnt think that engine could ever flow enough to challenge that turbo in any way. Either way, that manifold is sex, and thats a big *** turbo. What do those cost, like $2000-$2500+?
That's what I was thinking too!! Maybe the car spools it at 6000 has a 9500rpm redline?
zoomin is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 09:13 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
DammitBeavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EXTREME Southern Illinois
Posts: 281
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
Why exactly would one need a GT42 on I assume a BP. Though that head and block doesnt look completely familiar to me...
That's a Mitsubishi 4G63 (2.0l or more if stroked) or possibly a 4G64 (2.4l).
DammitBeavis is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 09:24 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Cpt_Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sandy, Utah
Posts: 174
Total Cats: 0
Default

Could be usable for drags. My buddy had a SR20DET running a T60. It did great out at the drag strip. Not my cup of tea though.
Cpt_Slow is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 01:55 PM
  #18  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
Why exactly would one need a GT42 on I assume a BP. Though that head and block doesnt look completely familiar to me. Even on a 2.0 engine, you would never be able to use a turbo of that size to any kind of efficiency (or would you?) Even at 500whp, I wouldnt think that engine could ever flow enough to challenge that turbo in any way. Either way, that manifold is sex, and thats a big *** turbo. What do those cost, like $2000-$2500+?
Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
That's a Mitsubishi 4G63 (2.0l or more if stroked) or possibly a 4G64 (2.4l).
ding ding ding....absolutely correct. the reason to use a gt42r (and quite a few dsm guys here in sac use them) is because:
1) fully built 4g63 motor that takes a **** ton of boost and spins all the way to 10k rpm.
2) full drag race aplication
3) they use antilag+nitrous to spool this sucker
4) runs single digits at the drag strip easily.

A buddy of mine has this setup on a talon, his best recorded et so far is 8.6
18psi is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:54 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
drgoodwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Posts: 115
Total Cats: 0
Default

Back to the original question...are you all happy with your gt2554r, or did they have problems/quirks etc... I know MANY have HAD them, but what do you think of them now ...
drgoodwrench is offline  
Old 02-04-2009, 01:05 AM
  #20  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Ok, what are you asking this question for? If you plan on running one and just want to know whether you should or not, just state your planned setup and what goals you have for the car and people will be able to help you out..

to ask the question you did is like asking people: anyone driving a miata? if so what do you think of them?
18psi is offline  


Quick Reply: gt 2554r - 471171-3... Anyone using?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.